Posted on 03/16/2005 2:23:21 PM PST by neverdem
RINO'S ALL! VOTE 'em OUT!
...wishing for a policy which states "if your state does not support independent energy exploration, then your state gets NO external energy sources".
Anybody have any idea how long before they put forth the bill to actually open the ANWAR for drilling? What is the next step?
Actually, drilling that area will make it off-limits to any other development, thereby protecting it.
Nothing has been lost from the Alaska pipieline coming out of Prudhoe and Barrow. Only gained. These people who oppose it are
Your post left me hanging.
"For drilling to take place, the Senate will later have to pass a measure explicitly authorizing the opening of the wildlife refuge to drilling, something that until now has been prohibited. Then the House of Representatives would have to explicitly authorize drilling as well."
The authorization could be filibustered.
In NYT parlance, a RINO is "moderate," but a moderate Liberal is "Conservative."
Oh my, and I had such high hopes for Coleman. I am so disillusioned.
I heard that the area in question was always designated for reserves. Wish I knew the truth. But, as a geologist, DRILL. It won't hurt even if there were a spill. I love the arrogance of enviros who think that our very existence is a blight on the planet. FEH!
No, unless the dims want to filibuster the budget. Even they are not THAT dumb.
IIRC, they can't filibuster budget bills. That's why this was added to the budget bill. The way that the story is written, I have the impression that the vote for authorization will come later.
Basically a $5 billion tax before they add the local/state/federal per gallon tax after production. Next time anyone gets upset about the price of gas, don't point fingers at Exxon or Chevron, look at government greed.
I'm not defending the seven RINOs. But ordinarily RINOs can make a deal with the majority leader to vote against a bill (and please their constituents) just as long as the bill passes. Their votes are only needed at critical moments.
Voting down a bill is another matter, of course. Unfortunately, only the senate leadership knows whether a particular RINO was authorized to vote against a bill.
While it's annoying, it makes a certain sense. You can give a RINO some lattitude as long as they vote the right way on critical issues. Of course that's talking about states where only RINOs can get elected.
It's a fill-in-the-blank sentence.
It's not an extra tax. It's an assumption that existing taxes will add up to $5 billion by the time the reserves are used up. They put that in as an excuse for including it in the budget bill, where it couldn't be filibustered.
OK, thanks for the correction. It makes me feel much better that we will only be giving the government a mere 5 billion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.