Posted on 02/18/2005 9:55:18 AM PST by Willie Green
So we should be so lucky to have it like it was in the '70s and we will be better off to have the lifestyles that the Chinese, Japanese, and German economies afford their citizens? No thanks. If having a balanced trade means earning less, higher taxes, and paying more for home-grown goods (like EU), I'll pass. Hasn't exactly worked out so well for them, since they can't even afford their own goods.
Nevertheless, economic conditions in Japan have become so difficult that Japanese babies have become rare and Japan's population is decreasing.
Could it be that young Japanese see that their parents and grand-parents, who had hoped to live on the interest earned by their savings, are being cheated by the government's low interest rate policies?
BTW, on my last trip to Japan, I saw many of Japan's "invisible" unemployed sleeping in parks in Tokyo. I wonder if Japan's unemployment rate be higher if unemployment benefits were offered in Japan.
Free trade bump!
"Let London manufacture those fine fabrics of hers to her heart's content; let Holland her chambrays; Florence her cloth; the Indies their beaver and vicuna; Milan her brocade, Italy and Flanders their linens...so long as our capital can enjoy them; the only thing it proves is that all nations train their journeymen for Madrid, and that Madrid is the queen of Parliaments, for all the world serves her and she serves nobody."
(Prominent Spanish official - Alfonso Nunez de Castro in 1675)
"Let London manufacture those fine fabrics of hers to her heart's content; let Holland her chambrays; Florence her cloth; the Indies their beaver and vicuna; Milan her brocade, Italy and Flanders their linens...so long as our capital can enjoy them; the only thing it proves is that all nations train their journeymen for Madrid, and that Madrid is the queen of Parliaments, for all the world serves her and she serves nobody."
(Prominent Spanish official - Alfonso Nunez de Castro in 1675)
This is the common argument for dealing with Chinese tyrants. (ie. Yes, we are making the tyrants richer by buying more Chinese goods but eventually, the slaves will free themselves.)
When does that happen?
Making tyranny more profitable to a tyrant ends the tyranny?
International trade is as old as man yet globalization remains a scare tactic for the far right and far left, who are as ejamacated as titmice when you combine the intelligence http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1345344/posts
And how do you propose we do this? Is oil use going up, or down? And WE don't own the oil, mostly the Arabs do, since we searched it out for them, built the refineries, and then let them nationalize it. Who's to say the Chinese won't nationalize our stakes in their factories over there? They already are majority owner in them.
"and can afford imported goods"
That's about all we can afford. Without Chinese and Vietnamese imports, many Americans couldn't afford nearly as much 'stuff' as they can now.
FYI median income in the US has been down the last several years...
As America writes off more and more industries and stops competing with foreign companies, we lose not only the maufacturing side of it but also engineer, scientists and tech people who would have worked in Reasearch and Development for those products/industries.
That is one of the big negatives.
I do see something positive about the huge trade deficit:
All the blue collar, undereducated class may finally get off their lazy asses and start taking night school courses to get certified (or get a degree) in a high tech profession that is more insulated from our manufacturing base going overseas.
Also, the damn schools may be forced to start teaching more math and science and computer courses in the high schools to better prepare our studnets to work in the 21st century.
Let London manufacture those fine fabrics of hers to her heart's content; let Holland her chambrays; Florence her cloth; the Indies their beaver and vicuna; Milan her brocade, Italy and Flanders their linens...so long as our capital can enjoy them; the only thing it proves is that all nations train their journeymen for Madrid, and that Madrid is the queen of Parliaments, for all the world serves her and she serves nobody."
(Prominent Spanish official - Alfonso Nunez de Castro in 1675)
Good grief you're a worry wart. Calm down. A trade deficit means a lot of things good and bad but the reason we have one is because we are so rich and we like to buy things from overseas.
I'm a worry wart because I posted a fact that US median income is going down on a yearly basis? Please explain how that is a "worry free" scenario. Thx.
I'm sorry to be joining this thread late and I didn't see your post about median income. Please refer me to the post number and I will respond to it specifically.
Of course median income has gone down in the last few years, we just came off of a bubble. In the late nineties computer geeks were strutting around like gods. They were being hired by companies who needed them for not much more than window dressing as the companies took themselves public with no earnings and no prospect of earnings. BUBBLE. We have them about every twenty or thirty years.
I remember meeting a lot of them at the smoking patio of our building. "Ohhhh, yessss, the Y2K is a biiiggggg, thing. It could destroy the country."
So, in my capacity as a financial planner and investment manger I would ask them: Are you participating in your employer's retirement plan.
Oh hell no. I'm not staying here. I have bigger fish to fry.
Bottom line, these were the guys who were making all the money in the late nineties. They were so full of themselves that they thought the world couldn't function without them. Guess what.
If you refute the data, provide a better source.
Didn't say anything was wrong with the data. Just love it when protectionists on this site post from lefty sources.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.