Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Celebs draw line in sand over public beach access in Malibu
San Luis Obispo Tribune ^ | March 18, 2005 | ANGIE WAGNER

Posted on 03/21/2005 10:53:59 AM PST by tomball

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: RKV
I don't know how these celebrities property deeds read but ours is spelled out exactly what is our and that it has been deemed private property by the county Getting people to respect "private property" & "no trespassing" signs is another matter
41 posted on 03/21/2005 11:35:55 AM PST by boxerblues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Count me in Doug. Wet sand is all public.


42 posted on 03/21/2005 11:37:25 AM PST by AGreatPer (Harley, an American Tradition. Clinton, an American Disgrace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues
If you read the article in detail, its clear that there are public trails to the beach (and some other apparently poorly marked easements) - so people can legally be there. I live in Santa Barbara and have driven past this area for a number of years on business. We have similar problems here. The beach is getting much more use than in the past and that is a fact. It is also pretty clear that some folks are abusing private property. Its a mixed bag. I do admit to a chuckle when the limousine liberals show their true colors.
43 posted on 03/21/2005 11:41:08 AM PST by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues

In Sea Island, GA, there are no public beaches . There are public accesses to the beaches for the people who live or rent the cottages inland. The people who use these accesses are mindful of the private properties, but can set up tents and even have dinner parties on the beaches.

It's a matter of respect - both ways.


44 posted on 03/21/2005 11:41:34 AM PST by peacebaby (I'll get to Heaven, but I'll be on probation for a while.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tomball

Reminds me of that windmill problem in Martha's Vinwyard. Never in a liberal's backyard.


45 posted on 03/21/2005 11:46:07 AM PST by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomball

Nothing like sunbathing on wet sand.


46 posted on 03/21/2005 11:46:36 AM PST by Old Professer (As darkness is the absence of light, evil is the absence of good; innocence is blind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomball

The liberal lawmakers of Malibu should sponsor a program for the Homeless and the rehabilitated criminals to make use of the public facilities of Malibu. I'm sure all the caring libs who own the beach properties would be happy to share.


47 posted on 03/21/2005 11:50:02 AM PST by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomball
If they have to stay in the wet sand then I guess they won't be laying in the sun. If the beach is public then it shouldn't matter whose home is further back, the sandy beach is still PUBLIC.

The Hollywood elite like to claim that they champion the little guy, but in reality they want the little guy as far away from them as possible.

I suspect they don't buy it because that would prove it. Some of these celebs even dislike or hate having fans. They don't like being recognized. Makes one wonder what they thought being a celebrity would be all about, when they strove to be one.

48 posted on 03/21/2005 11:54:54 AM PST by Netizen (jmo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Military family member

I live in Santa Monica & have been down on these Malibu beaches. Although, most of the time I was an invited guest...I did once crash a 4th of July party at Robert Redfords home. That was priceless.....and a ton of fun.


49 posted on 03/21/2005 12:07:25 PM PST by Feiny (Too bad drinking scotch isn't a paying job or Kenny's dad would be a millionaire!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

"The Hollywood elite like to claim that they champion the little guy, but in reality they want the little guy as far away ...."

very good point.


50 posted on 03/21/2005 12:08:26 PM PST by peacebaby (I'll get to Heaven, but I'll be on probation for a while.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

The ad says, "fresh water flying only", so that wouldn't solve this problem.


51 posted on 03/21/2005 12:20:55 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
It is complicated all over the country. In MD, the tidal land is public. That is because it is Federal (I believe) Determining the mean sea level and riparian rights s a complicated problem all over the country.
52 posted on 03/21/2005 1:03:11 PM PST by Citizen Tom Paine (An old sailor sends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tomball
"They treat this like a huge garbage dump," said Ron Lawrence, a retired doctor out for a morning walk along Broad Beach. "I've seen people defecate on the beaches. They wouldn't tolerate it in the city."

This guy's never been to San Francisco.

53 posted on 03/21/2005 1:08:56 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle

My thoughts exactly. The old `I have an armed bodyguard, but no guns for you'/jet to the Save the Polar Bears lib-limo syndrome. Absolutely shameless parasites.
(Here's the deal: they can have the beaches. And their `culture'. We'll keep everything in the middle, including the food.)


54 posted on 03/21/2005 1:12:16 PM PST by OkieDoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: tomball

-"I've seen people defecate on the beaches. They wouldn't tolerate it in the city."-

Sure they do. Liberal cities everywhere give free reign to public bums.


55 posted on 03/21/2005 1:14:50 PM PST by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: feinswinesuksass

My wife and I lived in the colony for a short time. The only person that we saw using the beach was tom hanks. He was nice. Other neighbors sting etc never used the beach. Brian Keith just sat in a lawn chair in his garage all day, no wonder he shot himself. Most of these people are so self absorbed and they really do not have much of a life so they make gigantic deals out of nothing. Generally pathetically little lives that are based on others for their validity. Er go buying a beach house and trying to make it your own beach. which is property they did not buy because in california you cant.


56 posted on 03/21/2005 1:19:29 PM PST by Walkingfeather (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
Here's some creative progressives:
New Times L.A. Apr 11, 2002

Even now, in what might be described as a battle of the haves and the have mores, lawsuits are flying after a remarkable piece of beach-money politics involving a trio of Malibu heavyweights: billionaire philanthropist Eli Broad, billionaire television mogul Haim Saban (Mighty Morphin Power Rangers) and Nancy Daly Riordan, wife of the ex-Los Angeles mayor [Richard Riordan] and failed gubernatorial candidate. In exchange for being allowed to build huge mansions near each other on Carbon Beach that would illegally obstruct ocean views, the three friends overcame the commission’s objections by the most old-fashioned of means. They wrote checks for a combined $1 million to buy and donate a strip of shoreline 80 feet wide for public access -- not near their homes, but at nearby La Costa Beach.

The “gift” would provide the only access point in one of the most inaccessible of Malibu’s residential beach corridors. But La Costa homeowners -- among them actor Ryan O’Neal and record producer Lou Adler -- weren’t keen on having the public hordes invade the empty beachfront just off their balconies. They’ve sued the coastal commission and its sister agency, the state Coastal Conservancy, to prevent the site, known locally as “the cove,” from getting opened to the public. Agreeing with them, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge last July scolded Broad, Daly Riordan and Saban for maneuvering to transfer a “nuisance” to their neighbors down the beach. The commission has appealed the ruling. But regardless of whether the “the cove” is ever opened, Broad, Daly Riordan and Saban can’t lose. At a cost of a million dollars divided by three, they got approval for the houses they wanted, leaving the La Costa folks to duke it out with the state in court.


57 posted on 03/21/2005 1:22:30 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rockabyebaby
Hmmm, why don't these celebs just buy the beach outright, they have enough money, end of story,

Uh. No. There are regulations that prevent it.

58 posted on 03/21/2005 1:22:46 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tomball
And so the downward spiral of FR continues. In the state of California it is legal to own private property down to the mean high-tide. That means cities like Hermosa Beach and Huntington Beach legally own their beachs all the way down to the mean high-tide line. (LA county controls most of the other beaches in front of beach towns such as Manhattan Beach.)

It also means individuals have the right to own property down to the mean high-tide line. Broadbeach creates problems because it is a continuation of LA County's Zuma Beach. At the first private property line, the entire public beach is narrowed down to the wet sand in the mean high tide zone.

Where Broadbeach gets confusing is that certain homeowners have allowed public easements up past the wet sand onto their private property ie dry sand. That's what creates the checker board look.

However, regardless of one's wealth or political affiliation, the bottom line is that this is a private property issue.

59 posted on 03/21/2005 1:26:45 PM PST by lemura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
Never bothered us much, but then again, we weren't rich arrogant farts either.

You, alas, were done in by the embarrassment of having sh*t that stinks...

60 posted on 03/21/2005 1:27:58 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson