Skip to comments.
Ailing Specter Is Out of Groveling Mode, but Finding It Lonely in the Center
Washington Post ^
| February 25, 2005
| Dana Milbank
Posted on 02/24/2005 9:10:08 PM PST by Former Military Chick
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Former Military Chick
I'm sorry?
When were these judges rejected by the Senate?
If there'd been a vote, I'm sure I'd have heard about it...
2
posted on
02/24/2005 9:14:04 PM PST
by
jdege
To: Former Military Chick
"a moderate in the United States Senate" BS he is a L I B E R A L. He is a RINO. Now he is trying to thwart BUSH approintments again. It is up to the Senate Leadership of the Reps to confer with BUSH.
To: Former Military Chick
"A knot of reporters followed him, some to ask more questions, others to wish him Godspeed."
OK, OK, but were any of them conservative-friendly, and if so what are their sexual preferences???? THAT is the most important issue these days, isn't it?!?!?!
4
posted on
02/24/2005 9:16:58 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Individuality)
To: Former Military Chick
There is nothing moderate about this old man. He is every bit a liberal as the most noted liberal in this nation.
To: Former Military Chick
I wonder about Spector. I believe before all is said and done he will hurt conservative nominees while he sucks up to the left.
6
posted on
02/24/2005 9:21:47 PM PST
by
OKIEDOC
(LL THE)
To: Former Military Chick
We should have gotten rid of Specter as soon as he caved to the 'Rats on abortion.
7
posted on
02/24/2005 9:22:36 PM PST
by
mcenedo
(lying liberal media - our most dangerous and powerful enemy)
To: OKIEDOC
I wonder about Spector. I believe before all is said and done he will hurt conservative nominees while he sucks up to the left.
GW saved Spector's bacon by endorsing him in the Nov 2 election. Spector virtually promised that he would be supportive of GW's nominees. Guess you can't expect much more from a RINO tho.
8
posted on
02/24/2005 9:29:11 PM PST
by
conshack
To: mcenedo
Missed our chance to vanquish this RINO after Rove and Bush intervened. So what has he done for them lately?
9
posted on
02/24/2005 9:29:55 PM PST
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(This just in from CBS: "There is no bias at CBS")
To: mcenedo
ACtually he should have remained in the private sector and defended creeps who flee the United States and while out of the states his client gets convicted of murder.
Sorry he is ill but I just do not have a favorable opinion of the man.
To: Former Military Chick
Both parties are at fault," he said, even scolding Bush for "unheard-of" recess appointments of judges rejected by the Senate. An absolute lie:
The Founders created the recess-appointment power to assure that the judiciary could continue to function if circumstances or political factions prevented the Advise and Consent process from functioning effectively. Recess appointments have an impeccable historical pedigree; beginning with George Washington, presidents have made recess appointments to Article III courts. Since the Founding there have been more than 300 recess appointments of judges. President Eisenhower and Kennedy made 53 such appointments between them. Lest we forget, both Earl Warren and William Brennan were recess appointments to the Supreme Court by President Eisenhower (later confirmed by the Senate).
***Of course, these judges haven't BEEN rejected by the Senate at all.
11
posted on
02/24/2005 9:44:43 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
To: Former Military Chick
Curse this evil old SOB. I hope he gets sicker by the day.
12
posted on
02/24/2005 9:47:17 PM PST
by
mercy
(20 years a Gates sucker was enough!)
To: conshack
Senator Specter's November 18 press release is reproduced below.


November 18th, 2004
SENATOR SPECTER'S STATEMENT ON THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
Washington, D.C. - Senator Specter gave the following statement today on the Senate Judiciary Committee:
I have not and would not use a litmus test to deny confirmation to pro-life nominees. I voted to confirm Chief Justice Rehnquist after he had voted against Roe v. Wade. Similarly, I voted to confirm pro-life nominees, Justice Scalia, Justice OConnor and Justice Kennedy. I lead the successful fight to confirm Justice Thomas which almost cost me my Senate seat in 1992.
I have assured the President that I would give his nominees quick Committee hearings and early Committee votes so floor action could be promptly scheduled. I have voted for all of President Bushs judicial nominees in Committee and on the floor, and I have no reason to believe that Ill be unable to support any individual President Bush finds worthy of nomination. I believe I can help the President get his nominees approved just as I did on confirmation of two controversial Pennsylvania Circuit nominees when other, similarly situated Circuit nominees, were being filibustered.
I have already registered my opposition to the Democrats filibusters with 17 floor statements and will use my best efforts to stop any future filibusters. It is my hope and expectation that we can avoid future filibusters and judicial gridlock with a 55-45 Republican majority and election results demonstrating voter dissatisfaction with Democratic filibusters. If a rule change is necessary to avoid filibusters, there are relevant recent precedents to secure rule changes with 51 votes.
I intend to consult with my colleagues on the Committees legislative agenda, including tort reform, and will have balanced hearings with all viewpoints represented. I have long objected to the tactic used of bottling up civil rights legislation in the Judiciary Committee when it should have gone to the floor for an up or down vote. Accordingly, I would not support Committee action to bottle up legislation or a constitutional amendment, even one which I personally opposed, reserving my own position for the floor.
13
posted on
02/24/2005 9:51:17 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
To: Former Military Chick
President Bush and the Senate R's got exactly what they asked for. Good luck with this tool running the show.
14
posted on
02/24/2005 9:52:11 PM PST
by
GianniV
To: mercy
If I understand correctly, Specter has widly disseminated lymphoma, I believe Hodgkins Disease. He will have to undergo aggressive chemotherapy. Some of these cancers are responsive to chemo and some are not. Most are. I hope he is treated efficaciously by chemotherapy, but he will feel like hell for months while being treated. He should step down from committee chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee. If he will not, he should be relieved of what is sure to be a very high stress job.
To: Former Military Chick
"Having some disruption for days or even weeks is not a horrendous situation," said John Hart, a spokesman for freshman Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla).
Amen
16
posted on
02/24/2005 10:18:47 PM PST
by
RWR8189
(Its Morning in America Again!)
To: Former Military Chick
Milbank calling anyone a moderate is like is like the NYSLIMES calling dean a moderate
17
posted on
02/24/2005 10:21:04 PM PST
by
italianquaker
(CATHOLIC AND I VOTE BUSH=MANDATE)
To: Former Military Chick
Maybe G W Bush is finding out Arlen Sphincter is the same category of "friend" as Doug Wead.
Websters Dictionary:
treach·er·ous adj.
1. Marked by betrayal of fidelity, confidence, or trust; perfidious. See Synonyms at faithless.
2. Not to be relied on; not dependable or trustworthy.
3. aka Arlen Specter, Doug Wead
18
posted on
02/24/2005 10:48:59 PM PST
by
Babu
To: italianquaker
Apparently the Washington Post now has one whole floor that does nothing but churn out GOP bashing 24/7.
19
posted on
02/24/2005 10:50:11 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Free the Eason Jordan Tape!!!)
To: Texas Songwriter
Works for me. The creep has been in the senate forever. What a putz.
20
posted on
02/24/2005 10:55:27 PM PST
by
mercy
(20 years a Gates sucker was enough!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson