Posted on 06/01/2005 5:22:42 PM PDT by perfect stranger
Great photos but I don't agree with your take on Ann.
NEW photos!
ANN COULTER joins the U.S. Marines [and L.A. FReepers] at party after "Late, Late Show"
Posted by RonDog
On News/Activism 05/24/2005 9:11:20 PM PDT · 176 replies · 10,749+ views
Ann Coulter pics from Craig Ferguson's Late, Late Show ^ | May 24, 2005 | RonDog [and FRiends]
bump
I strongly disagree- it is EXACTLY that that I love about her articles. As Rush said "illustrating absurdity by being absurd"
bttt
BTTT
Not my photos, but I'm glad you like them and your disagreement with me is politely stated.
Thank you.
There is a time and place for everything. But to me, it's beginning to look like Ann has only one style, only one way of communicating. For the followers of Ann, that's fine.
For some of you she's putting a sarcastic voice on things you would like to say, but can't because you don't have the access.
But for the fence sitters and those conservatives like me who like things to the point, serious, but respectful, Ann turns us off.
I'm a life long republican and nothing is going to change that for me, but Ann is running off some fence sitters.
I can give you examples of that from my own family. My own parents, who are as conservative as you get, can't stand her either. (Actually my dad died right after he voted this year-his story is on my homepage). The younger ones. My young adult nephews can't stand to listen to her and she is one of the ones that they point to as a mean conservative.
The boys all voted dem even though they all came from republican families. True you COULD say that most young people are democrats until they get older, but I had 4 sibling, all republican, who all married republicans, who had other children who became republican. My uncles, aunts, grandparents and cousins are all republican.
People like Ann turn off many of the younger voters surprisingly
We have to get these young voters and keep them.
She hurts us there. She doesn't help.
She's singing to the choir and then rumbling in the alley, with nothing accomplished at all.
I think she is great fun! But, she's not for everyone. Some people are just too serious and dour to enjoy her. If you don't like her, don't read, or listen to her. Of course, if you do that, you'll miss out on your dose of anti-liberalism. That could be bad.
I get the liberal thing quite a bit when I talk about Ann! Some young lady called me a commie when I said I wasn't one of the Ann lovers.....
(You just admitted you're not "one of us."
But "we" figured that out many posts ago!
The Liberal Left and Comrades
Exposed AGAIN and AGAIN here on Free Republic! )
That one actually made me laugh though.
You are absolutely right that I get upset when Franken or Rhodes or Moore or any of those idiots bash her. But I have to admit that at times, they are right when they are talking about her attitude. I know that's not popular either, but she is a bit over the top sometimes. I don't want ANY of us to do down to their level especially, someone as intelligent as Ann.
(Of course those people are indeed the scum of the earth and are the worst sort of slime EVER, so in that way, I hate for them to even say her name.)
She could tear them apart just as easily by using mature and somewhat less haughty dialogue.
She makes for great TV, no doubt about it, but she's so smart and she is almost ALWAYS RIGHT.
I just wish she could get those right ideas out to the fence sitters and passive voters.
Gosh, think about all the people she could motivate to get involved in politics if she made it cool.
She at the right place for that and I believe that if she worked on putting her charm and intelligence out there instead of just a biting wit, she could do much for our side.
But right now, she appeals to the already convinced.
I want to see that beautiful and intelligent woman make the most of what she's got, but she doesn't. She doesn't need the skirts up to her panty line. I'm no prude, but some thing classical and tailored with designer shoes would make you guys swoon even more.)
She'd be more visually appealing and if she used her charm and warmth that I hear she has, instead of the....whatever that is...I think she'd be our best weapon.
So, it's not that I hate Ann. I just wish she would show us what she's really got.
Here are a couple of examples of things that would look more sexy and more conservative than she wears now. What would be wrong with stuff like this?
With shoes like this....
Now, wouldn't that be nice? She would look totally hot dressed like that instead. :-)
Thanks again for talking with me about this.
Yes, she can be great fun. That's why I think she could expand herself more and reach more people. :-)
I have trained my system to self produce anti-liberalism doses ;-)
Hey do you think she'd look good in some of the outfits I posted the post up or so?
Just interested in a guy's opinion.
I hoped you would like that. Those are great shoes! :-)
Bump so I can read this later.
"First of all I think this type of sarcasm is a bit childish. It might be okay every now and then, but she will use this technique several times in each article....
It's not as if the Democrats have behaved outrageously for the past four years using their minority status to block Bush's nominees. Oh wait – no, I have that wrong.
This stuff runs me nuts. She repeats that same 'technique' in the very next paragraph. Then she skips a paragraph and then does it again. It's done several more times."
- texasflower
Nice screen name. I'm afraid I don't understand your point.
Am I supposed to be impressed or upset or what? I'm not trying to sound snippy. I just don't understand what you mean.
Ann is awesome! She has more ca!@#%$ as a female than the combined fabulous men of the peacemaking 7.
Ann - you *go* girlfriend! :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
