Posted on 05/19/2005 11:42:50 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
Check this out. :')
Larger animals have a tendency to be very specialized and therefore very susceptible to changes in the environment -- be that a new predator (man), the destruction or limitation of a habitat (through moving ice sheets, for example), or whatnot. Also, the larger the animal, the longer the period between generations and the fewer offspring per generation. Whereas smaller animals reproduce like it's going out of style and have relatively large numbers of offspring per generation, ensuring that at least some will make it regardless of environmental stresses, big critters like elephants have one offspring at a time and take longer to gestate and raise that offspring to reproductive age which increases the chances it won't survive that long.
Not really. During the Carboniferous period the amount of oxygen in the air was quite a bit higher, so there were large insects and ferns but relatively few large vertebrates. During the ages of the dinosaurs, most of the extent critters were actually wolf sized and smaller. Only a relatively small number of species achieved gigantic size. There were large "terror birds" right after the end of the end of that era, but most never got bigger than ostriches and moas. The largest mammal was the Indricotherium, which topped the scales at 20 tonnes, but most of its contemporaries were about the size of modern mammals.
Wonder what all that body armor was designed to repel?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.