  |
"Umm, better it is, yes, to a clitoris have deep in your throat than to no clitoris have at all! There is no try, there is only do!" |
Posted on 05/04/2005 7:14:23 AM PDT by dead
One day, people will value the uncut, undoctored originals over the remade/remodeled "official" versions. All that re-re-re-editing smacks too much of revisionism.
Two follow-ups:
1. Bought the soundtrack yesterday. It comes with a DVD that is basically a 70 minute music (John Williams) video that tells the entire 6 episode story. My son and I loved it! Scenes from the new film are included.
2. My son loves Jar Jar. I know I know - but after reading the comments yesterday, I got to thinking - so what if parts were inane/childish? My son and I are having a blast and enjoying a great story together. It's given us some great opportunities to talk about good and evil.
Also - as some as noted - I think the darkness of this one will make up for Jat Jar.
JMHO
|
"Umm, better it is, yes, to a clitoris have deep in your throat than to no clitoris have at all! There is no try, there is only do!" |
Not to mention total ingratitude for the people who made the author his fortune. Lucas definitely has a God-complex.
It's not revisionism. It's revision. Authors do it all the time, though it's less common in fiction than it used to be. And it was never "uncut" or "undoctored" -- it was cut and doctored by George Lucas to begin with.
I've never seen a Star Wars flick. Any reason to start now?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.