Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santa Monica Mountains land sold to state for public park land (California)
KESQ ^ | April 17, 2005 | AP

Posted on 04/17/2005 6:41:07 PM PDT by FairOpinion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: calcowgirl
Since I am gainfully unemployed (aka, retired) I still listen to Doug, but I liked it better when he was on all night.

I'll be sure and tune in this coming week to see if he mentions Mr. Stalin! I'll keep you posted.

I loved the song he played as an ode to Joe... Stalin, LOL.

With the money Joe gets, it's more like Owed to Joe. :-)

21 posted on 04/17/2005 8:50:52 PM PDT by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cosmo
35 million for 538 acres of prime SoCal land sounds like a bargain if you ask me.

$65,000 per acre is a lot of money for nature trails, particularly when they are so abundant in the area. If you charged everyone who walked on the trails $5 a visit, you'd need 6.8 million customers to pay that off.

22 posted on 04/17/2005 8:55:09 PM PDT by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DumpsterDiver

>>I'll keep you posted.

Thanks! Please do!


>>Owed to Joe. :-)

ROFL! Good one.


23 posted on 04/17/2005 9:11:20 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DumpsterDiver
Here's a few more from the prior thread:

CA: Conservancy Spending Assailed - Audit says that mountains agency misused $7 million
Los Angeles Times ^ | June 6, 2004 | Sue Fox and Andrew Blankstein

Audit accuses Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy of mismanagement
Associated Press, Jun. 06, 2004

Landed gentry - Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy accountable to no one
Los Angeles Daily News, June 7, 2004

24 posted on 04/17/2005 9:19:54 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
They've tried for years to acquire the property northwest of Los Angeles, including unsuccessful attempts through eminent domain.

At least the state has used legal methods, even if they look to be a little heavy-handed, with this property.

When the National Park Service tried to enlarge their acreage in the Santa Monica Mountains in the early '90s, they ran into fierce resistance from one Donald Scott, who didn't want to sell.

Someone informed the LA Sheriff's Department that "thousands" of marijuana plants were being cultivated on Scott's Trails End Ranch. They picked up on it and, sure enough, after a time they believed they might possibly have seen, in aerial reconnaissance of the place, some nasty cannibis plants a-growing.

That was all they needed to get a search warrant and dispatch a team of 30 law enforcement officers to . . uh . . conduct a raid on Mr. Scott's ranch which those greedy bureaucrats coveted.

Simple matter it would have been, too: Just find 14 marijuana plants anywhere on the 200-acre spread and they could seize the entire property, sell it to the NPS and turn it into a hiker's and nature-lover's paradise, sans the Scotts and their stinky weeds.

Only they screwed up and killed Scott after breaking into his darkened home (in self-defense, naturally) when the entry team wasn't invited in as expected.

And, of course, no evidence could be found that marijuana was growing anywhere on the ranch.

Which led the Ventura County District Attorney (Scott's ranch was in Ventura County, even though the address and access road was in Los Angeles County) to investigate.

And -- surprise, surprise -- what the DA uncovered!

REPORT ON THE DEATH OF DONALD SCOTT

25 posted on 04/17/2005 10:01:55 PM PDT by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravinson
If you charged everyone who walked on the trails $5 a visit, you'd need 6.8 million customers to pay that off.

Check your premises, ravinson.

First, nature nuts don't believe in charging for stuff that relates to their religion. First Amendment and such, get it?

And why do you think anyone involved is even slightly interested in "paying it off?"

We the taxpayers owe it to them, doncha know?

26 posted on 04/17/2005 10:06:18 PM PDT by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: logician2u
It may be legal... but IMO the environmentalist tactics are criminal. Their expansion was hardly excessive and the alternative mentioned was to expand a campus 75 miles away?

Environmentalists beat Soka University—again
By John Loesing
March 13, 2003

MICHAEL COONS/The Acorn COURTROOM LOSS--Any hope to expand the Soka University of America campus in Calabasas has been shot down in a courtroom. Now opponents want to acquire the site of the campus.

Opponents of Soka University are celebrating in the wake of a recent court ruling that finally closes the book on any plans for campus expansion, but despite their victory, Soka opponents are still pressing the attack.

On Feb. 27, the Second Court of Appeal overturned a California Coastal Commission permit that would have allowed the Mulholland Highway school near Calabasas to more than double in size to 440,000 square feet and accommodate increased enrollment from 100 students to 650.

The ruling reinforces a 2001 appeals court decision that struck down a development agreement between Soka University and Los Angeles County in which the new construction was first approved.

The end of the decade-long legal struggle to increase the size of the rural Santa Monica Mountains campus is prompting some groups to call for a closing of the school altogether.

The request by the Sierra Club, Save Open Space and the Monte Nido Valley Community Association represents a first-time attempt by local environmental groups not only to prevent new construction, but also force an existing enterprise to vacate.

"Now is the time for public officials and Soka Gakkai to seize the opportunity and agree on a mutually beneficial transaction that once-and-forever leaves this exceptional property as a legacy for the people of the state of California," said Save Open Space boardmember Mary Wiesbrock in a statement.

In its ruling against the coastal permit, the appeals court said the commission failed to perform an independent evaluation of other, environmentally superior alternatives. The court also faulted the commission for relying on the county’s 1997 environmental impact report, which a later judge found to be inadequate.

"The problem with the [Los Angeles] County and Soka’s position is that, in fact, [Coastal] Commission, regardless of its independent documentation, never considered any alternatives other than those set out in the county’s FEIR [Final Environmental Impact Report]," said the court. "Those alternatives were legally inadequate."

Opponents argued that the Calabasas expansion wasn’t needed because of the 2001 opening of a second campus on 103 acres in Aliso Viejo, near Laguna Beach. The court suggested the Coastal Commission should have studied the possibility of placing the expansion at the school’s new campus in Orange County instead of in the environmentally sensitive Santa Monica Mountains.

The fledgling Orange County campus reportedly has encountered student morale and budgetary problems. Primary funding for both campuses comes from the Soka Gakkai Buddhist sect of Japan.

"What makes environmental sense for the public makes education and economic sense for Soka," said Frank Angel, an attorney for Sierra Club.

Angel expressed hope that "something good for all parties, including Soka, may come out of Soka’s difficulties, if Soka seizes the opportunity of securing for itself a one-time, multimillion dollar cash infusion—and tremendous public good will—by selling its Santa Monica Mountains land holdings to the state and consolidating all its California-based educational operations in Aliso Viejo, which has added benefits in terms of economies of scale and cutting the costs of running two under-used campuses."

A Soka spokesman said the current economy has created some concerns, but that the school has no plans to consolidate campuses.

"We haven’t come to that point yet," said Arnold Kawasaki, a Soka spokesman. "We’re focusing on perfecting our educational program … We always think about what’s best for the student and the best educational environment we can create."

Soka, which opened locally in 1987, owns 588 acres near the intersection of Mulholland Highway and Las Virgenes Road. The 119,500 square-foot campus occupies 12 of those acres and the rest is mostly open space.

The Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy tried to acquire the property in the early 1990s through eminent domain, but agreed to stop its condemnation effort in return for Soka’s promise not to continue with countersuits.

In 1998, Los Angeles Superior Court ruled favorably on the environmental impact report for Soka’s expansion, but a subsequent ruling overturned the decision.

27 posted on 04/18/2005 2:46:14 AM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

As I type this, Doug is on a rant about Edmiston, private property rights, the abuses of eminent domain, government/bureauocracies running roughshod over citizens etc.


28 posted on 04/18/2005 5:21:13 AM PDT by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: logician2u; calcowgirl; Issaquahking; tubebender; ElkGroveDan; Carry_Okie
If Crighton ever makes a movie out of his book "State of Fear," I hope he opens it with the murder scene from this true story!!!

I'm bookmarking this thread because you posted this reply because the story just keeps fading away and it shouldn't! Dan Lundgren, who couldn't beat Gray Davis, just got elected to CONgress from the Sacramento area and I wasn't the least bit excited about it, remembering how he was absolutely no help as Attorney General of CA on this case!!!

This Scott case epitomized the crazed State of mind of GovernMental EnvironMentalists that I keep calling GANG-GREEN that have infected CA's government officials, from top, to bottom!!!

29 posted on 04/18/2005 7:17:52 AM PDT by SierraWasp (The "Heritage Oaks" in the Sierra-Nevada Conservancy are full of parasitic GovernMental mistletoe!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl; SierraWasp; Carry_Okie; hedgetrimmer
The request by the Sierra Club, Save Open Space and the Monte Nido Valley Community Association represents a first-time attempt by local environmental groups not only to prevent new construction, but also force an existing enterprise to vacate.

I wonder if they will tear down the campus in order to return the land to a pre-columbian state? My suspicion is that they will turn the campus into housing for park rangers....but then again, I'm a little jaded when it comes to this sort of thing........

30 posted on 04/18/2005 7:30:57 AM PDT by forester (An economy that is overburdened by government eventually results in collapse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; Carry_Okie; farmfriend; calcowgirl; tubebender; Issaquahking; hedgetrimmer; ...
"I thought CA already owns too much property..."

The CA "Wildlife Conservation Board," a division of CA Fish & Game, is the out-of-control agency that funds this and will fund hundreds and maybe thousands of such purchases in the Sierre-Nevada CONservancy!!!

Thanks for posting this as it is exactly why I have been "freaking out" over Arnold's adoption of the SNC from the beginning!!! Nobody else, probably including you, had any idea there was an amply funded State Real Estate buying agency just waiting for this Robert F. Kennedy wet(lands) dream to be brought to life by Senor Schwarzenegger!!!

Yes, after having spent the last decade uncovering this plot and fighting it with everything I had(literally), maybe you can see now why it makes me so crazy that people see nothing really wrong with the SNC... (to be continued)

31 posted on 04/18/2005 7:32:15 AM PDT by SierraWasp (The "Heritage Oaks" in the Sierra-Nevada Conservancy are full of parasitic GovernMental mistletoe!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: logician2u; FairOpinion; DoughtyOne; Southack; South40; Grampa Dave; Dog Gone; snopercod; Lurker; ..
Reply #25 Ping, Once again!!! It's not the "untold story!" It's the story told many times over and at great length each time, but nobody gives a damn story... The "this can't happen in America," story!!!

Now we shall see how many more times this type of story plays out in the huge new Schwarzenegger Sierra-Nevada CONservancy that sets the same stage as the Santa Monica CONservancy, but covering 1/5th of eastern CA... The Conservative (red voting counties) part of CA!!!

32 posted on 04/18/2005 7:44:00 AM PDT by SierraWasp (The "Heritage Oaks" in the Sierra-Nevada Conservancy are full of parasitic GovernMental mistletoe!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
It is the District Attorney's opinion that the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department was motivated, at least in part, by a desire to seize and forfeit the ranch for the government. While the National Park Service could indirectly obtain this land, there is no evidence that it instigated or played a significant role in the forfeiture plan. Based in part upon the possibility of forfeiture, Spencer obtained a search warrant that was not supported by probable cause. This search warrant became Donald Scott's death warrant.

Reading the summary, it appears that the Sherriff's Dep't didn't plan on killing Scott, they only wanted to steal his ranch. Wonder if the enviros will name the Santa Monica Park vistors center after Scott? Knowing them, they will name it after deputy Spencer.

33 posted on 04/18/2005 7:45:22 AM PDT by forester (An economy that is overburdened by government eventually results in collapse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DumpsterDiver; calcowgirl

Thanks for keeping this alive so that the blinded may still see!!! (if only they would)


34 posted on 04/18/2005 7:46:21 AM PDT by SierraWasp (The "Heritage Oaks" in the Sierra-Nevada Conservancy are full of parasitic GovernMental mistletoe!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Can I now sue the state if a Mt Lion attacks me there?


35 posted on 04/18/2005 7:48:15 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I thought CA already owns too much property...

What's the surprise? You were warned.

You supported takings like this when you chose to back Arnold.

36 posted on 04/18/2005 7:48:16 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (And the Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Los Angeles Daily News

Purchase of 'crown jewel' parkland celebrated

By Jason Kandel Staff Writer

Sunday, April 17, 2005 - With picturesque mountain ridges as a backdrop on Saturday, more than 100 preservationists celebrated the purchase of nearly 600 acres of Soka University in the Santa Monica Mountains as public parkland.

The $35 million parkland, part of the former King Gillette Ranch and considered the "crown jewel" of the Santa Monica Mountains, will boast miles of hiking trails near streams and sites of ancient Chumash Indian settlements.

"This is the day the Lord made. Be glad and rejoice in it," Los Angeles County Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky quoted from the Bible. "He isn't making too many more days like this with these kinds of surroundings the last time I checked."

On Friday, Los Angeles County accepted deeds for the land on behalf of the Santa Monica Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority, the state Parks and Recreation Department and the National Park Service.

"I have been dreaming of this day for more than 15 years," said Elizabeth Cheadle, the chairwoman of the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy. "We all are enormously grateful."

Since the 1970s, park agencies have pursued acquisition of the site that sits at the southeastern corner of Mulholland Highway and Las Virgenes Road. The site is home to an ancient village known as Talepop, once inhabited by Chumash Indians.

In the 1920s, razor magnate King C. Gillette bought the property and commissioned Wallace Neff, the "architect of California's golden age," to build his estate on it.

Since then, it had been owned by MGM director Clarence Brown and Bob and Dolores Hope. It was used as a filming location for scenes in "Gone With the Wind." It has been a seminary for the Claretian Order of the Catholic Church and the headquarters for The Church Universal and Triumphant. In 1986, it was purchased by Soka Gakkai/Nichren Shoshu of America, an Aliso Viejo-based liberal arts school.

Officials called this latest acquisition of parkland part of a "stitching together of open space" across the state, as officials have been working feverishly to preserve parkland for future generations.

The property was at the top of the wish list conservationists. So preservation agencies, public and private donors, and federal, state and local officials cobbled together the money to make it happen.

"This is just an extraordinary moment in history," said Ruth Coleman, the state parks director, which owns part of the site. "People in a hundred years from now are going to be able to come here and use this extraordinary natural resource and cultural resource."

Jason Kandel, (818) 713-3664 jason.kandel@dailynews.com

37 posted on 04/18/2005 8:01:15 AM PDT by SierraWasp (The "Heritage Oaks" in the Sierra-Nevada Conservancy are full of parasitic GovernMental mistletoe!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The Green idea is two faced. We have unlimited growth going on here. Sure we recycle, sure we clean dirty water at some facilities. But when you have 3 million people crowding into California in 3 years, and no end in sight, It is hypocritical to say you give a care about the environment.
38 posted on 04/18/2005 8:11:17 AM PDT by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: forester; SierraWasp
I attended a dinner/fund raiser for the Pacific Legal Foundation Saturday night with my son at the Ingomar Club (Carson Manson). We invited two local property rights activist and Don Amador of the Blue Ribbon Coalition to share our table. During the Q&A I asked about the Sierra Conservancy. He said it wasn't on their radar screen yet? I'm sure it will be soon enough...
39 posted on 04/18/2005 8:41:40 AM PDT by tubebender (We child proofed our house but they still get in...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DumpsterDiver

Thanks! I wish I could have heard him. And I wish SW could also hear one of McIntyre's rants. With his huge listening audience, more people may start to see the light.


40 posted on 04/18/2005 1:04:20 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson