Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NOTHING HERE FOR HILL TO FEAR (Hillary will win in 2006)
NY Post ^ | 3/17/05 | Eric Fetterman

Posted on 03/17/2005 7:39:46 AM PST by areafiftyone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: areafiftyone; Mr. K
I'm confused. Why don't we want her to get chuffed on a Senate win and run for President in 2008?

Her makeover may have succeeded within the rest of New York, but trust me, the rest of the country hasn't changed its opinion of her and won't by 2008.
21 posted on 03/17/2005 7:54:05 AM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Who has national recognition and would move here to run?

Alan Keyes?
22 posted on 03/17/2005 7:54:50 AM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Piquaboy

***Her legs look like beer kegs and believe me, I know what a beer keg looks like.***

Yes, but the sight of a beer keg makes my mouth water, not vomit.


23 posted on 03/17/2005 7:56:20 AM PST by Zeppelin (Keep on FReepin' on.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Plus, no New York Democrat has ever been defeated for re-election to the U.S. Senate since direct elections for the office began in 1913.

And we all know historical trends guarantee future results. For instance, no sitting president's political party has ever strengthened their foothold in Congress during his midterm elections...oh, wait, that happened in 2002. Well then, how about if the Washington Redskins lose their last home game before a presidential election the incumbent will be defeated...oops, 2004 shot that one down, too.

Gee. Maybe relying on past occurrences as a political strategy isn't as bulletproof as it appeared. I guess we should rethink foregoing elections and actually give the people the opportunity to make their own choices rather than bowing to the supreme infallibility of the Democrat Psychic Network.

24 posted on 03/17/2005 7:57:20 AM PST by Antonello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
This is a great example of how different things would be if the old-timey media treated dems and Republicans alike. If Hillie runs in 2006 and is elected, she can do anything shes wants for 2008 no matter how many times she said she "Serve the full term in the Senate." Should Condi decide to run in 2008, the same crapweasel media will characterize her as having lied about her intentions.

My view is that Hillie WILL NOT run for Senate in 2006 but will use Willie's status and her one term to steal the nomination. Why would she have to run while holding an elective office once she has established that she has the capability of performing the duties of such a position? The media will give all the platform she requires. No, Hillie will not run for reelection in 2006!

25 posted on 03/17/2005 7:58:35 AM PST by Tacis ("John ("What SF-180?") Kerry - Still Shilling For Those Who Would Harm America!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Staying in the Senate has helped Hillary politically

Hillary promised to serve her full 6 year term when she ran for the Senate. Her 1st term isn't "Staying in the Senate" it is fulfilling a commitment she can't run out on. "Staying in the Senate" is running for a second term. I for 1 think it is not necessarily a given she will run again. I'm waiting for her to say "I'm running".

26 posted on 03/17/2005 8:00:57 AM PST by hflynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Try to get a hold of yourself! She has absolutely NO CHANCE of winning in 2008. She will beaten in much the same fashion as Kerry attempted to beat W. In an "anybody but Hillary" race. Even if Condi decided to nuzzle up next to abortion rights, Hillary frightens the pants off of every Republican, Libertarian and left leaning Republican in this country. The numbers for voter turn out will break the 2004 record and Hillary will be beaten soundly!! Mostly by, once again, middle America!!


27 posted on 03/17/2005 8:05:23 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory
Her makeover may have succeeded within the rest of New York, but trust me, the rest of the country hasn't changed its opinion of her and won't by 2008.

Don't underestimate the female voters. She is very popular among women voters! She also will get the Black and Hispanic vote! We have to beat her before she gets that far. BUT, trying to beat her for the NY Senate seat is like beating a dead horse. I just won't happen. So we have to wait until she announces her run for president which will come soon after she wins her Senate seat. And the hard part is we cannot bring up any of the stuff that happened while she was in the White House otherwise we will lose BIG TIME!! The American public does not want to re-hash the whole thing over and will only think that Republicans can't GET OVER IT!

28 posted on 03/17/2005 8:06:09 AM PST by areafiftyone (The Democrat's Mind: The Hamster's dead but the wheel's still spinning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: albie

Who will beat Hillary in 2008??? We don't have anyone who can beat her at this point!


29 posted on 03/17/2005 8:07:36 AM PST by areafiftyone (The Democrat's Mind: The Hamster's dead but the wheel's still spinning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: zarf

"Any fat female politicians should be stripped of their franchise..." Dumb comments like this win votes for Hillary and reinforce stereotypes about the Neanderthal right. Save it for the barroom. Otherwise, if she gets elected, I'll blame you.


30 posted on 03/17/2005 8:09:10 AM PST by joylyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tacis

I think she will run for Senate. This way she will keep her Senate seat while running for president like Kerry and Lieberman did. That way if she loses her bid for the presidency she still has a job with political power! Remember she is power hungry!


31 posted on 03/17/2005 8:09:51 AM PST by areafiftyone (The Democrat's Mind: The Hamster's dead but the wheel's still spinning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Who will beat Hillary in 2008???

Hillary will beat herself. Liberalism and Liberislam, Hillary has both problems, can't win in 2008.

32 posted on 03/17/2005 8:11:17 AM PST by hflynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

The black vote is going to the right at break-neck speed! Republicans are wooing the black vote thru the pastors and churches that many rely on for guidance. Blacks are beginning to see what the Dems have done for them over the past decades...zero, zip! When Condi decides to run, which she will because it will be by the request of W, the media can do all they want to depict her as the female Uncle Tom, which they will. Now that black voters are beginning to see who really brings them into the political fold, W, the MSM BS will no longer work. The MSM is dying a slow painful death. Talk radio, Fox (to some degree) and the blogosphere will defeat the Dems in 2008. Of course, they're doing a pretty good job at political suicide themselves.


33 posted on 03/17/2005 8:16:09 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

In my experience, liberal women like her, but a LOT of moderate women despise her. She comes across as fake and a lot of women don't respect her for the way she stood by Bill when he cheated on her. Never underestimate the ability of an ambitious woman to make other women hate her.


34 posted on 03/17/2005 8:16:46 AM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

calm down. there's no way hrc will win the white house, read sabato's critique of all these "sky is falling" conservatives.....She has you spooked royally.


35 posted on 03/17/2005 8:17:09 AM PST by watsonfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

The republicans would have to pick a real loser for Hillary to win. She's just too much of a disgusting, self serving pig.


36 posted on 03/17/2005 8:19:02 AM PST by lotusblos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evets

"She has nice legs"

Correction, she had nice legs when black and white photography was main stream.


37 posted on 03/17/2005 8:21:10 AM PST by lotusblos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

"Who has national recognition and would move here to run?"

Arnold!


38 posted on 03/17/2005 8:22:59 AM PST by lotusblos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lotusblos

Actually, black and white, color, trick photography, smoke, mirrors, none of these can erase or cover the evil bitch that is Hillary. Bitches are a turn-on for some guys. This...thing, has snakes ready to burst from her eye sockets.


39 posted on 03/17/2005 8:24:29 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: albie

"This...thing, has snakes ready to burst from her eye sockets."

And elsewhere I'm sure.


40 posted on 03/17/2005 8:26:07 AM PST by lotusblos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson