Posted on 03/02/2005 5:05:06 AM PST by Brilliant
Now Congress is another matter. Congress has the power to gradually strangle SCOTUS until they get the message. To give a draconian example: Let's suppose POTUS provides temporary relief from a particularly onerous decision through lack of enforcement. Congress can really put the screws to SCOTUS by de-funding all but their salaries (everything...all..paper, pencils, telephone, everything period) Second step could be to gradually suspend US District and Circuit Courts (or at least the most egregious ones like the 9th circuit) all of which serve at the pleasure of Congress. Since SCOTUS has only appeal authority on most matters not involving disputes between the states, there would be no path to take ACLU issues to SCOTUS.
Plenty of disruption? You bet but it would work in a heartbeat. It would require many members of congress to grow eggs however and that is our (we the people) job.
I agree that Congress would be a better instrument for a long-term and possibly permanent chastisement of the Courts. Clearly an honorable and justified stand taken by President Bush could simply be undone by a future President.
Of course the same could occur with a change of power in Congress, but obviously undoing the things you suggest would be much harder than a reverse from the Executive branch.
Ideally though, the President and Congress would work together in such a bold and necessary move.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.