Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stupid airport security III (Walter E. Williams)
Townhall.com ^ | April 20, 2005 | Walter E. Williams

Posted on 04/20/2005 4:06:07 AM PDT by The Great Yazoo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: fireforeffect

The real reason the terrorist do not hijack planes any more is the passengers will kill them.



That, and because terrorists seem uninterested in the endeavor.


21 posted on 04/20/2005 8:12:38 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe; Phantom Lord; kittymyrib; fireforeffect; The Great Yazoo
Well, I've read all your responses to my post, and it seems the consensus is that the TSA isn't doing enough.

I certainly agree with that, but the gist of Walter Williams' comments is that they need to stop doing certain things.

I use the daughter test: if my daughter is going to fly somewhere, what security precautions would I accept for TSA to eliminate?

There's criticism about the prohibition against lighters. Well, let's say that 5 people in collaboration got on a plane, each with about 3 or 4 lighters on themselves or their carry-on baggage. I can conceive of an easy means whereby these 5 people could assimilate these or fewer lighters into enough of a firebomb to bring down the plane. Same thing with matches, they should also be prohibited.

Each of the objections I've read complain about little things being prohibited. Every one of these items could reasonably be used, without much imagination, in a manner and in cahoots with similar or complementary items brought by another person(s) to create a real threat.

TSA should do more, not less.

22 posted on 04/20/2005 4:33:33 PM PDT by Real Cynic No More (Al-Jazeera is to the Iraqi War as CBS was to the Vietnam War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Real Cynic No More
You did not read my post. More? No. Better. Stop going after the easy marks and search the obvious threats. Go to true random searches, many air ports let the ticket agents determine who gets searched. Where the agents/Security pick the search, they pick the ones least likely to complain.

By your logic. There should be no carry-on luggage, all luggage is sent by a separate plane. All passengers will be nude so they can not hide anything. Full X-rays to board or body cavity searches.
23 posted on 04/21/2005 5:41:50 AM PDT by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Real Cynic No More
Every one of these items could reasonably be used, without much imagination, in a manner and in cahoots with similar or complementary items brought by another person(s) to create a real threat.

And every one of those things could reasonably be used to thwart a hijacking.
I don't like depending on the government for my personal safety.

24 posted on 04/21/2005 5:56:54 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Monthly donors make better lovers. Ask my wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fireforeffect
Full X-rays to board or body cavity searches.

That might be kind of fun. Go for it.

25 posted on 04/21/2005 4:56:07 PM PDT by Real Cynic No More (Al-Jazeera is to the Iraqi War as CBS was to the Vietnam War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson