Skip to comments.
Ron Paul - The National ID Trojan Horse
House Web Site ^
| 2-14-2005
| Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX)
Posted on 02/14/2005 9:43:53 AM PST by jmc813
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: Condor51
Then why does this bill require "Proof of the person's social security account number" for a _driver's_license_? I'm sure it doesn't have anything to do with your federally-mandated retirement plan...
To: kandb
42
posted on
02/14/2005 11:08:12 AM PST
by
OKSooner
To: inquest
There is much more to the law. #29 above just lists what is required to get such a card, what shall be printed on it, what databases it shall be linked to and who has access to that information. Go to http://www.thomas.loc.gov and look up the bill number there.
To: Condor51
yes, i use Thomas.gov all the time.
between this and the crud at sd legistlature i have been staying pretty well PO'd at both the Fed Reps and my State Reps.
seems it is the law abiding citizen who must constantly be burdaned with more and more laws, rules and regulations for a bunch of worthless congress numbskulls trying to pass the buck and cover their hineys for past (percieved?) mistakes. someone please tell me how this law would have prevented all the 9/11 hijackers from carrying out ther act? i don't see it.. i just see our personal freedoms and privacy going further down the tubes.
44
posted on
02/14/2005 11:10:52 AM PST
by
sdpatriot
("If I know the answer I'll tell you the answer, and if I don't, I'll just respond, cleverly." Rummy)
To: sdpatriot
Yes, I saw the 'linking of databases'. It's between the States, not Canada and Mexico as the article says. And if there already was a linked database in 2001, Mohamed Atta wouldn't have had 5(?) different DL's.
As to what SD is proposing, that has no correlation to this Bill.
45
posted on
02/14/2005 11:20:55 AM PST
by
Condor51
(May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Gen G Patton)
To: ctdonath2; Condor51
Thanks. Now I see that the portion you posted at #29 is the entire portion of the bill that's relevant to the thread.
By the way, Dr. Paul is correct that this information is to be shared with Mexico and Canada. Section 203(a) requires that "To be eligible to receive any grant or other type of financial assistance made available under this title, a State shall participate in the interstate compact regarding sharing of driver license data, known as the 'Driver License Agreement', in order to provide electronic access by a State to information contained in the motor vehicle databases of all other States."
This "Driver License Agreement", contrary to the impression contained in the bill, includes not only states of the USA but also any "territory of Canada or any state of the Republic of Mexico or the federal district of Mexico." Source
46
posted on
02/14/2005 11:21:56 AM PST
by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: jmc813
Bad idea! Repercussions are endless. Reminds a person of the unfolding of Revelations.
47
posted on
02/14/2005 11:28:51 AM PST
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: jmc813
48
posted on
02/14/2005 11:31:37 AM PST
by
agitator
(...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
To: sdpatriot
(2) Motor vehicle drivers' histories, including motor vehicle violations, suspensions, and points on licenses. In addition, it looks like the insurance companies have had their way with the senate on this. Can anyone come up with an actual "security" purpose for the above?
49
posted on
02/14/2005 11:32:06 AM PST
by
zeugma
(Come to the Dark Side...... We have cookies!)
To: inquest
Let me assure you that information IS shared. I got a normal speeding ticket near Ottawa Canada, and New York nearly pulled my license for it. (Ain't that sweet? NY punishing a US citizen for a traffic violation in another COUTNRY!)
To: inquest; Condor51
This "Driver License Agreement", contrary to the impression contained in the bill, includes not only states of the USA but also any "territory of Canada or any state of the Republic of Mexico or the federal district of Mexico." Thanks for posting that inquest. What say ye Condor51?
51
posted on
02/14/2005 11:35:48 AM PST
by
zeugma
(Come to the Dark Side...... We have cookies!)
To: zeugma
No problem. (your tagline cracked me up, btw)
52
posted on
02/14/2005 11:39:30 AM PST
by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: inquest
My oldest daughter came up with the tag. Her sense of humor is twisted similar to mine. In light of the fact that my annual shipment of finely ground, and slightly minty girlscouts arrived today, I'm going to modify it in their memory.
53
posted on
02/14/2005 11:46:07 AM PST
by
zeugma
(Come to the Dark Side...... We have cookies! (Made from the finest girlscouts!))
To: teancumspirit
As contemporary conservatives, a better descriptor for the beliefs of most of us is "Jeffersonian liberal." Jefferson and the founding fathers were 'liberal' in terms of granting freedom and independence to the populace. They did so because they, too feared government.
It is wise to fear government. The cost of our liberty is eternal vigilance to ensure they do not become totalitarian, as a greater man than I once stated. A National ID card, which is a defacto national database of the citizenry is another step in that direction.
It's a shame we allowed the Leftists to co-opt the term "liberal," which they did as part of their redefining what freedom is so that it mean government control.
54
posted on
02/14/2005 11:56:01 AM PST
by
Ghost of Philip Marlowe
(Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
To: Condor51
all he needed was one.
look, the Feds screwed up on Atta. mainly because of the Clinton era "wall" in place. that is a fact.
making new rules, regs, and laws that infringe on the privacy and freedoms of LAW ABIDING citizens is nothing but a cop out for the Reps and paying hommage to the allmighty 9/11 Committee.
as to the SD bill... i disagree. the SD HB 1209 is to make it possible for LE to have a data base on gun permit owners. before, if you forgot your permit, you had so many hours to bring it in to the local LE for proof. much like our 'proof of insurance' law.
but with this bill, that info will be in a LE data base connected with your DL. so if pulled over for a traffic violation and the LE runs a check on you DL it will show that you are a permit owner (gun owner). so when this Fed bill makes all that DL data available to all the states and to the Feds etc..... that makes it a connections between the two.
and it's dead wrong and unconstitutional.
55
posted on
02/14/2005 11:59:15 AM PST
by
sdpatriot
("If I know the answer I'll tell you the answer, and if I don't, I'll just respond, cleverly." Rummy)
To: jmc813
To: Mr. K
"computers run everything"
Nope, people run everything, computers just do what the people tell them.
57
posted on
02/14/2005 12:17:01 PM PST
by
dljordan
To: duk; Steven W.
Steven must be some kind of drive-by bomb thrower.
To: ctdonath2
Because besides citizens, only those aliens here legally can get a SS card, that's why. Illegals can't get a SS card, ergo they can't get a DL (or state ID).
59
posted on
02/14/2005 12:51:59 PM PST
by
Condor51
(May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Gen G Patton)
To: xrp
Yep, and I'm one of them.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson