Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grounded: Millionaire John Gilmore stays close to home while making a point about privacy
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ^ | Sunday, February 27, 2005 | Dennis Roddy

Posted on 02/27/2005 6:43:24 PM PST by zeugma

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
Methinks John is doing good with this. The very concept of secret laws is distinctly unamerican.
1 posted on 02/27/2005 6:43:26 PM PST by zeugma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: zeugma

Good for him! I'd love to see him win. I remember when "your papers, please" was a standard element of anti-communist propaganda... and I'm not all that old.


2 posted on 02/27/2005 6:56:41 PM PST by thoughtomator (Unafraid to be unpopular)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
Same story
3 posted on 02/27/2005 6:59:18 PM PST by martin_fierro (Impetuous! Homeric!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
Gilmore started his own firm, sold it for more money than he seems to have bothered to count and has since devoted his time to giving it away to favored causes: drug law reform

OK...

4 posted on 02/27/2005 6:59:36 PM PST by LowOiL ("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" -Benjamin Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

Boo hoo. So maybe he gets the Supreme Court to mandate a more open set of laws governing airport security.

That'll be fixed in about, oh, A DAY. In fact I'll bet the Supreme Court will give the Congress and President the leeway to take care of it before they throw the airport system into a frenzy.

Please excuse me if I don't shed a tear if someone doesn't feel like identifying himself before boarding an airplane. I'm sure Mohammed Atta would have appreciated that privilege too.


5 posted on 02/27/2005 7:01:17 PM PST by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg1969

Turn in your conservative membership card.

The first element of the rule of representative government is that the people have the right to actually know the laws that they must follow.

The second is that they have the right for representation in the making of those laws.

Both were violated here.


6 posted on 02/27/2005 7:04:31 PM PST by TWohlford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

It's a no-brainer. If there's a problem on the plane, they need to know who is on it. Of course, if this man had his way, an escaped murderer could just buy a ticket and fly off. Also, the airlines could require the ID, even if the government didn't.


7 posted on 02/27/2005 7:08:15 PM PST by skr (May God bless those in harm's way and confound those who would do the harming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford
As you wish :) Seriously though, I'm all for the first step---getting the laws on the books. But let's have no illusions here: they will go on the books. Gillmore would prefer otherwise. He's basically playing the privacy equivalent of the "legalized marijuana and industrial hemp" game: everyone knows they just wanna smoke weed legally. Maybe that oughta be so, but let's just quit kidding ourselves about the motives, OK?
8 posted on 02/27/2005 7:11:13 PM PST by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mcg1969; TWohlford
"legalized marijuana and industrial hemp" ==> "legalized medical marijuana and industrial hemp"
9 posted on 02/27/2005 7:12:28 PM PST by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Congratulations to John Gilmore, a real American.
I wonder if it would be possible to have the police and TSA employees deported for violating their oath to support the U.S. Constitution and as a result of being fraudulently naturalized due to that violation.


10 posted on 02/27/2005 7:13:30 PM PST by henderson field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
Mr. Gilmore can spend some of those millions learning to fly and buy himself a plane.

Proving the point that you are not at the mercy of the government might be a stronger form of protest than trying to prove that you are.

11 posted on 02/27/2005 7:24:35 PM PST by Can i say that here?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mcg1969
I'm sure Mohammed Atta would have appreciated that privilege too.

But the hijackers had ID, so what makes you think requiring ID for travel stop terrorists? It can only be used against honest people.
12 posted on 02/27/2005 7:25:38 PM PST by cryptical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL
Gilmore started his own firm, sold it for more money than he seems to have bothered to count and has since devoted his time to giving it away to favored causes: drug law reform

OK...

That's ok lowoil, we don't expect drug warriors to support the Bill of Rights anyway.

13 posted on 02/27/2005 7:35:51 PM PST by zeugma (Come to the Dark Side...... We have cookies! (Made from the finest girlscouts!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mcg1969
That'll be fixed in about, oh, A DAY.

Yeah, Riiight. That is why they are fighting this so hard, when it could be fixed soooo easily.

Gilmore has it right. It wasn't as if we didn't know who Mohammed Atta was.

The whole idea of internal passports is wrong. It has the potential to turn us all into slaves. If the government knows everywhere you have been, what you have bought, and from who, no one is safe, and everyone can be found guilty of some law, some where, some time.

With our increasing technology, that is where internal passports leads.

14 posted on 02/27/2005 7:38:13 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

" Court of Star Chamber " comes to mind.


15 posted on 02/27/2005 7:38:49 PM PST by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skr
Also, the airlines could require the ID, even if the government didn't.

Sure, the airlines could require that. But, there is stiff competition among the airlines. One would start to *not* require ID. People would fly it or not, and we would see if there was a market for it.

16 posted on 02/27/2005 7:40:59 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: skr
Of course, if this man had his way, an escaped murder could just buy a ticket and fly off.

So? That was the case for ohh... 70 years, and it didn't kill us.

Tyranny is always justified with an appeal to safety. I'd rather be a little less safe and a little more free. You can fly the airline that requires ID. I'll fly the one that doesn't, or accepts private ID that the company vouches belongs to an American Citizen without a felony conviction.. or any of a thousand market alternatives that would do the job as well or better without worrying about government control run amuck, thank you very much.

17 posted on 02/27/2005 7:46:59 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mcg1969
"Boo hoo. So maybe he gets the Supreme Court to mandate a more open set of laws governing airport security.

That'll be fixed in about, oh, A DAY. In fact I'll bet the Supreme Court will give the Congress and President the leeway to take care of it before they throw the airport system into a frenzy.

Please excuse me if I don't shed a tear if someone doesn't feel like identifying himself before boarding an airplane. I'm sure Mohammed Atta would have appreciated that privilege too."

His court case isn't about being required to show ID. It's about the law, which people are expected to know and obey, being actually available for the public to review.

Unless you're like some nazi SS man who expects the law to be followed because someone in the uniform says it's the law, and no, you lowly peons can't see the text of the law for yourself.

(Did you like how I equated you with a nazi SS thug the same way you equated him with a terrorist? Kinda neat, eh?)

If this happened during the clinton years, and it was janet reno saying "no, you can't see the text of the law", you and everyone else here would be up in arms. That makes you a hypocrite. If you say you wouldn't be doing that, that makes you a liar.
18 posted on 02/27/2005 7:51:53 PM PST by flashbunny (Every thought that enters my head requires its own vanity thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

Gilmore has enough $$$ to charter a private jet. I have a buddy who has a jet charter company and when we go somewhere I'm never asked for ID:)


19 posted on 02/27/2005 8:03:32 PM PST by isthisnickcool (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

Posted: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1352087/posts

Then read his website: http://www.toad.com/gnu/
He's unable to travel because he refuses to present a government-approved ID
John Gimore: "In my spare time I practice Iyengar Yoga, read, listen to music....travel...., program, and socialize."

John Gilmore's homepage.

Disarming the United States. The Bush Administration should be forced by United Nations resolutions to surrender its "weapons of mass destruction" or face the consequences. "Any government that repeatedly threatens and attacks other soveriegn countries without provocation, that holds massive stocks of nuclear and conventional weapons, that tortures its own citizens and those of other countries, that refuses to follow its own constitution and laws as well as international treaties which it co-created and signed, that holds 500,000 political prisoners in its jails, that imprisons the largest number and percentage of its people in the world... Any such government needs to immediately disarm and submit to a regime change, or face the consequences from the international community." See also the Pictures from the Iraq war that the US tried to censor so that Americans could not see them.

For someone who likes to remain "isolated from government view", Gilmore charts his achievements and anything else he thinks you want to know about him and his issues on [self]privacy". You only have to follow the yellow brick road on his self promoting website. ;)



20 posted on 02/27/2005 8:05:31 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson