Skip to comments.
Starburst Was One of Brightest Objects Observed on Earth
NY Times ^
| February 18, 2005
| KENNETH CHANG
Posted on 02/18/2005 9:31:11 PM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: neverdem
The dimmest object ever observed on Earth:
... and the widest object ever observed on Earth:
21
posted on
02/18/2005 11:35:27 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
(If Islam is a religion, so is Liberal!)
To: neverdem
I'll read it tomorrow. I just read:
Starbucks Was One of Brightest Objects Observed on Earth
It's 2:30 am..lol
22
posted on
02/18/2005 11:39:17 PM PST
by
Recall
To: neverdem
It was really done to fool the Cylons...
23
posted on
02/18/2005 11:42:33 PM PST
by
WestVirginiaRebel
("Senator, we can have this discussion in any way that you would like.")
To: neverdem
Here's a picture!
To: neverdem
Since the object in question is 50 thousand light years away, the December event is a "delayed report" of an event at the object 50 thousand years ago (supposing that the speed of light in a vacuum really is constant over time).
Likely there are many other "delayed reports" out there. For all we know, the center of our galaxy detonated thousands of years ago and will, in due course, sweep away our world entirely. It's due for something like that anyway (2Pet3:10-13), although the timing is obscure.
To: neverdem
26
posted on
02/19/2005 4:30:30 AM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
To: King Prout
dead star went boom. It's fallen and it can't get up.
27
posted on
02/19/2005 8:05:33 AM PST
by
jriemer
(We are a Republic not a Democracy)
To: neverdem
It's called SGR 1806-20 and is in the constellation Sagittarius, which is abbreviated SGR, so I thought the designation must be from its location until I read that SGR means "soft gamma repeater." Good thing it wasn't a hard gamma repeater.
Its magnetic field is a quadrillion times that of earth. We're talking serious numbers here--one quadrillion is 1000 times one trillion.
Meanwhile, today is the birthday of Nicolaus Copernicus, the founder of modern astronomy.
To: neverdem
This happened just before or just after the big tsunami?
29
posted on
02/19/2005 8:09:42 AM PST
by
Amelia
To: neverdem
As I've been saying for years, this is the main reason why we should not transport White Castles cheeseburgers into the sun.
30
posted on
02/19/2005 8:39:55 AM PST
by
P.O.E.
To: PatrickHenry
The NASA news release was linked in the first comment. I find that it's interesting to have more than one perspective. Thank's for the other link.
31
posted on
02/19/2005 9:47:21 AM PST
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
From the article you linked:
Another clue to the pulsar/magnetar difference may lie in how fast neutron stars are spinning when they form. Gaensler and his team suggest that heavy stars will form neutron stars spinning at up to 500-1000 times per second. Such rapid rotation should power a dynamo and generate superstrong magnetic fields. 'Normal' neutron stars are born spinning at only 50-100 times per second, preventing the dynamo from working and leaving them with a magnetic field 1000 times weaker, says Gaensler.HA! I knew there was something weird about that rotation rate!. Thanks for the link Ernest.
32
posted on
02/19/2005 10:49:09 AM PST
by
zeugma
(Come to the Dark Side...... We have cookies! (Made from the finest girlscouts!))
To: zeugma
The bigger those stars are , the more they have magical properties. If you haven't read thru all of that link at post #17, try to find the time, it is quite good. The Universe is an astounding place. A great Book Reference is 100 Billion Suns, although it is somewhat dated, nothing about Magnetars, as I recall. My Son has my copy, so I can't check.
33
posted on
02/19/2005 11:09:34 AM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
To: neverdem
Makes me wonder what's the possibility of a star exploding nearby and causing massive comm failure worldwide.
34
posted on
02/19/2005 2:26:41 PM PST
by
Bogey78O
(Hillary Clinton + Fertility pills + Scott Peterson + rowboat = Success)
To: thoughtomator
I hear Moore is much fatter. His mass is so huge though it distorts his true appearance.
35
posted on
02/19/2005 2:28:11 PM PST
by
Bogey78O
(Hillary Clinton + Fertility pills + Scott Peterson + rowboat = Success)
To: Bogey78O
Makes me wonder what's the possibility of a star exploding nearby and causing massive comm failure worldwide. If by expoding star you mean a supernova, there are three likely candidates nearby, astronomically speaking: Betelgeuse in Orion, Antares in Scorpio and Ras Algethi in Hercules. They are 430, 600 and 380 light years away, respectively.
Chances of one of those three becoming a supernova in the near future seem slim.
Someone more knowledgeable than me will have to address the subject of communications disruptions.
The visual effect would be stunning: image a pinpoint of light brighter than the aggregate light of the full moon --but not as bright as the sun.
There is an interesting discussion of supernovae at this web site:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/supernova/
36
posted on
02/19/2005 4:49:05 PM PST
by
ngc6656
To: ngc6656
Ever since I stopped studying astronomy in junior high it's all greek to me.
37
posted on
02/19/2005 8:26:33 PM PST
by
Bogey78O
(*tagline removed per request*)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; KevinDavis
38
posted on
02/20/2005 2:01:20 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
("Are you an over due book? Because you've got FINE written all over you!")
Comment #39 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson