Posted on 05/21/2005 11:39:05 AM PDT by Graybeard58
Presbyterian Church USA (and they are not the only ones)
http://www.pcusa.org/101/101-abortion.htm
Bill Clinton was researching racial bigotry as a cause behind church fires. There was no racial motivation in the 1990s. Some may have been antiChristian bigotry. Others were insurance claims.
The FBI determined that there was no systematic harassment.
I don't think any jury would convict you.
"During the summer of 1996, Americans were deluged with thousands of newspaper, magazine and television reports that racists were torching black churches* throughout the South. This article traces the origins and events of what appears to have been a remarkably effective campaign of disinformation."
I apologize for my late reply but I have been away for the past week. I have to be discrete here, but my information comes directly to me from a Federal investigator whose duties included these investigations. As far as knowing that these groups are real, one would have to be very naive to think they are not since most of us have had direct encounters with members.
Muleteam1
In searching online I did find that a self-identified "Luciferian" named Jay Scott Ballinger, and some associates, were arrested and sentenced in connection with church burnings. I did not find any mention of other convictions of satanists or satanic groups for church burnings in the US.
As far as knowing that these groups are real, one would have to be very naive to think they are not since most of us have had direct encounters with members.
I have never had any contact with anyone I knew to be a Satanist. If you have, how did you know that is what they were?
The fact that these investigations are still ongoing may have produced some effect in your internet search. However, it is more likely that a Federal conviction, or even an indictment, would not mention that the arsonist was a Satanist. To the logical minded, it might lend some credence to a motive for burning a Christian church but as an investigator I would be inclined to pursue a safer line of prosecution. Religious belief is the sort of information journalists dig up and report. They may not have been privy to these facts or they simply felt it did not warrant reporting.
>>I have never had any contact with anyone I knew to be a Satanist. If you have, how did you know that is what they were?<<
Possibly my life has not been as sheltered as your own, but I have personally met several admitted Satanists in my life. Some were quite serious about their foolishness and some were obviously just being rebellious. In truth, Christians have as much to fear of chastisement in modern-day American society as Satanists. Meeting either in public is not an odd event. The lack of having met admitted Satanists in one's life should not overshadow the fact that, if Christians, Muslims, Budhists, and other religions are real in America, logic dictates that Satanists also exists.
I once had a friend who didn't bother to look to his right as he entered an intersection. The fact that he did not see the car fast approaching from his right did nothing to eliminate its existence nor did it soften the fatal blow.
Muleteam1
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.