Skip to comments.
Old Right and New Left: United Against Jews
Israel National News (Arutz 7) ^
| May 16, 2005
| Steven Zak
Posted on 05/16/2005 1:52:03 PM PDT by Alouette
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
05/16/2005 1:52:04 PM PDT
by
Alouette
To: 1st-P-In-The-Pod; A Jovial Cad; A_Conservative_in_Cambridge; adam_az; af_vet_rr; agrace; ahayes; ...
FRmail me to be added or removed from this Judaic/pro-Israel ping list.
WARNING: This is a high volume ping list
2
posted on
05/16/2005 1:53:03 PM PDT
by
Alouette
(The truth is not hard to kill, but a lie told well is immortal. -- Mark Twain)
To: Alouette
Thanks for a great post. This had not occurred to me, but it makes sense.
3
posted on
05/16/2005 1:55:40 PM PDT
by
PowerAmp
To: Alouette
I'm still trying to figure out anti-Israel Jews.
4
posted on
05/16/2005 1:59:37 PM PDT
by
JZelle
To: Alouette
I had David Duke on my old radio show & asked him that very question about whether there was any real difference between the far left & far right. He tried saying that they're completely different, but he wasn't very convincing.
5
posted on
05/16/2005 1:59:57 PM PDT
by
aynrandfreak
(When can we stop pretending that the Left doesn't by and large hate America?)
To: Alouette
Is it me or has the Far Right and Left been using the same playbook lately?
6
posted on
05/16/2005 2:03:00 PM PDT
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: redgolum
Huh? Iraq had nothing to do with Israel. Why do they get blamed for everything?
8
posted on
05/16/2005 2:10:25 PM PDT
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
To: Alouette
"They've moved so far around the political circle that they've met on the other side,..."
And majority submission to their philosophy requires their own kind of radical socialist tyranny.
9
posted on
05/16/2005 2:16:31 PM PDT
by
familyop
("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
To: TNinga
"NOTICE
According to an article in the August 7, 1997, issue of The Toledo Blade, an organization called "The New Order" has been distributing a 1980 article about the USS Liberty attack along with pamphlets calling for an investigation of the attack and others calling for an end to aid for Israel and articles in praise of Adolf Hitler.
The article quotes an Anti-Defamation League spokesman as calling The New Order "the oldest neo-Nazi group in the United States" and says it is a successor to the American Nazi Party founded by George Lincoln Rockwell.
Neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups frequently try to adopt the Liberty issue as their own.
This is an embarrassment to us, but one over which will have little control.
We wish to make it clear that we do not support their views and do not welcome or encourage their support."
--former Lt. James Ennes, Jr., USS Liberty survivor
10
posted on
05/16/2005 2:40:19 PM PDT
by
familyop
("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
To: TNinga
Does your link make this article right or wrong?
11
posted on
05/16/2005 2:45:25 PM PDT
by
rdb3
(One may smile and smile and still be a villain.)
To: redgolum
Far Right and Far Left reactions to Arafat's death were eerily, disgustingly similar.
(See "Leftists, neo-Nazis unite in mourning Arafat," posted on this website a few months ago.)
12
posted on
05/16/2005 3:12:27 PM PDT
by
anticom6
To: anticom6
Remember, the Nazi's were National SOCIALISTS! That is left wing. They rejected Marxism as a form of "failed" socialism.
13
posted on
05/16/2005 3:15:59 PM PDT
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: familyop
That link is James Ennes' website.
14
posted on
05/16/2005 3:19:10 PM PDT
by
TNinga
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
16
posted on
05/16/2005 4:07:03 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(The first duty of a leader is to make himself be loved without courting love, Andre Malraux)
To: PowerAmp
This analysis fails because it assumes Pat Buchanan is a Conservative. He is not. He is in a class by himself. He would not make a pimple on Barry Goldwater's ass.
To: Alouette
There were no WMDs. There was no connection to 9/11. Hmm, are the facts that there were no WMDs in Iraq and that 9/11 bombers were Saudies a form of antisemitism? This is rich.
18
posted on
05/16/2005 6:35:50 PM PDT
by
A. Pole
(Heraclitus: "Nothing endures but change.")
To: Alouette
The allegiance is not hatred of the Jews -- the allegiance is because both groups are alienated by the authoritarian rule of the GOP. The Democrats want their own authoritarianism to be the order of the day, and Pat Buchanan wants his stateless fascism to be the order of the day. Problem is, right now the GOP is the authoritarians ruler, holding the ever-expanding reigns of the state.
Rockwell has the most logical and consistent argument -- I do believe that the American Enterprise Institute, and the group of people that are called the "neoconservatives," have had significant intellectual influence on this administration's policies. I know that your average Republican might find it hard to believe -- but the right has its own ivory tower -- all political movments do, and it has often been said that the conflicts within a society are actually on behalf of opposing intellectual forces.
"Neoconservatives" advocated for increased authoritarianism and large-scale military endeavors -- and are not necessarily against the welfare state --- which Rockwell is against, on all counts.
Rockwell IS a Libertarian, Pat Buchanan IS a paleoconservative and Michael Moore is a liberal leftist (though, contrary to popular vision -- not the extreme left. Moore is neither an anarchist, nor a socialist.)
Buchanan certainly has a history for Jewish defamation, but it's not this which aligns him with the liberals and the libertarians -- it's the fact that right-wing authoritarianism OR neoconservatism butts up against parts of their respective ideologies -- making them turn, mostly in toward Rockwell's position.
It's textbook.
19
posted on
05/16/2005 6:50:54 PM PDT
by
MsJefferson
(Self-evident)
To: MsJefferson
ooops, sorry -- the "textbook" part is the classic "the enemy of my enemy is my friend," condition.
20
posted on
05/16/2005 6:53:22 PM PDT
by
MsJefferson
(Self-evident)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson