This ones starting to stink badly...
Posted on 05/07/2005 5:55:46 AM PDT by johnny7
By Kendall's presesence... this case is HOT!
Your article in the New Orleans Times Picayune May 7, 2005http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-3/1115447139105270.xml
I take issue with the following quotes:
"As his civil case loses ground in court, Paul has seen his legal problems mount."
..a meritless civil suit brought by Peter paul, and have succeeded in having most of that suit dismissed."
If you will review the narrative on www.hillcap.org, you will see the facts surrounding the progress of Paul v Clinton contradict the supposition you have reported based on David Kendall's misleading analysis.
My legal problems have been diminishing since the government finally allowed me to return to the US in September, 2003. The charges filed against me in california were dismissed in January, 2005, and the charges in NY were greatly diminished in a superseding indictment filed by the govcernment in May, 2004. There was no $50 million stock fraud, there was only a violation of SEC Reg 10(b)5 in the way I traded my own stock in accounts I legally held at Merrill Lynch.My allocution, prepared by the government, and the superseding indictment confirm that. So in fact my legal problems have been diminishing dramatically after I first blew the whistle on the Clintons in March, 2001.
David Kendall is parroting his mantra that my civil suit, Paul v Clintons et al, is meritless and most of it has been dismissed. First, he is insulting the integrity and capability of the California judiciary, which listened to his arguments at the trial level, the appellate level and then at the California Supreme Court - and they all agreed that the first ever suit alleging a President and Senator conspired with others to defraud a business associate had sufficient merit to proceed on its substantive charges! That shows that the entire California judiciary believes the suit has sufficient merit to cause a President and Senator to prepare for trial. David Kendall owes an apology to those jurists who thought his arguments to throw out the case against his clients had no merit.
The civil case, as a result, is now primed for discovery, which will demonstrate through evidence and witness testimony that Hillary Clinton orchestrated the biggest campaign finance fraud in US history, for which she is allowing her functionary, former finance director David Rosen, face a first ever trial for election fraud, committed at her behest. For any legal questions on this suit, feel free to talk with Robert Levy, public interest lawyer and 1st amendment litigator in Los Angeles, (phone number redacted by DFU).
In the future, I would hope you make the rudimentary journalistic effort to at least give the appearance of impartiality and professionalism, and that you make a minimal effort to obtain some response from a principal in your story before you report subjective conclusions based on a clearly biased mouthpiece for the malevolent parties.
Peter Paul
Make sure you see Peter's response to the author. I hope everyone reads the entire article. Rosen knows he is being played by those who want to save Hillary.
Your insightful comments? Or, would that be incite-ful?
Looks like the worms are turning.
Hillery is finally experiencing the first lesson of being a shark,
don't ever bleed.
"... is "losing ground" in court."
Translation: Oh geeeeeez! This guy has tapes and everything - quick - start downplaying the whole thing.
Hannity has been covering this. But .. when the trial begins - FOX may pick it up.
Duh. Do ya think, David? Do ya think?
Tony Snow is on it big time. When Drudge finally pays attention and puts up a banner headline, all hell will break loose.
Ping
And .. along with the Cisneros Report which is due out in June .. it could get real exciting for the dems as they scurry to CYA.
According to Tony Snow (who has an inside source) .. this report names names - and it's got some pretty nasty stuff in it.
Ping
It sure looks like this whole stink is 'off-limits' to the MSM by orders of the commisars.
If I took the fall for you...will you do what you should do
And promise I won't die
I've seen what you've done before...I know what could be in store
We all know you've lied
If I took the fall for you...I must be sure you will keep your word...be true
I know you, Hillary
So I want your signature...and notarized
I want video, for sure...so there is evidence
If some day my body's found, stone cold
There is nothing you won't do, I am told
And I want a country club...not Attica
This one chance you shouldn't flub...or I'll sing like a bird
You won't like what I will say, my dear
Your involvement I will make very clear
Two years is all I will do
And, finally, here's my last demand of you
A big Swiss bank account
A big fat Swiss bank account
> along with the Cisneros Report which is due out in June
I thought the dems had attached an amendment to cut off funding for the lengthy, expensive (yada yada) Cisneros investigation. But the report's going to come out after all? Excellent!
"By Kendall's presesence... this case is HOT!"
Exactly correct!!
Oh good!
Rush announced it yesterday on his program. Officially - the amendment was REMOVED IN COMMITTEE.
Rush also said that Hillary's lawyers are pouring over portions of the report.
I hope they are very worried .. because that usually leads them to make some major errors in judgement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.