Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator to Propose Raising Retirement Age
AP ^ | 3-7-2005 | NEDRA PICKLER

Posted on 03/07/2005 9:24:05 AM PST by Cagey

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-212 next last

1 posted on 03/07/2005 9:24:05 AM PST by Cagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cagey

That is the only thing I am completely against is raising the retirement age. What about people who do hard, manual labor? Something Congresspeople would not understand.

I plan on emailing my Senators concerning this matter.


2 posted on 03/07/2005 9:29:19 AM PST by yellowdoghunter (Liberals should be seen and not heard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yellowdoghunter

I agree. I don't want to retire any later than I have to. I don't want to have to drag my butt to work at 70 years old! I think it should be optional. I want to enjoy my retirement and not be too old for it!


3 posted on 03/07/2005 9:32:07 AM PST by areafiftyone (The Democrat's Mind: The Hamster's dead but the wheel's still spinning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cagey

raise it to 70 and repeal the income cap...count every vote and tax every dollar...lol


4 posted on 03/07/2005 9:37:00 AM PST by freddiedavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yellowdoghunter

So let's see here, the government says that the retirement age is 65 when you start working (and contributing) then gets to unilaterally change the deal? Hmmm.


5 posted on 03/07/2005 9:40:58 AM PST by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cagey

Orwell nailed it in Animal Farm.


6 posted on 03/07/2005 9:40:59 AM PST by deepFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Chuck Hagel, do me a favor and don't worry about me, ok?
How 'bout you and your partners-in-slime just keep your dirty hands off of MY money?!
It's laughable that the United States Congress actually think they're more able to look after my retirement than I am. Those spineless jellyfish can't balance their own budget, and I'm supposed to trust them with mine?
7 posted on 03/07/2005 9:45:37 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cagey; All

Does anyone know the potential availability of the private funds? Would they be available any time I deemed I was ready to retire or would I have to wait until this arbitrarily set government retirement age?

I know, no plan exists yet, but I have not seen this element discussed and curiousity is killing me!


8 posted on 03/07/2005 9:49:48 AM PST by CSM (Currently accepting applications for the position of stay at home mom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cagey

OK, so lets come out and say it, shall we?

A MASSIVE CUT IN BENEFITS to current workers. And to add insult to injury, no personal ownership of benefits, just the assurance that they will keep raising the age limit so that I will never collect a benefit. This is insane, unjust and unfair to those of us who are contributing currently.

Now I will have to work harder and longer to pay for old people to enjoy benefits that I may never see myself. Workers everywhere should be outraged by this robbery. We need our own AARP to lobby these bozos.


9 posted on 03/07/2005 9:51:08 AM PST by Wiseghy (Go Gov. Arnie!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
Bartlett indicated the president may consider raising the amount of income that is taxed to fund Social Security above the current $90,000 per person.

When did it go up that high? I thought it was $67,000 about 6-7 years ago. They are already pusing that limit up much faster than inflation how it is.

10 posted on 03/07/2005 9:52:56 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cagey

If the politicians had kept their hands off Social Security, and not widened the rules as to who could collect so that the collectors would be beholden to the politicians at election time, the program wouldn't be in dire straits.


11 posted on 03/07/2005 9:55:41 AM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CSM
I'm sure your private account would be treated like your 401K and you couldn't touch it without tax consequences until retirement. And I'm sure there would be mandated withdrawals also.

You know, it occurs to me that if folks here, one of the nation's most conservative, self-reliant collections of news junkies, can't be depended on to consider extending the retirement age one freaking year, then Social Security reform is doomed.

If you can't do manual labor at 68, go work at Wal-Mart for a year or two. It won't kill you. Or sit on your butt on your own savings.

For the life of me I can't figure out why my generation is going to be the only one to make any sacrifice at all. You decrepit old codgers are going to knock down any reform that might call for you to give up anything. My generation most likely won't even get our money back and you greedy old farts won't chip in a dime. Shame on you.

12 posted on 03/07/2005 9:58:48 AM PST by big gray tabby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wiseghy

Unfortunately, the only way any kind of reform will make it out of Congress is if it is not completely what we would want. But, the question is, how many bones will be tossed to the Dems.

We simply can't pass a bill without at least some Dems voting for it.


13 posted on 03/07/2005 9:59:39 AM PST by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: big gray tabby

I am 21, and by the time I retire, the retirement age will probably be 75-80 or something. Hell, I may die before being able to retire.


14 posted on 03/07/2005 10:00:51 AM PST by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

That is what they are counting on.


15 posted on 03/07/2005 10:04:37 AM PST by PogySailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: big gray tabby

Is the retirement age strictly defined by the SS benefit eligibility age? Would my 401K not be accessible until I reach the arbitrary age set by the gov't?

I know, I should know the answers to these questions, but I don't.....If the two are tied, then I definitely need to reconsider my investment strategy!


16 posted on 03/07/2005 10:04:54 AM PST by CSM (Currently accepting applications for the position of stay at home mom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: big gray tabby

You are right. I am 32 and am totally against them raising the retirement age. They have already raised it. Have some compassion for those who do hard, manual labor...I am assuming you do not.

The rest of the options I am willing to listen to and see where they lead us.


17 posted on 03/07/2005 10:05:46 AM PST by yellowdoghunter (Liberals should be seen and not heard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

Raising the retirement age would greatly ease the SS burden, but according to some statistics, help some who tend to die off within 2 years of retirement...My dad is 75, and he is working Pizza Delivery and has for the past 7 years after 40 years of owning his own service station/automotive repair business. He is for raising the limit also!


18 posted on 03/07/2005 10:08:45 AM PST by princess leah (\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
I am 21, and by the time I retire, the retirement age will probably be 75-80 or something. Hell, I may die before being able to retire.

When Social Security was started with retirement age of 65, most people died by the time they were 62.

19 posted on 03/07/2005 10:10:02 AM PST by DrDavid (Support Global Warming: Surf the Hebrides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yellowdoghunter
Screw congress. Soon we will need to look like this before we can collect social security:


20 posted on 03/07/2005 10:13:27 AM PST by Donna Lee Nardo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-212 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson