Skip to comments.
Man Sues Over Daughter's Roller Coaster Death (Stupid Alert!)
The Indy Channel ^
| May 4, 2005
| A.P.
Posted on 05/04/2005 1:57:52 PM PDT by Abathar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
When in the h3ll did it become ok to sue people even after everything points to utter stupidity as the cause? This Rabbi needs to accept the fact he bred an imbocile and move on, and the lawyers publically flogged in front of the courthouse doors.
1
posted on
05/04/2005 1:57:54 PM PDT
by
Abathar
To: Abathar
SANTA CLAUS, Ind.
LOL. So appropriate given what this lawsuit-happy dad is trying to pull.
2
posted on
05/04/2005 2:00:29 PM PDT
by
A Balrog of Morgoth
(With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the Rats in terror before me.)
To: Abathar
When in the h3ll did it become ok to sue people even after everything points to utter stupidity as the cause? When the first lawyer was vomited up from Hell itself.
3
posted on
05/04/2005 2:00:58 PM PDT
by
TheBigB
(Can we shave some fuzz off these woofers?)
To: Abathar
Man! The more I read, the more I begin to think Darwin was correct!
Unbelievable!
4
posted on
05/04/2005 2:01:03 PM PDT
by
jrestrepo
To: Abathar
If the case is going to be about woulda, coulda, shoulda, the how about the parent's responsibility to teach the child to heed warnings? I'll bet they never made her buckle up in the family auto, either.
5
posted on
05/04/2005 2:02:33 PM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(The murder of Terri Schindler Schiavo - NOT IN OUR NAME)
To: TheBigB
""When the first lawyer was vomited up from Hell itself.""
Is that where they come from? I always thought they came from unprotected anal sex myself.
6
posted on
05/04/2005 2:02:36 PM PDT
by
Abathar
(Proudly catching hell for not reading the whole article since 1999)
To: Abathar
This is a local, family owned amusement park. Some moron decides to do something suicidal and the family expects somebody to pay for it. I wish some judges would grow some ____ and start awarding damages to the defendants in these kinds of cases. In my opinion the park was financially damaged by the publicity from the death. The woman's estate should cover that cost.
7
posted on
05/04/2005 2:02:58 PM PDT
by
JustRight
To: Abathar
We have a society that needs to blame someone (anyone) else and never admit personal responsibility. That is compounded in this case by the fact that her father suffered a terrible loss and doesn't want to see his daughter's fault so he's going to blame anyone he can.
8
posted on
05/04/2005 2:04:41 PM PDT
by
VRWCisme
To: Abathar
Fellner, 32, of New York City A 32-year-old who stands up on amusement park rides?
9
posted on
05/04/2005 2:05:25 PM PDT
by
Alouette
(Proudly overpopulating the planet since 1972.)
To: A Balrog of Morgoth
It would be like someone that gets out of the driver's seat of a moving vehicle and get's on the roof and kills themselves, then mom and pop come along and sue the automaker claiming they should make a way so "stupid" people shouldn't be able to climb out of the car while it's moving LOL :) :) :)
10
posted on
05/04/2005 2:05:29 PM PDT
by
1FASTGLOCK45
(FreeRepublic: More fun than watching Dem'Rats drown like Turkeys in the rain! ! !)
To: JustRight
This is a local, family owned amusement park. Some moron decides to do something suicidal and the family expects somebody to pay for it. I wish some judges would grow some ____ and start awarding damages to the defendants in these kinds of cases. In my opinion the park was financially damaged by the publicity from the death. The woman's estate should cover that cost. Agree completely! - We need tort reform in the vein of....what you sue for...if you lose....you pay to the person you sued!
To: jrestrepo
Man! The more I read, the more I begin to think Darwin was correct!
If Darwin were correct, there should be FEWER stupid people around today. I see no evidence of that trend.
12
posted on
05/04/2005 2:07:36 PM PDT
by
beezdotcom
(I'm usually either right or wrong...)
To: Abathar
I fail to see what more they could have done to prevent this idiot from undoing her safety belt and standing up, short of chaining her to the seat and locking it.
But they couldn't do that, because being locked into your seat, unable to release it in case of a different kind of accident, would be a much worse safety hazard.
Ergo, there was nothing more they could possibly be expected to do in this case.
13
posted on
05/04/2005 2:07:50 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: 1FASTGLOCK45
they should make a way so "stupid" people shouldn't be able to climb out of the car while it's moving LOL :) :) :)
Just read the warning lables on some of the stuff laying around your house. :)
14
posted on
05/04/2005 2:08:18 PM PDT
by
A Balrog of Morgoth
(With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the Rats in terror before me.)
To: JustRight
This is a local, family owned amusement park. This was a local, family owned amusement park. Now it's a bloodsucking-attorney-owned amusement park.
15
posted on
05/04/2005 2:08:39 PM PDT
by
savedbygrace
("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
To: 1FASTGLOCK45
Wonder what was going through her mind as she was sailing through the air? /Sarcasm
16
posted on
05/04/2005 2:09:03 PM PDT
by
Americanexpat
(A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
To: TheBigB
When the first lawyer was vomited up from Hell itself. I beg to differ with you, Sir- I must significantly differ with you.
Lawyers pre-date Hell, you do you think drew up the contracts for its construction?
To: Alouette
A 32-year-old who stands up on amusement park rides?
They runoff on crosscountry bus adventures too.
18
posted on
05/04/2005 2:11:10 PM PDT
by
A Balrog of Morgoth
(With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the Rats in terror before me.)
To: Alouette
Tamar FellnerSadly ironic name.
To: Abathar
Officials concluded that she stood up while the ride was moving. "Hey, watch this!"
20
posted on
05/04/2005 2:12:40 PM PDT
by
SIDENET
(Yankee Air Pirate)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson