Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reagan Pardon's "Deep Throat," Clinton Pardons Terrorists he was after
University of Texas Archives ^ | April 15, 1981 | Ronald Reagan

Posted on 05/31/2005 7:36:57 PM PDT by BringBackMyHUAC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: appeal2
DUDE! Put the crackpipe down... And step away from the computer!


61 posted on 06/01/2005 11:10:17 AM PDT by chudogg (www.chudogg.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kabar

==I don't hold the same view you do of Nixon. I am surprised about your description of Nixon as "an unprincipled sellout" given your moniker and Nixon's involvement with HUAC and the Hiss case.

Excerpt taken from "Soviet Moles in the CIA (Part I)"
ISWR 1994

Too many moles to count

Pentration of the CIA is certainly not a new Soviet goal. The Communists found their best opportunity at the time the CIA was first created--during World War II, when the new agency was known as the Office of Strategic Services (OSS).

Nathaniel Weyl, who broke with the Communist Party, USA, wrote that "In the Office of Strategic Services... employment of pro-Communists was approved at very high levels provided that they were suited for specific jobs."10 As it turned out, OSS director General William "Wild Bill" Donovan had systematically recruited his OSS personnel directly from Communist Party membership.

Nor was Donovan shy about admitting this. When confronted by the FBI with clear evidence of Communist agents in the OSS, Donovan boasted, "I know they're Communists; that's why I hired them."11

When the OSS became the CIA in 1947, the original personnel were largely retained, Communists and all. By 1952, CIA director Walter Bedell Smith publicly confirmed that hidden Communist agents were working inside his agency.12

Since no one in the Executive branch seemed to be interested in rooting out these spies, Congress began to take an interest. Joseph McCarthy's subcommittee specifically raised the idea of a formal investigation, as later described by legal advisor Roy Cohn:

“One desired investigation that never got started was that of the Central Intelligence Agency, headed by Allen W. Dulles. Our staff had been accumulating extensive data about its operations and McCarthy was convinced that an inquiry was overdue.

Our files contained allegations gathered from various sources indicating that the CIA had unwittingly hired a large number of double agents-individuals who, although working for the CIA, were actually Communist agents whose mission was to plant inaccurate data....

...although we spent far more for intelligence than other countries, the quality of the information we were receiving was so poor that at times the CIA found out what was happening only when it read the newspapers....

When the news broke out that McCarthy was contemplating an inquiry into the CIA, consternation reigned at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue [the White House]. Vice-President Nixon was assigned to the delicate job of blocking it.”13

Block it Nixon did, and no outside investigation of spies in the CIA has ever been held. The consequences were obvious. Even the Eisenhower administration was forced to admit in 1954 that CIA intelligence measures against the Soviet Bloc had been a dismal failure.14 Since the end of World War II and continuing to this day, the United States has never been able to infiltrate the KGB or recruit double agents of any significance.

Relevant Notes:

12 Burnham, J., The Web of Subversion, Western Islands, Belmont, MA, 1965, p. 182.

13 Cohn, R., McCarthy: The Answer to "Tail Gunner Joe", Manor Books, New York, 1977, pp. 63-64.

14 Martin, D.C., Wilderness of Mirrors, Harper & Row, New York, 1980, p. 62.


62 posted on 06/01/2005 4:10:01 PM PDT by BringBackMyHUAC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: A Jovial Cad

Given everything Felt has been through, and given the fact that he was a stand up guy when the Left was attempting to dismantle the FBI via the courts, I'm willing to give Felt the benefit of the doubt. Like I said, I think there are huge pieces of the Watergate story that have yet to be told. In addition to the links below, you might also want to check out post #62--HUAC

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1414100/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1414117/posts


63 posted on 06/01/2005 4:28:55 PM PDT by BringBackMyHUAC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

See post #62 and #63


64 posted on 06/01/2005 4:29:30 PM PDT by BringBackMyHUAC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: BringBackMyHUAC
Vice-President Nixon was assigned to the delicate job of blocking it.”13 Block it Nixon did, and no outside investigation of spies in the CIA has ever been held.

VP Nixon worked for President Eisenhower. The buck stops there. That said, I don't know what the definition of "outside" is, but there are intelligence committees that have oversight responsibilities for the CIA. They conduct all kinds of investigations and inquiries. Should they be privy to all information beyond a need to know? No.

65 posted on 06/01/2005 5:03:16 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: kabar

My view: Nixon made his name with HUAC when it was popular, then blocked similar investigations when the Left made it controversial (and then unpopular). I am no fan of Nixon. Having said that, I appreciate your imput. Feel free to add to your comments because you are one of only a few that actually adds to my knowledgebase (on this topic)--HUAC


66 posted on 06/01/2005 5:29:17 PM PDT by BringBackMyHUAC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: kabar

I'd be glad to send you some articles that shed light on the why and how of the "need" for outside investigation. Let me know--HUAC


67 posted on 06/01/2005 5:37:22 PM PDT by BringBackMyHUAC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Amen!


68 posted on 06/01/2005 10:28:54 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

Meet the real enemy:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/politics.asp
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/media.asp
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/funder.asp


69 posted on 06/01/2005 11:05:54 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla

Thanks for the links. I agree with most of what is said on the site until;
http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/guideDesc.asp?catid=128&type=issue
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/jonahgoldberg/printjg20030827.shtml

>>The relevant argument is what you want to do about it. I can tell you what kind of globalization someone prefers simply by asking what they think about America and the United Nations. If they think the former is a problem and the latter is a solution, they lean to the left on globalization. If they think it's the other way around, they lean to the right. Indeed, in common usage, anti-globalization is often just another term for anti-Americanism.<<


I am anti UN and anti-globalization, so I guess I would confuse Jonah Goldberg all the way around.

Globalization is socialism not capitalism.

Meet the real enemy: The list is very incomplete!

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewGroups.asp?catId=6
Groups;
Where is Council on American-Islamic Relations?

IMMIGRATION
Where is the Democratic Party, the Republican Party, and PRESIDENT BUSH?


70 posted on 06/02/2005 3:43:44 AM PDT by B4Ranch ( Report every illegal alien that you meet. Call 866-347-2423, it's a FREE CALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: BringBackMyHUAC; All

..........for the record......what religious denomination was Felt?


71 posted on 06/02/2005 4:39:06 PM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maestro

No idea what religious denomination Felt comes from. Am I missing something here????


72 posted on 06/02/2005 5:17:09 PM PDT by BringBackMyHUAC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson