Hudson (New Hampshire) chief in the middle of immigration fight

Lowell Sun ^ | May 24, 2005 | DENNIS SHAUGHNESSEY

[junta]

We ought to find out who funds these open borders foot soldiers and then crack them between the eyes.

[Serenissima Venezia]

“Our position is that if you entered the country illegally, you committed a crime,” he said. “The United States government has spent billions of dollars on Homeland Security since September 11, 2001, and it starts with illegal aliens. They should not be here.”

What a man! (ie., not a wimp like most of our politicians)

[blackie]

Protect our borders and coastlines from all foreign invaders!

Be Ever Vigilant!

Minutemen Patriots ~ Bump!

[brytlea]

“These chiefs of police have become vigilantes. The fact that they wear badges does not make them less than vigilantes.

Duh. By definition people who are officially charged with upholding the laws are not vigilantes.
susie

[archy]

We ought to find out who funds these open borders foot soldiers and then crack them between the eyes.

For your attention:

"We have Nicaragua, soon we will have El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Costa Rica, and Mexico. One day, tomorrow or five years or fifteen years from now, we're going to take 5 to 10 million Mexicans and they are going into Dallas, into El Paso, into Houston, into New Mexico, into San Diego, and each one will have embedded in his mind the idea of killing ten Americans."

--Thomas Borge, Nicaragua Interior Minister as quoted in the Washington Times, March 27, 1985

[archy]

FSP and NH list ping: PorcuPING!

[One_American]

“The people of New Hampshire ought to be outraged,” she said. “These chiefs of police have become vigilantes. The fact that they wear badges does not make them less than vigilantes. A law-enforcement officer has the responsibility to protect citizens from vigilantes. At the moment the vigilantes in New Ipswich and Hudson are wearing badges.”

This is outrageous! These pro-invasion groups are basically now saying anyone who enforces immigration laws is a vigilante?

[blanknoone]

If they're criminals...

Maybe the professional protestors would handle it better, but I have tripped up quite a few liberals with this line of thinking.

Them:"If they are criminals..."

Me:"I agree completely."

Them"Really?"

Me:"Absolutely. Where we differ is that you only want to deport people who broke the laws you like, just not the laws you don't like. But that isn't the way it works. Our immigration is controlled by laws. Those who come here illegally broke those laws. I agree with you...deport those that break our laws. That is ALL illegal immigrants who have ALL broken our immigration laws."

Admittedly, this is nothing new to FReepers except for possibly the 'I agree with you' part.