Posted on 04/07/2005 12:55:35 PM PDT by quidnunc
I think a cool idea is to have the gunner sit down inside the tank and operate the gun via a TV link, you'd have a much smaller unmanned turret. I like to play the role playing game Twilight: 2000" where you are in the 5th US Army Division in Poland after the year 2000 where you're fighting Soviets and Warsaw Pact even after the nukes fell in a limited nuclear war. It was called the "M1A2 Tank" aka "Giraffe" since it resembled a giraffe. The game was made in 1984 and I have the US Army Vehicle guide which was made in 1986 so it was made before the current M1A2 tank (I think in the game, it is an M1A3) came out. Wish I had my scanner hooked up, I'd scan in the Giraffe. There was also a depiction of an M60A4 in reactive armor too. In the game, World War III started with the Warsaw Pact in 1997 and it is still going on, so needless to say, it is alternate history. That picture of an M1 tank with a Gatling gun reminds me a little of the M691 "Diana" anti-aircraft gun on an M1 chassis which was another vehicle made for the game.
Thanks for the information, but does it make that much difference if the round exploded on the outer surface of a building or the interior? I can only imagine what one thousand 10 mm. balls can do for the stability of a building. I know what flechette (sp) rounds from an M-79 and a twelve gauge could do.
I would guess that in the end the shell of the building might remain but the enterior would be gutted.
L
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.