Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oil Reserves Are Increasing
educateyourself.org ^ | April 6, 2005 | George Crispin

Posted on 05/03/2005 7:20:50 AM PDT by StoneGiant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
For all the "peak oil" prognosticators....
1 posted on 05/03/2005 7:20:51 AM PDT by StoneGiant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

It is too bad that we don't have the refinery capacity to process all the oil. Thanks to the socialist enviromentalist.


2 posted on 05/03/2005 7:28:07 AM PDT by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

there was a thread 3-4 days ago discussing the biggest Saudi field......gist was that they were pumping a million barrels of water into it daily and that the returns are STILL diminishing.

Possibly the dynamic explained in the above piece is limited to a few places? Who knows what to believe any more?


3 posted on 05/03/2005 7:30:26 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

About 10 years ago I came across this theory in an article about some Texas oil wells that were getting refilled from someplace and have been arguing it ever since with people that think I am crazy. I am a believer in this theory.


4 posted on 05/03/2005 7:35:10 AM PDT by smag999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant
For all the "peak oil" prognosticators....

So let me see if I understand this correctly. One oil field off the coast of Louisiana is doing something odd and that debunks "peak oil"? Almost every other oil field in America is being stripped via secondary and tertiary recovery methods and is experiencing both declining reserves and declining production. Why are these fields not recharging too? There is still lots of oil left but it is being found in smaller and deeper and more expensive pockets. Eventually we get to the point where it takes a barrel of oil to find, drill for and produce a barrel of oil. At that point, it does not matter how much is still in the ground because if the net energy equation is zero it does not make sense.

I'm no doom and gloomer though. Let's build safe, clean nukes.

5 posted on 05/03/2005 7:35:52 AM PDT by jackbenimble (Import the third world, become the third world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

The problem with this theory is that all the components are not known. Say it takes three things for the earth to continue to produce crude. We do not know what all three are or how the work or when one of them will suddenly disappear. We have no way or predicting when this process will stop or how suddenly it can stop. Betting the future of our world on unknown factors is STUPID!!!!!


6 posted on 05/03/2005 7:36:17 AM PDT by oldenuff2no (Proud Nam Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

Perhaps we need more refineres!


7 posted on 05/03/2005 7:36:28 AM PDT by -=Wing_0_Walker=- (Don't spit in my eye and charge me for eyewash!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant
Gold’s theory is not yet accepted by all scientists, probably all the more reason to trust it.

Things don't quite work that way. Sometimes scientists are right, sometimes they are wrong. However, that does not therefore indicate that, because most scientists do not adhere to this theory, that is a good indication that the theory is true.

8 posted on 05/03/2005 7:37:13 AM PDT by dirtboy (Drooling moron since 1998...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

Funny how all this primordial oil only seems to be found in sedimentary source rock.


9 posted on 05/03/2005 7:38:12 AM PDT by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant
One field with freak conditions is hardly enough to support a theory.

Tens of thousands of other fields, in fact, all but a handful, have gone dry just as originally predicted.

Every attempt to drill for the "primordial soup" has been a failure.

And following geological theory of where Oil & Gas should be if they are of organic origin is still the best way to find it.

So9

10 posted on 05/03/2005 7:42:00 AM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

If the theory is true, that doe not mean that the Earth will produce petroleum as fast as we are pumping it.

Also, production may be higher in some areas than others.

I don't know how many Marxist, enivronmentalist lemmings think that all conservatives want to destroy the Earth at any cost, so long as we get to do what we want, but I am a Republican/Libertarian that thinks that renewable, less-poluting energy sources are important, and I can't wait to see more of it.

I also believe that if the world discovered that oil was unlimited, that it would reduce the speed at which we bring alternative energies to the forefront.


11 posted on 05/03/2005 7:42:18 AM PDT by Miykayl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

BTTT


12 posted on 05/03/2005 7:48:25 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

wouldn't it be funny if they were inadvertently pumping their reserves over to the one in the Gulf of Mexico


13 posted on 05/03/2005 7:49:10 AM PDT by 3dognight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jackbenimble
I'm no doom and gloomer though. Let's build safe, clean nukes.

I'd like to but I don't think I can fit one in my car.

14 posted on 05/03/2005 7:49:35 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (In God We Trust. All Others We Monitor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

This kinda counters that "We're going to lose our standard of living cuz there's no more oil pretty soon" article.


15 posted on 05/03/2005 7:51:38 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Not Elected Pope Since 4/19/2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant
My brother-in-law is the vice President of a major oil field service company who believes, at least in part, to the theories in this article. He as well has no good explanation to the continuation of oil production in fields once thought tapped out. He says, anyplace, nearly anyway, in the world where they want to drill they can find something as long as they put the hole in the right place and deep enough. It may be heavy oil or gas or decent crude but it is not always enough to make it economically feasible. So they tend to stay in areas where they have equipment, crews, knowledge of the area and the mineral rights. Essentially, there is a lot of inertia to seek other fields.
16 posted on 05/03/2005 7:52:51 AM PDT by Final Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

I guess the sky is not falling after all........


17 posted on 05/03/2005 7:53:14 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jackbenimble

For decades I have wondered how on earth the oil fields we have been drawing down ever made it thru millions of years of geologic plate movements, earthquakes, fissures, and pressures, etc., especially since the period of formation under current theory was over more millions of years ago.

Please explain to me how these oil fields survived all this tumultous geologic activity for eons unless SOME of them are being replenished from subterranean forces through cracks and fissures.


18 posted on 05/03/2005 8:00:35 AM PDT by smag999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: StoneGiant

I read about this a couple of months ago but have heard nothing since. The gougers at the oil companies will be jumping off ledges if the myth of declining supply proves a lie. That's the scam they've been using to rob us for half a century now.


19 posted on 05/03/2005 8:02:46 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smag999
About 10 years ago I came across this theory in an article about some Texas oil wells that were getting refilled from someplace and have been arguing it ever since with people that think I am crazy. I am a believer in this theory.

There may be something to Gold's theory, but a few examples of wells being larger than previously thought doesn't prove anything. All it really means is that the geologists didn't have the full picture of the reserves to begin with. It totally reasonable to assume that geologists miss a reserve just below the one that they are drilling, and that the below one bubbles up as they drill the upper one.

20 posted on 05/03/2005 8:02:46 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson