Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Explore Meth's Role in Immune System
NY Times ^ | February 22, 2005 | ANAHAD O'CONNOR

Posted on 02/22/2005 8:55:44 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Nuzcruizer
It only stands to reason that if one warms up the human body a couple degrees on a continuous basis, it becomes the perfect incubator for a whole variety of diseases, giving them a chance to mutate and adapt to it's host. Plus the hosts immune system can become compromised giving these viruses a chance to defeat them.

Where did you take your classes in immunology and microbiology?

My teachers taught that a fever was a defensive response to thwart an invading pathogen.

21 posted on 02/22/2005 10:38:33 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Its all Reagan's fault.


22 posted on 02/22/2005 11:24:04 PM PST by MRMEAN (This Tag-Line Is Evolving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ethrane
I have my doubts that methamphetamine does much to weaken the immune system.

Maybe its the side effects -- staying up for 3 to 4 days has to be physically stressful, and stress can depress immune function.

23 posted on 02/23/2005 4:45:04 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Petronius
Making alcohol illegal increased the popularity of more potent forms of it. I think this is indisputable

That's interesting. Do you have a link for that?

I know that homemade "bathtub gin" was usually more powerful and sometimes more dangerous than conventional alcohol, but I never realized that it was becuase of a demand for stronger alcohol.

24 posted on 02/23/2005 6:30:26 AM PST by TomB ("The terrorist wraps himself in the world's grievances to cloak his true motives." - S. Rushdie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; All
And so it comes full circle...

Dr. Peter Duesberg has been ridiculed for this belief since the eighties.

http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/index/pduesberg.htm

Col Sanders

25 posted on 02/23/2005 7:47:03 AM PST by Col Sanders (I ought to tear your no-good Goddang preambulatory bone frame, and nail it to your government walls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomB
I know that homemade "bathtub gin" was usually more powerful and sometimes more dangerous than conventional alcohol, but I never realized that it was becuase of a demand for stronger alcohol.

The supposedly increased demand for a stronger anything with any prohibition is not the case. It's another story of unintended consequences. When the penalty is the same, but the economic reward is so much greater, criminal smuggling on the black market will naturally tend towards the substance with more bang for the buck per unit weight, i.e. concentrations of active substances will tend to increase.

So rational smugglers will trade in hard liquor rather than beer, heroin rather than raw opium, crack or cocaine rather than coca leaves, etc. whenever a prohibition exists.

The subject of addiction has become extensive. Try reading the following pdf link at least until it deals with the American Whiskey Rebellion of 1791 with the same taxes on lower quality spirits as those on higher quality whiskey. It's the other side of what you get when the government distorts the market.

http://www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cj19n2/cj19n2-7.pdf

26 posted on 02/23/2005 9:03:12 AM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

This was the theory I threw out there, in laymans terms ofcurse, when these stories first started to make the news.


27 posted on 02/23/2005 9:05:43 AM PST by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Col Sanders
And so it comes full circle...

Dr. Peter Duesberg has been ridiculed for this belief since the eighties.

I'm familiar with Dr. Duesberg. How do you account for the effect of anti-retroviral medications on the decreased mortality of folks who are HIV positive, on the decreased vertical transmission from pregnant mother to child at childbirth by the short term use of those same medications, and the death by an AIDS diagnosis of healthcare personnel from accidental exposure to HIV?

28 posted on 02/23/2005 9:16:39 AM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
. . . the drug's tendency to dry out mucosal membranes . . .

Losing Teeth Latest Meth Use Side Effect

29 posted on 02/23/2005 9:16:41 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
How do you account for...

I account for nothing.  I merely stated that the theory reflected in the story was not a new one.

If you have a bone to pick with Duesberg, I would suggest you take it up with him, perhaps at one of the many conferences he attends around the world discussing his theories.

Col Sanders

30 posted on 02/25/2005 9:12:33 AM PST by Col Sanders (I ought to tear your no-good Goddang preambulatory bone frame, and nail it to your government walls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson