Posted on 05/03/2005 12:49:51 PM PDT by areafiftyone
Note that the Laut did not condemn his Colorado Colleague for labelling Dobson "THE ANTICHRIST."
Is Lautenberg responsible for Michael Moore?
Are Democrat Senators, admittedly an endangered species, responsible for Howard Dean when he says "Republicans are brain dead", "I hate Republicans", and "This is good vs. evil and we're the good".
What does Frist have to do with this? I hope that Frist just ignores the letter.
Frank's still breathing? Who knew?
I don't see it as a senior moment. Which is a larger long term threat? External terrorists bringing us to our knees, or socialists destroying our republic from within? Different threasts, requiring completely different responses, but both very serious.
Tell him to go pound sand. The liberals want to introduce communism in this country through the judicial oligarchy.
Senator Lautenberg, how about the RAT party condemning Ward "little Eichmann" Churchill?
Barely
This is disingenuous of Lautenberg and he knows it. Robertson was talking about the last 100 years of the judiciary and what it has done to seriously undermine our system. He was not saying that the terrorists were not dangerous...he has devoted hundreds of hours of airtime to denouncing terrorism.
I think Robertson was right. Fighting terrorist and foreign enemies we've always done well. It's the internal, scheming enemies from within that we have to really watch out for if we don't want to go the way of Rome.
Once again the Dems are spinning their wheels on useless things instead of coming up with substantive solutions to our country's problems.
I am definitely not a Pat Robertson fan, but he actually seemed to make some sense, in terms of the long view of culture. Laut is hyperventilating and trying to create a controversy out of nothing when he says that Robertson displayed a "cavalier" attitude toward 9/11. I didn't see a "cavalier" attitude; jst a comparison between an event (9/11) and a long series of events (judicial decisions).
Why do the liberals always get their britches in a wad when a conservative says something they don't like.?
Nevermind that liberals write books on killing the president, saying the president planned and or knew about 9-11, and on it goes....
Republicans should demand they apologize, but if they did, the liberals would say, " we have no control over what they say", actually good come back for Frist.
I bet you Lautenberg picked on Frist because Pat Robertson said Frist would never be president and Guiliani would in that same interview. Lautenberg wants to see Frist angry and hopes that Frist will remember that.
These Democrats are really deeply into condemnation.
Too bad they can't do anything useful.
So Robertson is right, Lautenberg paraphrased the comments to suit his own sick mind and say what he wished Robertson had said. Terrorist have a short effect, the radical judges we have have an much greater impact not only today but years to come.
well well so old frank got his depends in a knot I see.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.