Posted on 04/25/2005 7:10:15 AM PDT by ZGuy
As a historian, this makes me nuts! FYI: Garry Nash, quoted in the article, is an extremely left-wing historian. Views everything through the prism of class.
It will always be A.D. for me.
Either that, or we could key everything to the date the U.N. was founded. That's what they want anyway, isn't it?
These people are motivated only by their hatred of God Himself.
What in the world does "common era" mean? It's BS.
When I hear archeologists and historians using this terminology, it drives me crazy. The PC crowd won't be satisfied until they eliminate Christ completely.
"common era" = "after Christ"
What a bunch of transparent and shallow blowhards!
When the Nazis came for the communists,
I did not speak out
because I was not a communist.
When they came for the social democrats,
I did not speak out
because I was not a social democrat.
When they came for the trade unionists
I did not speak out
because I was not a trade unionist.
When they came for the Jews
I did not speak out
because I was not a Jew;
When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.
-- Martin Niemöller
VOMIT
Last night Larry King had a panel of religious scholars, etc. discussing what happens when we die. Life after death or not. One woman, an atheist, had the gall to announce that Jesus Christ had never existed at all.
If I am watching a history documentary and they start with that BCE and CE crap, I switch the channel immediately.
Luckily, most of the history books I have read still use the proper notations of BC and AD.
Just because you don't believe Jesus was divine does not negate the reality of his birth. How ridiculous. I don't follow Mohammad, but I believe he walked the Earth!
Naive is as naive does. This effort is straight from the pit of hell, Tim.
Infuriating ain't it.
This infuriates me too, but could we refer to it as "Christain Era"? That would really send the christophodes off the deep end.
"It will always be A.D. for me."
ME, TOO!! When this crapola comes out, it makes me want to say it just to tick someone off!!
LOL. It works a lot better for the totally predictable rants that it happened in the CE (the Clinton Era).
That the expression predates Clinton by 20 years is a completely annoying fact that we will simply have to bury.
What's the problem? "BC" and "AD" are known to be at least 4 years off; "CE" and "BCE" are correct by definition.
Nothing new here. Most of your mainline seminaries (where they train clergy) have been using BCE for over 2 decades.
This only proves that sometimes the press is asleep for long periods of time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.