Skip to comments.
Police Use New Tool Against Seat Belt Violators
http://www.officer.com/article/article.jsp?siteSection=1&id=23994 ^
Posted on 06/02/2005 1:59:57 PM PDT by Stew Padasso
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
To: Stew Padasso
2
posted on
06/02/2005 2:00:59 PM PDT
by
Stew Padasso
("That boy is nuttier than a squirrel turd.")
To: Stew Padasso
The same state has it ILLEGAL to ask immigration status when you do get pulled over (or get caught doing any crime)
3
posted on
06/02/2005 2:02:57 PM PDT
by
FreedomNeocon
(I'm in no Al-Samood for this Sheiite.)
To: Stew Padasso
few things tick me off more on a daily basis than having to put on my damn seat belt or risk getting a ticket.
I would vote for ANYONE who would promise to repeal this asinine law.
4
posted on
06/02/2005 2:03:41 PM PDT
by
Nyboe
( if rich democrats really want the rich to be taxed more ... then by all means TAX RICH DEMOCRATS)
To: Stew Padasso
Big Brother is watching you with a cool new set of night vision goggles.
To: Stew Padasso
Un-Fking believable! - This Country is turning into a police State more and more each day! - (we won't even patrol our da*m borders but we will hand out night-vision goggles to a bunch of SOF wannabe police officers so they can "play") -
Of course it is done under the guise of our "safety" -
Police Departments in this Country are out of control - They purchase new vehicles every other year, new toys about every month and are continually looking at ways to increase revenues from the general public.
To: Stew Padasso
"Maryland State Police Cpl. Kevin Sherwood said the night-vision goggles are an effective way to catch those drivers."
Heaven forbid these morons should use NVGs to stake out high-crime (robbery/rape/murder) areas and forgoe the revenue-enhancing traffic stops...
7
posted on
06/02/2005 2:05:30 PM PDT
by
PLMerite
("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
To: Stew Padasso
Chances are they don't give a rat's rootietoot about safety and are after the money from the ticket. After all they gotta pay for the goggles.
8
posted on
06/02/2005 2:05:55 PM PDT
by
OldEagle
(We might be in the end times, but it looks like we are finally moving in the RIGHT direction.)
To: Nyboe
It would be asinine to repeal asinine laws.
The sane people would all faint.
9
posted on
06/02/2005 2:06:14 PM PDT
by
Old Mountain man
(Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
To: Nyboe
"I would vote for ANYONE who would promise to repeal this asinine law."
There is probably federal monies tied into this whole program. Anyone???
10
posted on
06/02/2005 2:08:49 PM PDT
by
Stew Padasso
("That boy is nuttier than a squirrel turd.")
To: Stew Padasso
"Wednesday night at a seat-belt enforcement checkpoint, police from several Maryland agencies started using night-vision goggles to see if motorists were buckled up. "
This is why people hate the police and the safety Nazi's. Jerks!
11
posted on
06/02/2005 2:11:47 PM PDT
by
monday
To: All
There is no logic behind seatbelt laws. If we are to have laws with no purpose other than to protect the individual from himself then we should ticket smokers, the overweight and the sedintary.
Far more money goes into the health care system for those who are unfit than goes into emergency care for those who don't wear seatbelts. I stopped buying tickets to police fundraisers when seatbelt laws were enacted.
12
posted on
06/02/2005 2:12:14 PM PDT
by
Deb8
To: Free and Armed
It's all fun and games until some annoyed citizen gets a class III laser and modifies a seat belt Nazi's weltanschauung.
To: Stew Padasso
Yeah. It's part of the Transportation bill, isn't it? States receive more funding if they have laws authorizing police to enforce seat belt laws, even if that's the only 'law' broken.
14
posted on
06/02/2005 2:15:05 PM PDT
by
kenth
To: Stew Padasso; admin
15
posted on
06/02/2005 2:16:02 PM PDT
by
Mortikhi
To: Stew Padasso
It's a law to reduce the number of potential Darwin Award winners (I say let natural selection occur - we do have too many laws, most of which aren't enforced - immigration).
All we need is appropriately priced insurance (since there are laws requiring me to buy insurance) for those who don't want to wear the belt and everyone should be free to choose.
16
posted on
06/02/2005 2:17:45 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Don't Tread on Me; Live Free or Die)
To: Stew Padasso
It's about revenue....
Nothing more, nothing less.
17
posted on
06/02/2005 2:18:04 PM PDT
by
Osage Orange
(Hillary Clinton is about as welcome as an egg-sucking dog...in my neck of the woods.)
To: Stew Padasso
Ridiculous! Here we are with a bunch of Special Forces wannabees peering into private citizens cars while our borders are being overrun.
18
posted on
06/02/2005 2:19:19 PM PDT
by
Nov3
("This is the best election night in history." --DNC chair Terry McAuliffe Nov. 2,2004 8p.m.)
To: OldEagle
Ever see a cop out doing anything like that while it's raining? I know I haven't. You suppose all the danger of people speeding or driving without seat belts just sort of goes away when it rains?
19
posted on
06/02/2005 2:20:19 PM PDT
by
tahotdog
To: Stew Padasso
The word "Liberty" must be expunged from the federal and all state constitutions.
20
posted on
06/02/2005 2:23:30 PM PDT
by
gorush
(Exterminate the Moops!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson