Skip to comments.
Book: Lindbergh had 7 German children
cnn ^
| 5-30-05
| Reuters
Posted on 05/30/2005 10:16:31 AM PDT by LouAvul
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: FreedomSurge
And, or but - as the case may be, did Lindberg report accurately and honestly what he found?
And, to who was he reporting accurately and honestly?
Joseph Kennedy, an avowed pro-Irish crook, did much to split US/UK relations BEFORE the war as US ambassador to England - For who was he really fighting?
The very=pro Russia/Soviet/Communist member in the State Dept and Roosevelt Cabinet - For whom were they fighting - before the War, before the Russian-German alliance, after the Russia-German Alliance, and then, after the German invasion of Russia?
Pro-Communist "union/worker" saboteurs in France did NOT start fighting the Germans until AFTER the German invasion in 41!
41
posted on
05/30/2005 1:12:46 PM PDT
by
Robert A Cook PE
(-I can only contribute to FR monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS contributes to her campaign every day)
To: PAR35
Good grief! I must have fallen asleep before the ending, and didn't realize it. All I remember seeing is where they made it seem that Lindburg had "done it". Guess I need to either stay awake, or shut up about what I've think I've seen.
Aplogies to all.
42
posted on
05/30/2005 1:29:54 PM PDT
by
basil
(Exercise your Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
To: basil
Yes, at about the mid point that looked like where they were heading, then they got the handwriting experts and the guy who studied the wood used in the ladder and from the attic, and it turned out the experts at the trial were telling the truth.
43
posted on
05/30/2005 5:47:58 PM PDT
by
PAR35
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
"That would, er, tend to explain his "unusual" pro-German (er, isolation and "pacifism") prior to WWII."
Tell us the truth. You chickened out when you were gong to talk about his unusual pro-German "positions," didn't you?
44
posted on
05/30/2005 5:49:42 PM PDT
by
righttackle44
(The most dangerous weapon in the world is a Marine with his rifle and the American people behind him)
To: righttackle44
?
As mentioned very clearly above, his extreme opposition to the US getting into the war was referenced, quoted, and discussed.
Do you think I needed to add more?
What we don't know is the degree of his opposition: If, as implied also, he was the only US pilot allowed access to German airfields, how accurate were his reports to the US of conditions in Germany, and how accurate (and what frequency), were his reports to the Germans of US attitudes and positions?
45
posted on
05/30/2005 7:18:28 PM PDT
by
Robert A Cook PE
(-I can only contribute to FR monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS contributes to her campaign every day)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
"Do you think I needed to add more?"
No. You did a good job of explaining. Made for interesting
additional perspective.
I should have added LOL. I was making a pun
on his additional children and
sexual positions.
(I often get booed when I make puns because some people say they're just not punny.)
(Don't blame me. I got the habit for a childhood friend of mine. He gets booed a lot, too.)
46
posted on
05/30/2005 7:25:33 PM PDT
by
righttackle44
(The most dangerous weapon in the world is a Marine with his rifle and the American people behind him)
To: righttackle44
"Oil weigh!", as the Jewish sailor from the Village was herd to spout when Moby Dick came into view.
Bit that one. Hook, line, and sucker............. 8<)
47
posted on
05/30/2005 7:42:08 PM PDT
by
Robert A Cook PE
(-I can only contribute to FR monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS contributes to her campaign every day)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
""Oil weigh!", as the Jewish sailor from the Village was herd to spout when Moby Dick came into view."
Like this one. Gonna add it to my repertoire,
with you permission.
48
posted on
05/30/2005 9:16:50 PM PDT
by
righttackle44
(The most dangerous weapon in the world is a Marine with his rifle and the American people behind him)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Having read Lindberg's wartime diaries detailing his combat experiences in the Pacific theater I would take him any day as a great American over all of the pissy little critics on this thread.
On Memorial Day, I find it offensive that innuendo is served up as fact against a man who offered brave service against the Japanese. He didn't have to put himself in harm's way. He traveled to the Pacific theater to study the Navy Corsair under combat conditions; He ended up flying 50 combat missions.
Prior to WWII, Lindberg was in a unique position to study developments in military aircraft. He did so with full support of the American embassies (who could have prevented his travels) as he had much greater freedom of movement than military members of the embassy staff.
To: joylyn
But [Lindbergh] was a great pilot and by no means as bad as some contributers on this topic suggest. The man had one wife and three mistresses concurrently, and probably had other affairs as well. What does it take for you to consider him bad? My only question is, did Anne know?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson