Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My concers about the FAIR Tax

Posted on 04/17/2005 10:57:02 AM PDT by Somewhat Centrist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last
To: agitator

What are you talking about? Can you explain how your status as a non "paycheck taker" harms you with respect to the fair tax? Are you saying it is easier for you to evade taxes with an income tax? You realize you would get the same check as people who are paycheck takers, right?


41 posted on 04/17/2005 4:09:25 PM PDT by On the Road to Serfdom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

"You were a little unimformed on the rebate works, but you make several valid points. This tax is a major kick in the ass to self-employed people, and btw people on fixed incomes. And yes, income must still be reported for SS benefits and unemployment benefit purposes."

Ok, how informed do I have to be to know when I'm getting screwed? I still have to belong to a ponzi scheme called Social Security, I still have to carry around a Slave Surveillance Number like a cow, I still have somebody digging around in my bank account just because I choose not to work for somebody else, and I'm still getting the shaft by the socialists that prefer to use me and my "service" to get the IRS off *their* backs. Frankly, I don't have to know what part of a dead animal stinks the worst to know it still stinks.



42 posted on 04/17/2005 4:09:55 PM PDT by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: On the Road to Serfdom

Let's say I'm "self-employed" and I fix computers out of my garage once in a while. Right now I have the IRS up my ass like everybody else. I report the $100 I took in and pay tax on it when I file. After NRST, I STILL have IRS (or the state equivalent) up my ass only now I have my very own personal IRS agent. I don't have a retail store, I'm not a corporation, I don't even have a cash register (although I'll be required to get one - how do you think retail cash receipts get audited?)My incentive under NRST is to go get a paycheck job, not become a tax collector and have my own personal IRS agent. So much for small businesses that provide a "service." You wanna make tax collectors out of retail stores selling manufactured goods who are already collecting taxes in the cash registers they already own, fine. Leave me TF out of it. NRST does nothing for me except give me incentive to fold up my small business "service" and let my customers get hosed by some idiot at CompUSA.


43 posted on 04/17/2005 4:25:27 PM PDT by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: agitator
Anybody have any idea how easy it is to re-define something once it's in law? If I ocasionally sit down at somebody's computer, fix it, and take $100 in cash, that's a "service" isn't it?

Here's the killer. Their "sales tax" is "23% of the gross payment". It taxes taxes and anything else included in a "gross payment".

Using simple numbers, if you presently take $100.00 cash for a service and then pay 23% tax you'd have $77.00 after tax income.

After the sales tax if you take $100.00 cash, remit $23.00 you have $77.00 BEFORE tax income...you'd really only have $59.29 after tax income.

The only way you can have a service and maintain your income is to raise your price 30% (the amount of the tax).

$130.00 (gross payment) X .23 (gross payment tax)= $30.00 (rounded)

Before the sales tax the feds got $23.00 from your $100.00 service...after the sales tax the feds would get $53.00 from your $100.00 service....

To get your usual $77.00 after tax income you'd have to collect $130.00 not $100.00. The $30.00 you'd be required to collect from your customer plus the $23.00 they'd collect when you spent what's left.

44 posted on 04/17/2005 4:29:16 PM PDT by lewislynn (My other car is an XC90 T6 AWD....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

So, if I'm "self-employed" providing a "service" before NRST, I have an IRS headache, and AFTER NRST I STILL have an IRS headache. Meanwhile I have all of those paycheck people to thank who would rather turn me into a tax collector with my own personal IRS auditor so they can avoid filing. Sounds like a good deal to me. NOT. But hey, there's more paycheck people than the "self-employed" providing "services" so screw 'em. Yeah, that's not socialist.


45 posted on 04/17/2005 4:34:58 PM PDT by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

Hey, I can always go get a frontal lobotomy and get a paycheck job at CompUSA.


46 posted on 04/17/2005 4:37:59 PM PDT by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: agitator
Let's say I'm "self-employed" and I fix computers out of my garage once in a while. Right now I have the IRS up my ass like everybody else. I report the $100 I took in and pay tax on it when I file.

One benefit to the NRST is instead of waiting to file on a yearly basis, you will have submit monthly sales tax reports.

47 posted on 04/17/2005 4:53:37 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
One benefit to the NRST is instead of waiting to file on a yearly basis, you will have submit monthly sales tax reports.

Yea and it's simple. Just add up your gross income and send them 23% of it..the first year. Who knows after that?

48 posted on 04/17/2005 5:09:15 PM PDT by lewislynn (My other car is an XC90 T6 AWD....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: agitator
Ok, how informed do I have to be to know when I'm getting screwed? I still have to belong to a ponzi scheme called Social Security, I still have to carry around a Slave Surveillance Number like a cow, I still have somebody digging around in my bank account just because I choose not to work for somebody else, and I'm still getting the shaft by the socialists that prefer to use me and my "service" to get the IRS off *their* backs. Frankly, I don't have to know what part of a dead animal stinks the worst to know it still stinks.

Have you tried a laxative? I suggest a fast acting one.

49 posted on 04/17/2005 7:44:08 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: agitator
Hey, I can always go get a frontal lobotomy and get a paycheck job at CompUSA.

No comment...

50 posted on 04/17/2005 8:25:08 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: agitator
I don't want a check from the govt, I don't want anything from govt.

I agree. I might not register either. That's all there is to it. Don't register for the check and you won't get it.

51 posted on 04/17/2005 10:30:35 PM PDT by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: agitator

What ARE you talking about?

If you were previously NOT claiming your income from fixing computers, then you no wonder you think that you're right to be POed because now you will have to account for that income. Of course you could always choose to continue to cheat.

OTOH, if you are declaring this income and paying taxes then you really are confused.

If you charged the $100, after tax you are netting about $75 and then paying the imbedded tax on everything that you buy. That tax of (low balling it) 20% leaves you $60 after taxes.

Under the FairTax, if you charge the same $100 plus tax you remit the tax, keep the $100, and don't pay the imbedded on your purchases. Bottom line -- your are better off. If you lower your price because your tax costs are reduced, you are still no worse off.

I can't see what you're agitated about. Read to bill, get the facts, and then get on board. In the end, more people will have more computers and you'll have more computers to fix.


52 posted on 04/17/2005 10:41:06 PM PDT by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Badray; Mind-numbed Robot

KoolAid. That's the ticket. It will taste better with KoolAid, especially when Congress gets done with your beloved bill.


53 posted on 04/17/2005 11:05:09 PM PDT by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Badray
If you were previously NOT claiming your income from fixing computers, then you no wonder you think that you're right to be POed because now you will have to account for that income. Of course you could always choose to continue to cheat.

I think you have broken the code. But, as you say, if he is taking his chances now he can continue to do so. I don't know why one would make him feel more guilty, or threatened, than the other.

54 posted on 04/17/2005 11:10:20 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: oldenuff2no

BTTT


55 posted on 04/17/2005 11:16:28 PM PDT by streetpreacher (God DOES exist; He's just not into you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot

Dude, it's hypothetical. I don't fix computers or anything else for a living. I don't provide any "service" for a living. Considering what an academic exercise getting rid of the IRS is, I would have thought proponents of the idea would be a little more reasonable when it came to admitting defects in their proposal and try and refine it. I guess not.


56 posted on 04/17/2005 11:44:51 PM PDT by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: agitator
I would have thought proponents of the idea would be a little more reasonable when it came to admitting defects in their proposal and try and refine it.

Thanks for the explanation. Your refusal to consider the facts and the logic of the arguments presented, combined with your abrasive attitude, successfully hide your intentions.

If you truly wanted an explanation and a defense of the NRST you got plenty of it. Just look at it if you are interested.

57 posted on 04/17/2005 11:52:17 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Somewhat Centrist
you is ignored!

caught this haggis on Art bell smoked salmon from chicago commercial

58 posted on 04/17/2005 11:54:49 PM PDT by RIGHT IN LAS VEGAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Somewhat Centrist
Somewhat Centrist
59 posted on 04/17/2005 11:56:58 PM PDT by RIGHT IN LAS VEGAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agitator

The sponsors and co-sponsors will vote against the bill if it does not remain faithful to it's objective. Without that support, the bill will die and we stay where we are.

Put your fear aside and take a chance at reining in government. Put yourself back in charge of your tax bill.


60 posted on 04/18/2005 1:04:31 AM PDT by Badray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson