What the ‘Average Joe’ Can Do About Porn…and Why - (caution; for adult readers only)

CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA.ORG ^ | MAY 24, 2005 | SARA BRODE

[cyborg]

Someone must have purchased the domain name. It sure didn't look like THAT during the Clinton era.

[cyborg]

I give up. You are a hostile person and not worth talking to.

[tacticalogic]

Ten commandments,not ten suggestions.

What's your opinion on people calling up their national representatives and urging them to legislate the First Commandment?

[Hildy]

I don't need my husband to pay attention to me all the freakin time. Some men have very high sex drives. I don't think many women would want their husband after them like that all the time. So this is a way of dealing with that drive. Now, if the man is using porn INSTEAD of being intimate with the wife, that's another story and that's not what I'm talking about here.

[Nooseman]

I consider them concubines!

[WKB]

Have a nice day

[cyborg]

okay

[FierceKulak]

You drool over Paris Hilton? You have lousy taste.

[dixiechick2000]

Bump!

[King Prout]

Cyborg,

My friend, there are those who view firearms with as much (more, actually) distaste as you view pornography, and who consider it criminal to have a gun in the same house as a child. I consider their argument of no greater merit than I do yours, for identical reasons.

I would not care if a kid of mine viewed pornography as a mature adult, any more than I would care if he or she became an avid gunner as a mature adult. Until that kid IS an adult, however, I would exercise editing control over what he or she could see and make use of.

The problem lies not in the inanimate object in question, but the unready state of the user.

Do I need to go on in greater analytical and descriptive detail, or do you now understand the point I am trying to elucidate?

[Robert_Paulson2]

"I give up. You are a hostile person and not worth talking to."

---

You are a dissembling accuser of others as has been shown by quoting your own post from this selfsame thread...

The hostility you sense is probably your own at having it pointed out.

It's probably a good idea that you give up.

[cyborg]

thanks for the bump...there's a really good set of books called 'Every Man's Battle and Every Woman's Battle'. I recommend them to anyone getting married or who are married already.

[cyborg]

We're friends so I think we should leave it at that. We have very divergent opinions about porn and probably won't ever agree.

[King Prout]

It has been a good day, and in all likelihood shall continue to be so. thank you. may you have one equally as good.

[Robert_Paulson2]

Do I need to go on in greater analytical and descriptive detail, or do you now understand the point I am trying to elucidate?

---

No it was pretty well done in the example given.
Folks just don't WANT to see it. They make money from screaming about porn, just like the gun grabbers do from screaming about guns... or smoking nazis do about cigarettes... and on and on....

Expect to be accused of working for playboy or something...
you made sense after all.

rofl.

[King Prout]

very well. see ya on the UT :)

[King Prout]

she's actually a very nice lady. seriously. I can see where you have a just grievance, but it pained me to see the two of you go at it like that.

[King Prout]

as an aside: you know FierceDraka by any chance?

[WKB]

You know SOMEMEN do require more help than
others to do many things.

[Robert_Paulson2]

I know that, and that is why it surprises me when folks go to accusing.

YOURS was a great example that shows the increasingly perilous angle and condition of our current 'slippery slope'.

And I know that doesn't make either YOU or ME a pornography proponent... My guess is, others do too.

be well.