Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheney's attacks on N Korean leader get personal (“The name-calling is unhelpful” - China)
Sydney Morning Herald ^ | May 31, 2005 | Hamish McDonald Herald Correspondent in Beijing and agencies

Posted on 05/31/2005 7:20:30 AM PDT by dead

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
He has nuclear weapons and he has the uniform to deliver them.


1 posted on 05/31/2005 7:20:31 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dead

Cheney needs to be more diplomatic when dealing with Kim Il Puggsley.


2 posted on 05/31/2005 7:21:56 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

I like it when Cheney talks tough. He should be a role model for the stoneless members of the GOP.


3 posted on 05/31/2005 7:24:53 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

"You're bweaking my bawls, Cheney. You're bweaking my bawls."


4 posted on 05/31/2005 7:27:26 AM PDT by dfwgator (Flush Newsweek!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

Obligatory graphic

5 posted on 05/31/2005 7:27:48 AM PDT by martin_fierro (Proud RUB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

He's the perfect fit to talk tough. He has no horses in any future races.


6 posted on 05/31/2005 7:28:38 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

Cheney just told the truth on meet the press


7 posted on 05/31/2005 7:30:38 AM PDT by TheLostBoy (Be Professional, Be Polite, Be Prepared to Kill Everyone You Meet. OIF 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dead

Well, why would Cheney call Kim Jong Il one of the world's most irresponsible leaders? Maybe because he is?


8 posted on 05/31/2005 7:32:25 AM PDT by JustaCowgirl (The incidence of coincidence rises with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Oh for God's sake, now we have to be nice to this guy? Let's all take up lying in order to get little Kimmie to give up his nukes. What a waste of time. He already broke his last agreement with us. The only thing that would break this impasse is Kim's sudden conversion to sanity, which isn't going to happen.


9 posted on 05/31/2005 7:33:20 AM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead

God forbid we offend the little psycho tryant gulag running maniac with nuclear ambitions to extort the world.
Lord knows Clintons approach of kissing his butt worked.


10 posted on 05/31/2005 7:33:30 AM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dmz

Let China try to feed the starving North Korenas if they are so impressed with Kim's leadership, use of resources and commitment to humanity. Maybe after putting money down the NK rat hole for a few decades, they would hum a different tune about their money being wasted as well.


11 posted on 05/31/2005 7:33:30 AM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rod1

Nothing happens in NK without the approval of the Red Chinese.


12 posted on 05/31/2005 7:39:06 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (ignore that man behind the curtain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dead
So now the veep has to respect commie trash before they get nuked to oblivion?
13 posted on 05/31/2005 7:42:00 AM PDT by aspiring.hillbilly (!.....ripped from the headlines.....!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

now that's funny!


14 posted on 05/31/2005 7:46:25 AM PDT by Jen from Tn.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

Time for a chorus of "I'm So Ronery".


15 posted on 05/31/2005 7:53:10 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JustaCowgirl

NK at night.
16 posted on 05/31/2005 7:57:51 AM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dead; TigerLikesRooster

LOL! (Sidebar here: "Hey, TLR did you see this pic?")


17 posted on 05/31/2005 8:16:24 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (**AT THE END OF THE DAY, IT IS NOT SO MUCH "WHO" WE STAND FOR, BUT RATHER "WHAT" WE STAND FOR**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

I'm still trying to figure out what 'name-calling' occurred to get China upset.

All I saw in the article where declarations of fact, not opinion.


18 posted on 05/31/2005 8:51:32 AM PDT by gogogodzilla (Raaargh! Raaargh! Crush, Stomp!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasota
I like it too, but he has not even started to talk tough: he is merely stating facts.

Of course, in the mental world that the left lives in, this is calling people "names."

19 posted on 05/31/2005 9:14:45 AM PDT by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist

Well spoken about the "mental world that the left lives in". I've never understood their logic and can't bear the thought of reading Ann Coulter's book to get it. I prefer to ignore them.


20 posted on 05/31/2005 9:22:32 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson