Posted on 03/08/2005 8:01:12 AM PST by Pendragon_6
Cool. Now we tack on an amendment to the same bill to protect HETEROsexual babies too, and the battle is over.
"..."gene" means genetic, homosexuality by is own cannot reproduce therefore, it cannot be genetic - therefore, you cannot be born gay.
Means there are no genes that make you that way becuase they cannot reproduce....."
Ah, but what of spontaneous mutation? If there is a so-called gay gene, you cannot dismiss the possibility that it is a spontaneously occuring mutation.....which could occur randomly in the population, without regard to heritability from the parents.
Kind of. The intent is not a serioius law, but to put liberals in an awkward position of having to choose between pro-abortion or pro-gay.
If there is a "gay gene" it might well be recessive. So, straight people could be carriers of the gene without being gay themselves. So, even if gay people didn't reproduce, the "gay gene" would carry on.
It is an elegant strategy.
Meanwhile, abortion of normal, healthy babies can continue unabated.
I think by "gay, unborn children" They are referring to any unborn inside a homosexual man, injected there by another homosexual man or in a lesbians womb, injected by another lesbian.
Poor gays- being discriminated against again-Heterosexuals may abort but they may not.
Blatent homosapienphobia.
Oh this is rich. A gay gene that tells if the kid is gay. So if the kid is born and he is not gay, this should make his life so much fun.
"Billy, why aren`t you interested in Barbie dolls and Judy Garland?"
"I hate that stuff! I wanna play football! Waah!"
They hold the umbilical cord with their little fingers raised.
What about the liberal gene, have they isolated that yet? It`s a gene that causes a person to have the utmost love and facination with everything that defies logic. "President Clinton rapes women? Oh elect him to another term!" "Marion Barry smokes crack? Oh elect him to another term!" "Ted Kennedy got drunk and let a woman drown in a car? Elect him to another term over and over and over."
Oh, MAN! Please tell me this doesn't apply to the gay baby whales. I just authorized a tactical nuclear strike and I think I left the recall codes in my other uniform.
Unbelievable.
These people are nuts. Unbelievable. I thought I'd heard everything. When I first saw the title, I thought it was a joke. A baby is a baby, a gift from God.
We really need to test our water supplies for hallucinogens.
For or against? Why does the details surrounding the conception have bearing on the right to life of the child in the womb? If one believes that the child in the womb has a right to life I don't see rape as a factor that changes that right. The child didn't rape the woman.
Wouldn't that law be discriminatory?
Suddenly, her body is not her's and her's alone, after all. Okay to abort the child for any number of serious to superficial reasons, but denying the ranks of homosexuals another member will now become illegal.
Sickening.
Sigh.
Again, virtually everyone MISSES THE POINT of the legislation.
If all babies were proven to have the gay gene, recessive or not, would abortion still be legal?/semi sarcastic
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.