Skip to comments.
Police: Elderly N.J. Couple Had Hundreds Of Guns
WNBC Television ^
| 6/2/2005
Posted on 06/02/2005 5:16:17 AM PDT by Puppage
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-248 next last
She suffers from Alzheimer's disease.So? Maybe she's incontinent, too.
1
posted on
06/02/2005 5:16:17 AM PDT
by
Puppage
To: Puppage
What the heck are they guilty of?
To: Puppage
I don't blame them...they probably looked around and saw how the government was running the country.......
3
posted on
06/02/2005 5:19:09 AM PDT
by
Route101
To: SouthernFreebird
What's a "hazardous situation" and how can you be charged?
4
posted on
06/02/2005 5:19:57 AM PDT
by
caver
(In the words of that illustrious socialite twit Paris Hilton, "That's hot".)
To: Puppage
He should have not lived in NJ if he wanted that kind of collection. Of course that does not let NJ off the hook for being a state that thumbs its nose at the constitution.
5
posted on
06/02/2005 5:20:10 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(an armed society is a polite society (Heinlien).)
To: SouthernFreebird
Were the guns locked up? Who "ratted them out"??
So far, they're guilty of nothing.
6
posted on
06/02/2005 5:21:17 AM PDT
by
xcamel
(Deep Red, stuck in a "bleu" state.)
To: Puppage
I don't know that a crime was committed but I'm not sure I would want an Alzheimer's victim having easy access to weapons.
My grandmother had a neighbor who suffered from Alzheimer's disease. He tried to kill his wife when he didn't recognize her.
7
posted on
06/02/2005 5:22:18 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Anyone who thinks we believe Hillary on any issue is truly a moron.)
To: Puppage
I'm curious as to why the cops were searching their house in the first place. Does any one know?
8
posted on
06/02/2005 5:23:25 AM PDT
by
basil
(Exercise your Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
To: cripplecreek
I'm not sure I would want an Alzheimer's victim having easy access to weaponsWhere in this article does it mention easy access??
9
posted on
06/02/2005 5:23:25 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
To: Puppage
My aunt had Alzheimer's disease and when she reached a certain point in her psychosis I wouldn't have wanted her to have access to any guns.
It would have been worse than leaving them for a child to get at.
10
posted on
06/02/2005 5:23:35 AM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: Puppage
"The weapons range from pistols to machine guns."Really now? I doubt it. Typical ignorant media.
"He's now charged with creating a hazardous situation."
What hazardous situation? Did he booby-trap his collection? Were the guns stored loaded, cocked and UNlocked? Don't the police know how to handle weapons and ammunition?
11
posted on
06/02/2005 5:23:40 AM PDT
by
SW6906
To: Puppage; All
FReepers, if you have this sort of a collection, it is your civic duty to start passing it on to Constitutionally-minded youngsters when you get up in years, so this fate does not come to it.
12
posted on
06/02/2005 5:24:17 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Official Ruling Class Oligarch Oppressor)
To: Puppage
He's now charged with creating a hazardous situation and could face other charges. I guess the police armory is a "hazardous situation," too. At what point does gun ownership transition from collecting to a "hazardous situation"? Can I own 99 guns and be a collector, but buy one more and be charged with a crime? How did the police ever get a warrant to search if there was no evidence of a crime?
13
posted on
06/02/2005 5:24:56 AM PDT
by
mbynack
To: Joe Brower
14
posted on
06/02/2005 5:24:58 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Official Ruling Class Oligarch Oppressor)
To: Puppage
They were in the home. that's easy access in my book.
15
posted on
06/02/2005 5:25:01 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Anyone who thinks we believe Hillary on any issue is truly a moron.)
To: Puppage
All I see in this article are more guns seized by the government from private citizens.
16
posted on
06/02/2005 5:25:19 AM PDT
by
chapin2500
(Howard Deans eyes are to close together.)
To: SouthernFreebird
He was a physician and gun enthusiast who was arrested in 1974 and charged with selling submachine guns, grenades and other weapons to two undercover federal agents.Notice it does not say "convicted". If he had been, then imho, they would have said so. At that point, absent any felony convictions or misdemeanor acts of domestic violence, I can't think of a Federal crime here. Unless the Class 3 stuff does not have the paperwork.
It sounds to me as if someone is looting the gentle folks' gun collection.
17
posted on
06/02/2005 5:26:06 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(Grant no power to government you would not want your worst enemies to wield against you.)
To: SouthernFreebird
What the heck are they guilty of?Being targeted & set up by JBT's. I am very surprised the feds ddin't track down their kids & shoot them ala Randy Weaver's wife.
18
posted on
06/02/2005 5:30:24 AM PDT
by
ctlpdad
(Liberals - weeds in the lawn of society.)
To: FreedomPoster
19
posted on
06/02/2005 5:31:19 AM PDT
by
PGalt
To: Puppage
Yep the police have found a very valuble life time collection and will find a way to keep it and profit themselves, just because they can.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-248 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson