Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TFB testimony: 'Scrap' corridor concept (Trans-Texas Corridor
Texas Agriculture ^ | February 18 , 2005 | Mike Barnett

Posted on 02/18/2005 8:05:46 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
Also, from the Herald-Democrat:

The right track? Fannin residents kick the tires on proposed Trans-Texas Corridor

By Vicki Graves
Herald Democrat

BONHAM - Local residents attended a three-hour Trans-Texas Corridor exhibit Tuesday night at Bonham High School, taking the opportunity to review large maps of preliminary corridor alternatives, learn more about the TTC environmental study, ask questions and make comments.

The proposed Trans-Texas Corridor, an 800-mile-long project from Oklahoma to Mexico, would include roadways, rail and a dedicated utility zone.

It includes all or part of 77 Texas counties and several alternative routes are being considered.

The idea, though opposed by environmentalists, rural landowners and small towns that possibly would die as a result of traffic diversion, is to improve the movement of goods and people, address long term transportation needs and promote economic development.

The Fannin County people were concerned about their farms and ranches.

One proposed route would take in a large part of extreme western Fannin County all the way from the north county line to the south county line, as well as part of eastern Grayson County.

Another possible route would take in the extreme southeastern corner, which is a very small section, of Fannin County.

Residents attending the exhibit filled out forms for their comments and some spoke with a person available to transcribe and enter their comments electronically.

They also noted, and informed project development directors on hand, that the proposed Lake Ralph Hall is not included on TxDOT's corridor alternatives map.

The TTC might affect that proposed project, which would be near Ladonia and the southeastern Fannin County line.

The corridor alternatives map shows that possible route crossing Hunt County, coming across the southeastern corner of Fannin County and continuing through Lamar County to Oklahoma.

1 posted on 02/18/2005 8:05:54 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; anymouse; B-Chan; barkeep; basil; ...

Late-Night Trans-Texas Corridor PING!

Please let me know if you want on or off this list.


2 posted on 02/18/2005 8:07:16 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Deport 'em all; let Fox sort 'em out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
"...it appears to us that the legislature has given the Texas Department of Transportation what amounts to a blank check worth approximately $180 billion," Thompson said on Feb. 9. "We would feel more comfortable if citizens had the opportunity to voice opinions with elected officials who should have the responsibility of making decisions regarding the future of the Trans Texas Corridor.

"We ask that the legislature take responsibility for approving projects relating to this corridor, if it is to continue. More importantly, we believe this corridor concept should be scrapped and future highway planning be given serious oversight by the legislature."

my thoughts exactly.

i got repuked a couple weeks ago for saying so.

i'm for building freeways, but we need accountability.

3 posted on 02/18/2005 8:14:40 PM PST by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

JUST SAY NO TO THIS STUPID TTC PROPOSAL.


4 posted on 02/18/2005 8:20:28 PM PST by Indie (Ignorance of the truth is no excuse for stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21
Ken21 No need to apologize. This entire project is very ill conceived. I have found that State Legisltures are very much "out of the loop."

BTW, I had these folks on my show today. They maybe part of an alternative to the Texas Corridor Plan. Bring Texas high speed rail. At the same time improve existing Interstate system and build new highways in a practical manner.http://texasrailadvocates.org/

5 posted on 02/18/2005 8:21:43 PM PST by davidtalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Also, from the Herald Democrat article:

Vicki Graves
Herald Democrat

Fannin County residents, at Bonham High School, visit with Texas Department of Transportation engineers about the proposed Trans Texas Corridor.

6 posted on 02/18/2005 8:22:01 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Deport 'em all; let Fox sort 'em out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davidtalker

thanks.


7 posted on 02/18/2005 8:24:46 PM PST by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I'm not quite sure I understand how this massive highway from mexico to Ok will help Texas. I mean what is in Ok? Seems like all we are doing is building a transportation corridor that goes from mexico to the country's interior. If you need to move your product from mexico to the NE US then why build distribution centers in Texas when it makes more sense to build them at the most interior point of this massive conveyor...
8 posted on 02/18/2005 8:26:20 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead (I believe in American Exceptionalism! Do you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Diddle E. Squat; deport; maui_hawaii; Ben Ficklin; zeugma; MeekOneGOP; ...
Pro TTC Ping!

This is a pro Trans-Texas Corridor ping list.

Please let me know by Freepmail if you want on or off the list.

9 posted on 02/18/2005 8:26:33 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


A map of possible alternatives for TTC-35.


10 posted on 02/18/2005 8:30:37 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Here are some links various Freepers have posted on other Trans Texas Corridor (TTC) threads on Free Republic



Paleo Conservative


Free Republic search on keyword "TTC"

Interview (Audio) NPR | February 8, 2005 A Superhighway for Texas?



Diddle E. Squat


Here's the website with more info and explanation:

http://www.keeptexasmoving.org/

Here's a list of meetings where you can ask questions(and I encourage everyone who can to attend and ask questions)

http://www.keeptexasmoving.org/pdfs/TTC-35_Public_Meetings.pdf

Here's a link to the map of the TTC-35 corridor alternatives, which are approximately 10 miles wide study areas (the actual selected single corridor will be at most 1/4 mile wide):

http://www.keeptexasmoving.org/pdfs/TTC- 35_Alternatives_Map.pdf



Ben Ficklin

The Oklahoma Extension

La Entrada al Pacifico

1990-2000 Population Growth of Border Metro Areas

Bidders for TTC contract

NHS High Priority Corridors

Texas Sets the Pace in Highway Finance

Ray Perryman's Economic Benefit Analysis Of TTC



maui_hawaii

Port of Houston teams up with Panama to draw a piece of Asia's massive trade away from West Coast

11 posted on 02/18/2005 8:31:08 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead

All this does is bring Texas more concrete and pollution and WE get the bill.


12 posted on 02/18/2005 8:34:09 PM PST by SouthTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for the ping!


13 posted on 02/18/2005 8:53:37 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
I'm not quite sure I understand how this massive highway from mexico to Ok will help Texas.

It will help keep Mexican trucks off regular Texas highways.

14 posted on 02/18/2005 8:57:00 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SouthTexas; Texas_Jarhead; PAR35
All this does is bring Texas more concrete and pollution and WE get the bill.

Look at the location of the corridors. They are well outside of cities. By diverting long distance traffic away from cities they will decrease pollution emitted in cities. Also by diverting traffic away from cities, congestion in those cities is decreased and cars operate more cleanly when they can maintain speed rather than have to start and stop frequently. Houston's air quality improved in the late eighties and nineties as freeway projects improved the flow of traffic.

15 posted on 02/18/2005 9:39:35 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
It will help keep Mexican trucks off regular Texas highways.

Do you really think that mexican truckers who are probably lucky to make $20/day are going to be paying these tolls? I doubt it. This is nothing but a boondoggle brought to you courtesy of democrat gov. Perry and his cronys.

16 posted on 02/18/2005 9:41:52 PM PST by zeugma (Come to the Dark Side...... We have cookies! (Made from the finest girlscouts!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SouthTexas; Diddle E. Squat
more concrete and pollution and WE get the bill.

No, the users get the bill. Considering that trucks will be able to travel at 85 mph on their own lanes, it means drivers will be able to cover more miles in a day especially considering they will avoid urban congestion during rush hour.

17 posted on 02/18/2005 9:42:19 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
Do you really think that mexican truckers who are probably lucky to make $20/day are going to be paying these tolls?

There are limits on how many consecutive hours truck drivers are allowed to operate their trucks. Between faster speed limits and avoidance of urban congestion, Mexican truckers will be able to reach there destinations faster if they use the toll roads.

18 posted on 02/18/2005 9:45:21 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Ok, that makes some sense. Shifting long haul traffic away from pop areas. Traffic in the population centers, however, will only decline by a volume equal to traffic that need not come to town. If we talk about Houston then I'm not sure I understand how the project would reduce traffic in the Houston area. I mean if the traffic is coming from down south and it needs to head to the SE US then it will still have to cross Texas and would likely travel I-10 through Houston. Seems to me that this particular thoroughfare will have only a minimal affect on Houston. As for SA, Austin, and Dallas I could imagine a more significant impact.


19 posted on 02/18/2005 9:48:43 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead (I believe in American Exceptionalism! Do you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I've looked at the maps now and see that the plans include a loop aroound the Houston metro area.


20 posted on 02/18/2005 9:52:24 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead (I believe in American Exceptionalism! Do you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson