Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US wants to help India be a superpower!
Sify.com ^ | Saturday, 26 March , 2005, 09:58 AM | Sify.com

Posted on 03/25/2005 9:48:23 PM PST by CarrotAndStick

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: msf92497

Does that cover the cost of Chinese missiles(modified with help from leased Pakistani weapons) taking out American fighters???


21 posted on 03/25/2005 10:17:30 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

And China is earning its righful pennies, right?

PS: The Chinese economy is several times over propped by the US, in comparison to the Indian economy. If I've heard correct, outsourced wealth forms a miniscule fraction of India's economy.


22 posted on 03/25/2005 10:22:36 PM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Our manufacturing sector is already reserved for helping China be a superpower..

Thank the unions for this.
23 posted on 03/25/2005 10:25:47 PM PST by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Yeah Riiiight by selling F-16, PC3 Orions and CJ10s and PAC-3s to Pakistan!!
At this rate India will become a Superpower alright! /Sarcasm


24 posted on 03/25/2005 10:33:56 PM PST by Gengis Khan ("There is no glory in incomplete action." -- Gengis Khan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

US should be the only Super Power. Nothing should be threatening and come close to US in military means. Well, maybe India could be a sub-Super power to alert China. :)


25 posted on 03/25/2005 10:38:47 PM PST by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saberwielder

Is Bush good at geography? I mean he could be giving the F-16 to Pakistan thinking it to be India !


26 posted on 03/25/2005 10:45:05 PM PST by Gengis Khan ("There is no glory in incomplete action." -- Gengis Khan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

I can remember Mad Albright saying something about China and how they should be a superpower too. By the size of China's economy and our dependence on it, its clear to many people that the country has been artificially bolstered by the US government's policies.

Fewer people see it happening in India, but it is. Our government has brought the higher caste into this country and educated them and given them jobs here by the hundreds of thousand so they can learn and take back to India what they know about a "market economy".

Our government through USAID and I forgot to mention the UN, spent our money to bring India's infrastructure up-- that includes building power grids and power plants, water storage and distribution systems, roads, schools and hospitals. The United Nations and the WTO call it "capacity building" (they like to use euphemisms so the American people don't actually know where the money is going and why).

Then our government, through many different trade agreements and the creation of government programs like the Export Import Bank, the INF and OPIC, guaranteed that US businesses would locate offshore in India.

Its been a great scam-- it has worked well for India.

The next step is to do the same thing in the Western Hemisphere, more US tax money disappearing to build the economies of other nations to compete against us. This is called, in our hemisphere, the Free Trade of the Americas Agreement (FTAA). Its purpose is not only to raise the standard of living in "poor countries" in the hemipshere (which is lowering ours BTW)but to integrate all the countries in the hemisphere into one very large trading bloc, to compete with competition we created for ourselves in Asia. The problem with this, is that the United States loses its sovereignty and the US Constitution merely becomes an historic curiousity.


27 posted on 03/25/2005 10:46:00 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Wiz

India, China are too large to stop. Unless America decides to nuke both of these countries to oblivion, hoping they don't retaliate, there is no way of stopping them from steaming ahead.


28 posted on 03/25/2005 10:47:24 PM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Indians of all diversity, arrive American shores. Not just the 'higher castes'.


29 posted on 03/25/2005 10:49:39 PM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Simple. India is a good democracy, friendly to Anglophones. We wish them very well. China will not get the goodies until it becomes free and unthreatening.


30 posted on 03/25/2005 10:50:38 PM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Are you from India?


31 posted on 03/25/2005 11:03:09 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

India has a great potential, not just in terms of population, but the skills such as mathematics and English, which may also allow advantages in software and science, also useful for military products. Probably India will also have the ability to be one of the major exporting countries of military products. I just hope India will not be an enemy of the US.


32 posted on 03/25/2005 11:05:29 PM PST by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Sorry, took a breather.

Which Chinese missiles?

I thought we were moving toward F/A-22 for domestic use.

If the Chinese missiles are a threat to the fleet we are currently marketing, then it seems we have an opportunity to sell some costly upgrades/enhancements in the near future.


33 posted on 03/25/2005 11:15:16 PM PST by msf92497 (nothing yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Yes.


34 posted on 03/25/2005 11:15:59 PM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Wiz

Rest assured, they won't. Unless America has its strategy confused.


35 posted on 03/25/2005 11:17:12 PM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: msf92497

The Chinese are getting to work on their on active radar BVRAAMs like the SD-10 & shorter range weapons like the PL-11 & 12.Those weapons have Russian help & would gain a lot from an infusion of American tech from systems like the AMRAAM or Aim-9X,which may end up being sold to Pakistan.& given Pakistan's longlasting friendship with China,they wouldn't mind tossing a few missiles to Beijing.

About the F/A-22,the numbers being ordered are very small(about 200 as of now)-there is no guarantee that there will be enough of them to provide complete superiority against China.

Lastly,sensible nations don't sell weaponry to troublemakers or potential troublemakers & then design systems to defeat the earlier ones.


36 posted on 03/25/2005 11:20:47 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: sukhoi-30mki

Thanks.

I agree about the transfer of sensitive tech to questionable partners. Not a good idea, unless the tech is poisoned, or has a trojan.

We are not living under the B(J)enign rule of Bubba. I doubt any unacceptable tech transfers will occur.

There's a new Sheriff in town.

Chin up!


38 posted on 03/25/2005 11:29:47 PM PST by msf92497 (nothing yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: msf92497

Bubba did a lot of things,but selling F-16s to Pakistan was not one of them.About the new sherrif in Town,has he stopped armssales to Arab/muslim nations???


39 posted on 03/25/2005 11:32:24 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Well, well, well the journalist who wrote this piece doesnt quite 'get it' as evidenced by "worlds oldest and largest democracies" ;-) lol but that source's remark is VERY interesting and perhaps significant...hmmmmmmmmmm...

It's VERY good to see SOMEONE [gee I wonder WHO? ;-)] in the U.S. Govt DOES seem to 'get it' ;-) ;-) eh? - imho it's none too soon to begin long range geostrategic contingency-planning for AFTER this 'New American Century'.

With statements like these my Hope is bolstered that Western Civilization may win again in the coming REAL 'Clash of Civilizations' afterall :-))).


40 posted on 03/25/2005 11:33:42 PM PST by FYREDEUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson