Skip to comments.
PAPER: Border Patrol told to stand down in Arizona
Drudge ^
Posted on 05/12/2005 8:49:57 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-213 next last
To: Spiff
41
posted on
05/12/2005 9:11:02 PM PDT
by
ConservativeMan55
(DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
To: Windcatcher
Thats possible as well. It would make more sense.
42
posted on
05/12/2005 9:11:44 PM PDT
by
ConservativeMan55
(DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
To: ConservativeMan55
If the Prsident will not protect the borders and the Representatives we elected to the Congress will not force him to protect the border or will not take the steps themselves to secure the borders --- Who will make the motions for IMPEACHMENT ???
43
posted on
05/12/2005 9:12:29 PM PDT
by
26lemoncharlie
('Cuntas haereses tu sola interemisti in universo mundo!')
To: 26lemoncharlie
I'm not sure. We need a hero....
44
posted on
05/12/2005 9:13:09 PM PDT
by
ConservativeMan55
(DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
To: seamus
45
posted on
05/12/2005 9:13:47 PM PDT
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
To: JBlain
At age 22 you really know a LOT, dontcha? LOL.
46
posted on
05/12/2005 9:16:01 PM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(Our military......the world's HEROES!)
To: JBlain
At age 22 you really know a LOT, dontcha? LOL.
47
posted on
05/12/2005 9:16:14 PM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(Our military......the world's HEROES!)
To: JBlain
nice, just nice.....
I am sure that is the best you could come up with yourself...
48
posted on
05/12/2005 9:17:32 PM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(I joined the EEEVVIILLLL Sam's Club on Friday, April 22nd, 2005.....)
To: goodnesswins
I'm 23 and I think we should protect our borders.
Just because he isn't older doesn't mean he is an idiot.
49
posted on
05/12/2005 9:18:04 PM PDT
by
ConservativeMan55
(DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
To: MikeinIraq
I HATE anonymous sources.....Unnamed sources are in vogue.
To: potlatch
Thank you for the ping.
:~)
51
posted on
05/12/2005 9:18:05 PM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
("Viva La Migra" - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
To: goodnesswins
Um I know that it's an impeachable offense to give an order that is in conflict with a STANDING law.
To: ConservativeMan55
53
posted on
05/12/2005 9:18:49 PM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
("Viva La Migra" - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
To: ConservativeMan55
Well, good for you.....but do the TWO of YOU really know an ORDER like this came from the PRESIDENT......???? And, btw, I never said anything about "idiot".....
54
posted on
05/12/2005 9:19:42 PM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(Our military......the world's HEROES!)
To: Happy2BMe
55
posted on
05/12/2005 9:19:42 PM PDT
by
ConservativeMan55
(DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
To: seamus
The reason I want to be careful is that if true it is an impeachable offense if the order originated from the WH.
56
posted on
05/12/2005 9:19:59 PM PDT
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
To: goodnesswins
I'd like to find out who it came from.
57
posted on
05/12/2005 9:20:34 PM PDT
by
ConservativeMan55
(DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
To: ConservativeMan55
Well...duh, wouldn't we all!
58
posted on
05/12/2005 9:20:51 PM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(Our military......the world's HEROES!)
To: Walkingfeather
Impeachment now. This order violates every oath ever taken.
59
posted on
05/12/2005 9:21:02 PM PDT
by
Ron in Acreage
(Democrat or Communist? Is there a difference?)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist; ConservativeMan55; Unknown Freeper; Walkingfeather; JBlain; ...
Theodore Roosevelt
"The President is merely the most important among a large number of public servants. He should be supported or opposed exactly to the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct, his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able, and disinterested service to the Nation as a whole. Therefore it is absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when he does right. Any other attitude in an American citizen is both base and servile. To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else." "Roosevelt in the Kansas City Star", 149 May 7, 1918
|
60
posted on
05/12/2005 9:21:30 PM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
("Viva La Migra" - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-213 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson