A New Partnership for North America
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: HiJinx; Dat Mon
Its an older article, but it is pertinent given the trilateral meeting next week in Texas to discuss NAFTA-plus
To: hedgetrimmer; Squantos; TexasCowboy; Dog Gone
Let's get it over with and annex Mexico, be cheaper in the long run.
3 posted on
03/18/2005 5:57:47 PM PST by
razorback-bert
(FR's spell checker thinks Freepers isn't a word)
To: hedgetrimmer
After the Mexicans pay us for the services rendered by our country to their illegals.
5 posted on
03/18/2005 6:00:50 PM PST by
TruthConquers
(Delenda est publius schola)
To: hedgetrimmer
. Castaneda said it includes a more continental approach to social issues, immigration and energy. Does this mean continent wide recognition of "gay marriage"? The idea of a "continental approach to social issues" means a lot of people will be unhappy, because leftist ideas will be imposed everywhere.
6 posted on
03/18/2005 6:02:44 PM PST by
Paleo Conservative
(I Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: hedgetrimmer
Sure...push the U.S. border south...... and let good old Vinny....run for governor.
8 posted on
03/18/2005 6:05:26 PM PST by
pointsal
To: hedgetrimmer
If Mexico wants a unified continent, they should fire their President, disband their Parliament, and apply for statehood. Short of that, I don't wanna hear their whining.
To: hedgetrimmer
continental integration
No thanks - take your idea of socialist paradise somewhere else please.
11 posted on
03/18/2005 6:08:39 PM PST by
association330
("They say the world has become too complex for simple answers - they are wrong.")
To: hedgetrimmer
"We would like to move more quickly. We would like to move more deeply."
Come any closer and I'll show you my Second Amendment!
15 posted on
03/18/2005 6:13:14 PM PST by
Max in Utah
(By their works you shall know them.)
To: hedgetrimmer
I wonder if Fox feels the same about his southern border??
To: hedgetrimmer
Why isn't Mexico clamoring for closer 'integration' with Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Panama, etc. to their immediate south, countries with which they have far closer cultural and linguistic ties???
Obvious answer: Mexican politicians hunger for more dollars, and want to leech off our economy more than ever.
20 posted on
03/18/2005 6:29:18 PM PST by
Enchante
(Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
To: hedgetrimmer
The anti Christ's new world order plan
ten nation world wide confederacy
Canada the USA and Mexico one big happy family
With allegiance to the anti Christ...
All it takes is the Judas Goat to lead us there...
imo
22 posted on
03/18/2005 7:01:05 PM PST by
joesnuffy
(The generation that survived the depression and won WW2 proved poverty does not cause crime)
To: hedgetrimmer
No doubt the corrupt of Mexico would like to extend their web into the US. Addicting drugs and illegal labor are the first wave, and the next will be acquisition of political power and business interests.
To: hedgetrimmer; Howlin; Timesink; Utah Girl; hosepipe; backhoe; FITZ; Happy2BMe; ...
A New Partnership for North America
Sure why not we've already got a good start on murdering judges and liberals lawyer scum defenders Why not just go all the way socialist ?
Then we can let the communist thugs from Venezuela climb on up through the continent and swarm us from below while in the meantime Russia can attack the US from above china will more than likely enjoy the beaches and resorts on the east coast while the Mexicans finish corrupting the west coast along with the Russians who will be relaxing on the beaches while any remnant of freedom in America just goes down the crapper
[No room for sarcasm]
25 posted on
03/18/2005 7:22:53 PM PST by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(What are we as a country without our God Our law or our Constitution FREEDOM pales without all 3)
To: hedgetrimmer
One question we should be asking Mexico is why they want to annex the countries north of their border instead of south.
Could it be that those counties are dirt poor and they would drive down every standard of living in Mexico to the lowest common denominator?
That's exactly what would happen to the US if we united with Mexico.
The riches we made and earned would be sucked into the vacuum of Mexico.
Ross was right.
27 posted on
03/18/2005 7:35:34 PM PST by
twas
To: hedgetrimmer
Mexico pushes for continental integration I wonder if they are just looking for welfare money?
28 posted on
03/18/2005 7:44:00 PM PST by
Mark17
To: hedgetrimmer
"Mexico wants its North American neighbours to move more quickly towards integration on a continental scale..."
When we decide to renew America's Manifest Destiny, it will be on OUR terms, Mr. Castaneda. When it happens it will be because of turds like you and your governing elite.......but nice of you to invite us over.
To: hedgetrimmer
Right. If you won't fix your country, just spread the joy.
Free Mexico.
31 posted on
03/18/2005 8:33:54 PM PST by
PoorMuttly
("Out of the Bat-Cave and through the woods, to PoorMuttly's house we go"-Shakespeare, me pretty sure)
To: hedgetrimmer
"We would like to continentalize as much as possible," he said. They can start by making it legal for me to carry my .357 into Mexico!
32 posted on
03/18/2005 8:45:44 PM PST by
c-b 1
To: hedgetrimmer
Mexican Foreign Affairs Secretary Jorge Castaneda was in Ottawa on Friday, meeting for the first time with Minister of Foreign Affairs Bill Graham. "We would like to continentalize as much as possible," he said.
Yep. And I would like the little grinning commie mexicans to SHUT UP as much as possible. Doesn't look like I'm gonna get what I want either.
34 posted on
03/18/2005 9:36:31 PM PST by
TLI
( . . . ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA . . . . . .)
To: hedgetrimmer
40 posted on
03/18/2005 10:45:42 PM PST by
shellshocked
(They're undocumented Border Patrol agents, not vigilantes.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson