Posted on 02/24/2005 1:05:27 PM PST by Willie Green
Who are the city dwellers of whom you speak? Confused.
A - filet:
* Has few stressed muscles and therefore the best piece of the horse
B - Hind Quarters:
* is completely almost without fat
C - overhead panel
* is tender, juicy meat (in particular overhead panel of Ponys)
D - Semer and Semerrolle:
* meat to bar-b-que
E - front backs:
* steak meat
F - hochrippe:
* meat to bar-b-que and perfect for Gulasch
G - chest:
* ideal for sour roast
H - nose (elbow):
J - front leg meat:
I - belly rags,
K - rear leg meat,
L - necks,
M - head:
These are processing meats , e.g. for the production of
o Salami, crack sausage
o Cooked sausage
o special horse sausage (similar to basic sausage, but more larger and leaner)
o Basic sausage, bratwurst, Viennese...
* During the production of sausage products something pig fat is usually added, since horse fat does not possess sufficient cohesion, in order to hold the sausage together later.
A responsible horse owner would never keep more horses than he could reasonably care for. Anyone claiming that selling a horse to slaughter because there are no other "humane" options is lying.
"horse meat going for hundreds of dollars a pound"
I don't know where you get that idea from but all i'll say is that thousands of farmers WISH this were the case!!!!
Lots of people keep those weird little pot-bellied pigs as pets, I'll bet they get worked up about hogs being slaughtered. A young hog, by the way, is a very friendly and inquisitive critter.
But, common sense will tell you that at some point the horse will be sold for slaughter. Or a backhoe rented to bury it after hundreds of dollars in vet costs and time lost.
The prices for slaughter horses usually does not even cover the vet bills and transport, where a backhoe costs even more money.
For most it is not a hobby where financial losses are acceptable.
I don't think anyone wants to front an old horses home either. Like they do with successful retired racing horses.
Common sense is free. It is easy to find.
A responsible horse owner would never keep more horses than he could reasonably care for. Anyone claiming that selling a horse to slaughter because there are no other "humane" options is lying.
Ah, there's the rub. I'm not talking about responsible horse owners here. I'm talking about people who don't take care of their animals. It is more humane for these animals to be taken to slaughter than to be left to starve. Starving horses are common all over this country. It is a major concern for all horse people. We can't take them all in. There are many people doing wonderful work in horse rescue, but lets be honest here, a horse is not a dog or cat. It takes money to keep a horse correctly. Add to the problems of a large animal that has a bad attitude and you can have a real problem. I'd rather see one sent to slaughter than left in an overgrazed pasture with no care. I take care of mine until the time comes and then I put them down. But I have money and I have land to bury them. In a perfect world, everyone would take care of their kids and animals, but this isn't a perfect world and we have to deal with it as it is. Slaughter is the only humane option in some cases.
You seem like a reasonably intelligent individual so you should understand the difference. People name horses same as they name their dogs and cats. Are you also an advocate of using euthanized dogs and cats from the pound for human consumption also?
If so, then you are consistent and you have my apologies.
I was not meanin cars for I truly love animals they for the most part all taste great...heck even a chunk of fresh road kill is not to bad for the palate
"People name horses same as they name their dogs and cats"
Dairy farmer up the road from my parents had names for all his cows, people name their prize steers/hogs whathaveyous as well. I have nothing against people eating cats and dogs (Asians do) although - as with horses - I wouldnt eat em.
I don't care what people eat. They can eat each other for all I care.
My point is that we are an affluent enough society that we Americans shouldn't have to lower ourselves to eating horses, dogs, cats, snails, monkeys, etc. like the rest of the third world. (europe included)
Fair enough. I wouldn't lower myself to it either ... i think the idea, however, is to sell the meat to the French or Japanese though.
Wouldn't that be the same as selling dead humans to cannibalistic tribes because we are above eating dead humans ourselves?
I am quite capable of eating anything that does not eat me first.
I dont agree with the kind of post-modern thinking that puts humans on the same ethical plane with other animals ... so, no it isnt.
It is whack jobs like this female and her group that are a slap in the face to the American people
Ya'll might have to change you're opinion of eating pork
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1350203/posts
Let me get my cloven hoof out of my butt..........
LOL! (worms were the reason for not eating pork) But who knew!
agreed
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.