Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Explosive memo reveals Darwinist strategy for Kansas
World Net Daily ^ | May 6, 2005 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 05/06/2005 7:15:23 AM PDT by 26lemoncharlie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last

1 posted on 05/06/2005 7:15:23 AM PDT by 26lemoncharlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha

Here 'ya go, mate.


2 posted on 05/06/2005 7:22:00 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha

Ping


3 posted on 05/06/2005 7:22:11 AM PDT by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie
My strategy at this point is the same as it was in 1999: notify the national and local media about what's going on and portray them in the harshest light possible, as political opportunists, evangelical activists, ignoramuses, breakers of rules, unprincipled bullies, etc.

There may no way to head off another science standards debacle, but we can sure make them look like asses as they do what they do.

Our target is the moderates who are not that well educated about the issues, most of whom probably are theistic evolutionists. There is no way to convert the creationists.
-Liz Craig

FYI…Parent Sues Evolutionist, Claiming She Defames Him in Anti-Creationist Article

4 posted on 05/06/2005 7:31:24 AM PDT by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie
as a life member of the nra and a veteran i consider myself to be solidly conservative. however this anti-evolution movement rivals the radical liberals in wacko-extremism. these same kind of people persecuted and burned scientists in the middle-ages and now wish to replace science with religion. pursuing this agenda will only weaken the conservative movement and alienate the moderates we need to keep radical democrats out of government.
5 posted on 05/06/2005 7:32:34 AM PDT by thejokker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thejokker

They are Neo-Muslims out to destroy the Christian laws that this country was founded upon. If you have been reading and take a very broad view the Christian World has been under attack for quite a while.

Our Schools, churches, Courts and any reference to God in public places have come under attack. The Soldiers of Christendom must answer to call to protect and defend the Laws of God and this Country and the Laws instituted by Christian Men using the Holy Bible as a guideline.

The Big NON-Argument that there is a seperation between Church and State has NO Basis!! On the Contrary, the Bible and the Laws of God were used to establish this country. Every Article can be found or referenced in the Bible. The Secularist/Socialist have corrupted the menaing of our Laws and the US Constitution, to fit the EU Socialist Constitution.

The Hate Crimes Laws are nothing more than the implementation of the Values set forth in the European Socialist Manefesto. They undermine our Gurantee of Freedom of Speech by the Constitution. The Hate Crimes were put into law to do just that. We have the right to Hate just as we have the right to Love. The Constitution of the United States is slowly but surely being replaced with the Socialist Version of the European Constitution, read it for yourself:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1318061/posts?page=6#6
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1318038/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1318034/posts
http://waysandmeans.house.gov/hearings.asp?formmode=view&id=954
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1254190/posts


6 posted on 05/06/2005 7:47:42 AM PDT by 26lemoncharlie (Defend the US CONSTITUTION - Locked and Loaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thejokker

Judging from some of the evolutionists in this web site, "wacko" can be applied to them too. Just my experience. Wacko or gun-shy possibly but irrational in any case.


7 posted on 05/06/2005 7:55:07 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thejokker
It is not the scientists who are being ‘burned’… read the article.

Now, regarding this ‘wacko-extremism’ claim…The National Association of Biology Teachers [NABT] in their 1995 Official Statement on Teaching Evolution stated the following:

"The diversity of life [all life] on earth is the outcome of evolution: an unsupervised, impersonal, unpredictable and natural process of temporal descent with genetic modification that is affected by natural selection, chance, historical contingencies and changing environments."
It took seven years of prodding from conservative groups before they revised the statement. According to the NABT's executive director, the change was made "to avoid taking a religious position" that might offend believers. The two words that were removed from their statement were; 'unsupervised' and 'impersonal'. Their statement boldly claimed that there was no intelligent cause (force, etc.) behind mankind and all existence.

Did conservatives do the right thing here or were they just ‘wacko-extremists’?

8 posted on 05/06/2005 8:04:34 AM PDT by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie

Education Board will make its final vote with their prehensile tails.


9 posted on 05/06/2005 8:05:21 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thejokker

I'm glad to see the scientists are fighting back.

We're already behind many other countries in our support of science and research and our basic defense infrastructure.


10 posted on 05/06/2005 8:07:57 AM PDT by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie; PatrickHenry

I must have missed it - where was the "explosive" memo?


11 posted on 05/06/2005 8:11:35 AM PDT by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: From many - one.

I thought the scientists decided they were not going to fight back and were boycotting the meeting.


12 posted on 05/06/2005 8:12:32 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie

So what is new?


13 posted on 05/06/2005 8:15:01 AM PDT by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

mem·o·ran·dum   Audio pronunciation of "memorandum" ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (mm-rndm)
n. pl. me·mo·ran·dums or me·mo·ran·da (-d)
  1. A short note written as a reminder.
  2. A written record or communication, as in a business office.

14 posted on 05/06/2005 8:17:27 AM PDT by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
Despite Frank and the media, conservatives regained the majority on the school board in 2004.

I notice that the writer equates conservative with anti-science; the same view is expressed by most of the liberals I know, too.

15 posted on 05/06/2005 8:26:06 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander
your correct; extremists on both sides need to be "set straight". there are many scientists who realize science and religion can/must co-exist. science is the study and observation of the universe/god's creation. the study of the theory of evolution can shed light on the process of god's creation and can reveal his message. just because some wacko-nutjob-religous extremist's private interpretation of the bible seems to be contradicted by their misperception of evolution does not justify attacking valid scientific study.

it is up to scientists to decide what science is, NOT your minister...
16 posted on 05/06/2005 8:27:22 AM PDT by thejokker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past; ohioWfan; Fiddlstix; mikeus_maximus; johnnyb_61820; Aquinasfan; ...

Ping-a-ling to self and all

self for later, y'all right now!

ID?

Of course.


17 posted on 05/06/2005 8:28:28 AM PDT by MacDorcha (Where Rush dares not tread, there are the Freepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
pushing a radical agenda will do that; radical conservatives can be just as detrimental to our liberty as radical liberals. i will not support a conservative candidate who supports a anti-evolution agenda. pushing this agenda will lose votes and support for a conservative platform.
18 posted on 05/06/2005 8:30:18 AM PDT by thejokker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: thejokker
You got it. This antiscience nonsense is going to clobber the Republicans and conservatism nationally. You can't go along with this stuff and pretend to be rational at the same time.
19 posted on 05/06/2005 8:32:14 AM PDT by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie

When you don't have the evidence, pound the table!


20 posted on 05/06/2005 8:32:28 AM PDT by metacognative (eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson