Science's New Heresy Trial: (Persecution of Scientific Thought)

Discovery Institute News ^ | February 18, 2005 | Gene Edward Veith, World Magazine

[chuckwalla]

I never said creationism was science.
Science is a way of understanding creation it is not meant to understand everything.
If you can't answer the questions necessary to prove that science is the end all but creation does then creation trumps.
Science has been wrong before and will be wrong again.
Because you can't see that does not creation a myth.
Even in this thread you exceed at not seeing beyond your flat earth geocentric theory.
Your mental block only blocks you.
With such inability to see I find it rather illogical that you can call anything beyond your limitation a myth.
You simply do not know and science cannot see.
If you could answer the basic questions I have posed satisfactorily then you can call something a myth. But just calling something a myth does not make it so.
Answer the questions or admit you are falling far short of understanding the universe.

[Publius Scipio]

Save your pinheaded gibberish for someone who cares.

[chuckwalla]

Apparently "pinhead gibberish" is way above your intelligence level since you neither understand it nor can you answer it in any intelligent way.
Name calling is the extent of your intelligence.
Pitiful.

[G Larry]

In league with your condescension, your religious bigotry and conceit are palpable.

I never mention religion or the Bible.
My only reference is to the lack of science in the promotion of evolutionary theory.

So as not to overwhelm you, I provide the following from an 8th grade Biology text:
The basic scientific method:

1. Observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomena.
2. Formulation of a hypothesis to explain the phenomena. The hypothesis often takes the form of a causal mechanism.
3. Use of the hypothesis to predict the existence of other phenomena, or to predict quantitatively the results of new observations.
4. Performance of experimental tests of the predictions by several independent experimenters and properly performed experiments.

Evolutionary texts turn step #2 into a self eating watermelon, by stacking hypothesis end to end to declare a conclusion.
No alternative solution is necessary to recognize the omission of steps 1, 3, and 4!

[shubi]

The Theory of Evolution is the most substantiated theory in science history.

Sorry if you can't understand the facts.

[G Larry]

I understand the crap evolutionists try to sell, and the stories don't hold up under scrutiny.

Like 'Lucy' who supposedly owned a hip bone and a knee bone found half a mile apart and meters apart in soil depth.

After evloutionists tired of defending the lack of fossil evidence to support transition of one species to another, they adopted the theory that species evolved independantly from single cell animals that one day decided to "invent sex".

What in the hell is substantiated about that?

[shubi]

www.talkorigins.com

[G Larry]

Yes, you might try that URL.
Its as substantial as the rest of your theories.