Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What's on Peter Jennings' radar? The truth about UFOs
Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^ | Tuesday, February 15, 2005 | MELANIE McFARLAND

Posted on 02/16/2005 5:12:11 PM PST by Momaw Nadon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: Kevin OMalley

I would also suggest reading any of Professor David Jacobs books, 'Secret Life' and 'The Threat'. Jacobs has made the study of UFOs his life work, while remaining a respected faculty member of Temple University in Philadelphia. Jacobs work is nothing to dismiss out of hand. There is none of the sensationalism, no shocking photos, but the body of work is substantial and impressive. Jacobs has a website which is worth a look if you're interested in either his work, or the UFO subject in general:

http://www.ufoabduction.com/


41 posted on 02/16/2005 6:49:44 PM PST by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mad Mammoth

No thanks. I don't find any useful information in the whole abduction thing.


42 posted on 02/16/2005 6:54:49 PM PST by Kevin OMalley (No, not Freeper#95235, Freeper #1165: Charter member, What Was My Login Club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
Here is Peter's first guest . . .
43 posted on 02/16/2005 7:10:56 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Peter himself in a candid shot . . . "Make-Up!"
44 posted on 02/16/2005 7:13:33 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ScottFromSpokane

Approx 20% of the sightings reported by reputable citizens of this country and across the world are not explainable.

Most are some kind of natural or man made phenomena. But that 20% does represent something, and until it is proven what that 20% is, your statement is a complete falsehood.


45 posted on 02/16/2005 7:27:00 PM PST by Leatherneck_MT (What are you? Lion or Lamb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BullDog108; All

Thanks.

I don't know that this is worth bothering the UFO ping list about. What do you think?

What do the rest of you on the ping list already on this thread think about pinging the whole list--is it really worth bothering them about?


46 posted on 02/16/2005 8:09:03 PM PST by Quix (HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING IT'S POWER. 2 TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT

You yourself admit that 80% of UFO sightings represent "man made or natural phenomena," but my statement that "UFO reports did not represent a single phenomenon" is "a complete falsehood"?

That's the kind of logic that's gotten UFOlogy where it is today.


47 posted on 02/16/2005 8:27:17 PM PST by ScottFromSpokane (http://drunkengop.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

Was Peter walking past Dan's fax machine again recently ?


48 posted on 02/16/2005 8:40:12 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix

The thread hasn't gone very far yet, maybe it will - or not.


49 posted on 02/16/2005 8:46:10 PM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Peter Jennings has built one of the most respected reputations in television journalism.

I will read the rest of the story, after I dry my eyes and get my breath back.

50 posted on 02/16/2005 8:50:46 PM PST by razorback-bert (An ASC-American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

What's the frequency?


51 posted on 02/16/2005 8:51:45 PM PST by Danae (In waking a Tiger, use a long stick - R. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Probably because of the 2/6/05 thread.

Upcoming Events: Peter Jennings UFO Special on TV: February 24, 2005

52 posted on 02/16/2005 9:05:23 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree; All; ALASKA; albertp; andysandmikesmom; areafiftyone; aruanan; A South Park Republican; ..

Guess I'm going to have to try and watch it. Will have to make a note to myself and post it on my screen!

GIVEN THE WHOOPLA and who Jennings is . . .

sure could end up with some incremental disclosures. It must be AT LEAST setting the stage for something revelatory in the not too distant future.

UFO PING LIST PING. Please let me know if you want on or off the list.


53 posted on 02/17/2005 4:47:58 AM PST by Quix (HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING IT'S POWER. 2 TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: festus

54 posted on 02/17/2005 5:18:09 AM PST by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ScottFromSpokane; Leatherneck_MT

You two are are talking past each other.

Scott: Your statement is NOT accurate, in the sense that you can not prove it unless you discount the unexplained 20% of sighings.

Leatherneck: Scott's statement was not a "complete falsehood" but it was not accurate, either, as I explain above. There are indeed a number of loons out there that muddy the Ufological waters, and Scott was just a little overeager to point that out.


55 posted on 02/17/2005 6:39:13 AM PST by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

Eighty million Americans? That's one in three. I've lived 60 years without meeting one of these 80 million.

It's not like it never comes up in conversation. It does. I've even talked about a couple of unusual things I've seen, which should provide an opening. But no one I've talked to has ever reported anything truely mysterious.


56 posted on 02/17/2005 6:47:21 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl

ping


57 posted on 02/17/2005 6:53:02 AM PST by null and void (Psst. Mohammad was planted by the Mossad to oppress arabs. It's still working. Pass it on...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
My statement was perfectly accurate. UFO reports do not represent a single phenomenon. This is true even if some reports represent an unknown phenomenon.

If 20% of reports involve alien spaceships, angels, Viking Kitties, or whatever, that still means that the remaining 80% involve other phenomena, such as airplanes, and weather ballons, and bright stars and planets.

If some reports represent one phenomenon, and other reports represent a different phenomenon, and still other reports represent yet another phenomenon, then the reports do not represent a single phenomenon.

I'm not sure why this is such a difficult concept to grasp.

58 posted on 02/17/2005 7:11:33 AM PST by ScottFromSpokane (http://drunkengop.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion

I stand corrected and apologize

I guess I just get a bit aggravated by hearing over generalization by people who make assurances that "such and such" never happened.

It is not just on this subject, it's on any subject.

We live in a strange and wonderful world and there are many things in it that we cannot explain.

The natural and physical world does not live in a box that we define.


59 posted on 02/17/2005 7:20:22 AM PST by Leatherneck_MT (What are you? Lion or Lamb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ScottFromSpokane

"I'm not sure why this is such a difficult concept to grasp."

I stand corrected. I misunderstood what you meant. You make good sense.

I thought you were referring to a SPECIFIC phenomena, namely extraterrestrial sources for sightings, not one phenomenon versus multiple phenomena.


60 posted on 02/17/2005 7:55:36 AM PST by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson