Skip to comments.
'Star Wars' earns $108.5 million in first U.S. weekend
Yahoo News ^
| 05/22/2005
| AP
Posted on 05/22/2005 3:40:26 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: billorites
Thanks very much. I didn't think it was political, but suspected it might be like that "What the < bleep > Do We Know?" crapfest from last year. My neighbor talked me into seeing that one; what a runny-poop mess that awful waste of time turned out to be. I still shudder at the memories of observing it. The absolute
worst thing I've seen in years, and a cult-recruiting film to boot. Ick.
< /rant >
41
posted on
05/22/2005 6:12:35 PM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: Hank Rearden
"The Parrots of Telegraph Hill" could well have been a very political film, but it is not.
That's most surprising given the film maker's association, as cinematography consultant, with Michael Moore's Roger and Me movie. Talk about loathsome...
Regardless of the film maker's politics or those of Michael Bittner, it's still a very sweet and moving documentary that you can take your whole family to. I really liked it and will remember it.
42
posted on
05/22/2005 6:22:27 PM PDT
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: KillTime
The very best scene in ROTS - in all six movies for that matter - was at the opera, when Palpatine tells Anakin about "the Tragedy of Darth Plagueus" (I presume that's how it's spelled). Ian McDiarmid should win the Best Supporting Actor award for that scene alone, for he manages to communicate so much without actually saying what he means. Much of it goes past Anakin, but not all. In that moment, the audience sees just what an evil, ruthless, amoral, manipulative man Palpatine is - while the surface conversation that anyone might overhear is just an interesting tale seemingly unrelated to anything. The feral grin he lets slip when he speaks of the Sith Lord being murdered in his sleep by his apprentice strongly suggests that Palpatine
was that apprentice. He knows just how to set the hook of temptation in Anakin, who for all his impulsive, arrogant behavior becomes a sympathetic character at that point - it's clear he is way over his head in dealing with Palpatine, just as the Jedi Coucil fears.
That scene must have been written by Tom Stoppard - Lucas isn't capable of that kind of dialogue and it takes an actor of McDiarmid's caliber to pull it off.
43
posted on
05/22/2005 6:24:12 PM PDT
by
Mr. Jeeves
("Violence never settles anything." Genghis Khan, 1162-1227)
To: Mr. Jeeves
McDiarmid did outstanding work in this movie.
44
posted on
05/22/2005 6:34:27 PM PDT
by
Sloth
(I don't post a lot of the threads you read; I make a lot of the threads you read better.)
To: billorites
Thanks; I'll make a point to see it before it goes, while waiting for Star Wars to die down. I loathe crowded theaters.
45
posted on
05/22/2005 7:13:41 PM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: Mr. Jeeves
That was one of the most quietly terrifying scenes I've ever seen in a movie. It showed the absolutely seductive power of evil. Wow!
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Bingo!
Get ready for MORE remake crap....."Love Bug" too.
47
posted on
05/23/2005 11:03:13 AM PDT
by
cowboy_code
(Live by the Code!)
To: Mr. Jeeves
Indeed, it was brilliantly done. You know, it might have been Stoppard, but this kind of exposition is exactly what Lucas likes. It's a problem for him, actually. I wouldn't doubt that most of the speech was original to Lucas. It's kind of sad that McDiarmid won't win an award (maybe People's Choice) for Supporting Actor.
Something I caught: Dooku's method of execution reminded me of the greatest English performance of Cyrano de Bergerac I'd ever seen. It's a Channel 4 production with Derek Jacobi. At the end of the first scene, Cyrano cuts off the nose of his opponent in the same way. I wonder if Lucas was referencin that.
48
posted on
05/23/2005 11:10:16 AM PDT
by
AmishDude
(Join the AD fan club: "ROFL!" -- Dan from Michigan; "Very well stated, AD." -- Diana in Wisconsin)
To: billorites
Thanks for the tip; saw it this afternoon. Good film, and only a little bit hippie-dippy. Nice birdies.
But that guy, down deep, is just a bum.
49
posted on
05/23/2005 7:44:37 PM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: Hank Rearden
Yes, very hippy-dippy, but poignant and enjoyable.
He's definitely a lost soul and a gentle one, but I found him attractive and sympathetic. I wish him well. I'm pleased to see that his book has been well received and is selling. Hope his love life prospers as well.
My 11 y.o. is a bird nut. He's been talking about the film frequently since yesterday.
Speaking of hippies, when I was in college there was an "art house" movie theater run by phreaks showing that kind of movie. Now they're still running the theater and are the national distributor for The Parrots of Telegraph Hill.
50
posted on
05/23/2005 8:05:02 PM PDT
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson