Posted on 03/04/2005 9:42:33 AM PST by TWohlford
No, I think it is perfect for this discussion. Can we get one of those Liberal HOTEL ALPHAS in a room and film it while you explain it to them?
"If you separate illegal immigrants who cannot speak or write English....."
Maybe we should put this article on big posters every 1000' along our borders so they'll decide not to enter such a worthless country.
This guy has #2 for brains.
Yeah, we are so poverty stricken in this country that our poor have a car, have at least one TV, and usually a cable hookup, running water and electricity, and multiple sets of clothes.
Gee, if we compare our poor with China's middle class, you think we would see any difference ? Fact of the matter is, poor is relative to the country you live in. We actually have very few who truly qualify as poor, unable to clothe, house or feed themselves.
If you drive by housing projects or very poor neighborhoods in cities, what's the common charactistic of many of the supposed poor ? Obesity. I ask you, if we have so many prople going hungry, why are they mainly so fat ?
Garbage article.
/rant
Apparently...none of those things are important enough to make other countries #1. So, what's the point? That we're somehow "graced"? Now THAT'd make lefties heads explode!
Most countries that mean anything in the world today think they are #1 for some reason or another. We've just got the most to back up our claim.
"The United States has lost 1.3 million jobs to China in the last decade (CNN, Jan. 12, 2005)."
Is that net jobs or only those lost but not counting those gained through new trade? Why doesn't he point out the other side of the coin that in that period hundreds of millions of Chinese have been able to enter the middle class (based on their per capita standard), gain greater freedoms, adopt capitalism, create large new markets, finance a huge part of the U.S. deficit as well as keep inflation low through their producivity, all during a Pax Americana sacrificed for by the American taxpayer and American veterans? Otherwise we would be talking about the "sick man of Asia" instead of the vibrant, growing, reforming Asian trading partner with more of a stake in solving things peacefully than going to war. One North Korea is enough.
Mr. Rifkin's Pipe Dream
http://www.techcentralstation.com/092704B.html
As he is wont to do, Rifkin frequently invokes flawed assumptions and "facts" that are made up and contradicted by data. Contrary to his prognostications, the evidence suggests that if there is evolution toward greater congruence between the European and American Weltanschauungen, it will be the result of the Europeans moving in our direction, rather than the opposite. Recently, major German labor unions have agreed to work longer hours without additional pay, and the leaders of France, Germany and other countries are beginning to acknowledge that their profligate social welfare programs are unsustainable.
In stark rebuttal to Rifkin's paean to European society and institutions, European countries and their Union are, in comparison to the United States, in dire straits. They have aging populations and low birth rates, their productivity is in decline, and their economies are stagnant.
Everything in Europe is not on the decline, however: Stultifying taxation, over-regulation, obstruction of free markets, unemployment, anti-immigrant sentiment, anti-Semitism, and envy of the American economic miracle are alive and well.
Finally, Rifkin is an adviser to the president of the European Union, and it should come as no surprise that he fawns on the hand that feeds him.
Nice Dream If You Can Live It
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_37/b3899028_mz005.htm
But the bigger question challenging Rifkin's thesis is whether the European Dream is economically sustainable. The U.S. has roared back from recession, while growth in most of Euroland is anemic and unemployment remains high. What's more, Europe's aging workforce is straining its generous welfare and labor policies.
Rifkin agrees Europe's demographic shift is serious but says it can be resolved with more liberal immigration. He disagrees Europe is an underachiever. In fact, he reports, six European nations -- including Germany and France -- are more productive than the U.S., proving these countries "are even better at commerce than we are." Maybe so. But every major report I've seen on productivity growth -- by the European Commission, OECD, World Economic Forum, McKinsey, and the Conference Board -- bemoans how Europe is falling behind America. Measured by output per hour worked, U.S. productivity rose 2.6% in 2003. In the EU, the pace slowed to 0.8%, from an already weak 0.9% in 2002.
What gives? Rifkin himself uses Conference Board data, noting that while the average U.S. worker produced $38.83 of output per hour worked in 2002, the average German produced $39.39 and the French worker $41.85. There are problems with such a selective use of statistics. For one, this gap narrowed in 2003. Also, hourly output for the 15 EU nations averaged just $36.20 last year -- compared with $39.20 in the U.S. And there could be many reasons, other than Rifkin's suggestion that happier workers are more productive, to explain higher average output in some countries. Unemployment is higher across Europe, points out Conference Board economist Robert H. McGuckin. So perhaps those with jobs have higher skills.
Lessee now, our economy is the largest in the world (the E.U. keeps slipping in comparison) and our military is by far the best.
"We're No. 1!" That refrain is relentlessly sounding out now through much of the United States, as bowl-bound college football teams (all 50 of them, no less) ready for holiday-season tussles. Things are a bit awry, however, in Bowlsville. The once vaunted BCS, designed to determine a decisive No. 1, has seen the "C" rudely ripped from its pretty little acronym. This year it's the WCS - Worst-Case Scenario - with common sense slaughtered at the altar of the statistical crunch.
Also I haven't found the New York Times article from Decemeber 12th 2004 quoted by Ventura. There is an NYT article from that date with the 28/40 statistic from the OECD. But no other articles on that date with "literacy" in them. Nor have I found any statistics showing us as 49th in literacy, we seem to be around 15-20 in most studies.
Plagerism and BS alert (see post 51)
Wonder how much of this was for diversity training, and how much to keep track of insanely complex regulations? Also wonder how many of these workers are illegal?
"The U.S. and South Africa are the only two developed countries in the world that do not provide health care for all their citizens" (The European Dream, p.80).
Read the article about the British doctors that had a girl walking around with a backpack with food pumped directly into her stomach until she was SEVEN because the doctors misdiagnosed? When was the last time you heard of a child being sent from the US to France to get medical treatment unavailable in the US? How many Canadians come to the US for treatment because they don't want to wait months or years to get treatment in Canada?
Sometime in the next 10 years Brazil will probably pass the U.S. as the world's largest agricultural producer. Brazil is now the world's largest exporter of chickens, orange juice, sugar, coffee, and tobacco. Last year, Brazil passed the U.S. as the world's largest beef producer. (Hear that, you poor deluded cowboys?) As a result, while we bear record trade deficits, Brazil boasts a $30 billion trade surplus (NYT, Dec. 12, 2004).
What about the rain forest that's being cut down to finance this agricultural revolution? Get EPA, PETA, and OSHA down there and they'll take care of that.
One-third of our science teachers and one-half of our math teachers did not major in those subjects. (Quoted on The West Wing, but you can trust it – their researchers are legendary.)
Well, that tells me what an impeccable researcher you are. If it's on a sitcom, it must be true.
The Austin Chronicle is a flaky left-wing counter-culture newstand giveaway. About half of it is sex ads. This clown read, The European Dream, and decided to write the book in article form. I'll bet if you pick up a copy of the book (I won't), that every single statistic he quotes is in it, except the West Wing reference. He didn't go to those sources for the article, but quoted them and used the footnotes in the book to make his "exhaustive" list of statistics.
That's the terrible thing about having been a hack article writer. I now recognize all the lazy cheats I used to pull in other people's writings. I'm sure mine were just as obvious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.