Posted on 02/20/2005 5:39:50 PM PST by Lando Lincoln
Lando
The folks over at DU have been talking about little else than Gannon for days. I guess they think Gannon is payback for Dan Rather.
Not to mention details in Gary Aldrich's book that make this much ado about nothing seem like kindergarten.
Gannon is supposed to be an object lesson in "knowing your place"
This whole sordid affair goes to underscore two points: first, that homosexuality remains a despicable vice in the public eye, and second, that the left is perfectly willing to use the first as a club to beat down dissent.
Yup, and Gannon has already resigned anyway. There's not enough traction here.
Wouldn't anyone who is striving to live a better life than he has in the past qualify as a hypocrite?
--- This whole sordid affair goes to underscore two points: first, that homosexuality remains a despicable vice in the public eye, and second, that the left is perfectly willing to use the first as a club to beat down dissent. ---
It IS a despicable vice.
Now we all can remember why the U.S. military used to forbid it outright. It makes those who practice it subject to blackmail and therefore, a security risk.
This also demonstrates the absolute, utter, hypocricy of the left. They *pretend* not to care about homosexual behavior, yet they use this guy's behavior as grounds for making a public stoning of him.
Ho-Hum! This is a story with no legs. End of story!!!
Liberals get so mad when gays and minorities don't know their place.
Does this mean Barney Frank can't get into the white House either? - tom
I wonder if this Aravosis clown has a list of gay Bush-friendly reporters to wave around?
"Wonder if Jennings, Holbrooke, and Charlie Rose would like a public airing of their wife swapping escapades."
Who cares whether they like it or not? I've heard some bit of these stories. I say shout it from the rooftops, and make it as sordid and salacious as possible. Please post any nude pictures that are available. What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
I first became acquainted with John Hinderaker during the Rather affair. I must say he writes extremely well and has a gift for explaining the despicable behavior of the left.
The left hates a homosexual who doesn't play their games, just as it hates a black who doesn't play their games, or a Hispanic who doesn't play their games. These people leave the plantation at great risk. They tried to do the same thing to Clarence Thomas that they've done to Gannon.
Yes, Gannon. If that's the name he wants to use, why the hell shouldn't he?
And what is more, they saw what kind of power the blogs wielded with regards to Eason Jordan, and they're hoping to wield it here with Jeff Gannon. The problem is, at the risk of sounding tawdry they blew their wad on a tiny little flea (Jeff Gannon).
So now what to do with all this firepower they think they have? Well, find something big (like Karl Rove) to aim at and see if they can hit. Well, it ain't gonna work. We had a REAL STORY to pin on Eason Jordan; they ain't got squat on Karl.
What galls me to no end is that Avarosis is the gay activist who threatened to "out" all the gay members of Congress and their staff if they supported the ban against same sex marriage. He is also the fool that started DearMary.com - a website devoted to harassing Mary Cheney about her Dad's support of the gay marriage ban. So a gay activist is spending his time beating up on someone because of their sex life? I think it is an extension of Avarosis' gay-outing threat. If you are a conservative and a homosexual, you'd better watch your back. Wonder if Mr. Avarosis has any skeletons in his closet that would make good "blog" fodder?
Harken back to the Clinton Administration. Every day there was a new scandal, real ones, in response to which the MSM attack dogs would lounge on the porch and barely flicker an eyebrow.
the good old days of bimbo eruptions.
Perhaps Hitlary will carry on the tradition.
Judging from the fevered hysteria of the gay activists , it seems that their primary objection to Gannon-was that he was gay.
hmm perhaps that explains Specters looney leftism...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.