Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Trade Deficit Hits All-Time High
www.forbes.com ^ | www.forbes.com

Posted on 02/12/2005 10:23:21 PM PST by soccer_linux_mozilla

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: durasell

If they stop buying our bonds, the trade deficit would fall, as the yuan woud appreciate against the dollar. That's the reason WHY China buys our bonds -- they need to do repatriate all the dollars they earn from exports to the US.


61 posted on 02/13/2005 2:03:57 PM PST by ChicagoHebrew (Hell exists, it is real. It's a quiet green meadow populated entirely by Arab goat herders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jb6
OK, if we take that approach YOU have to be registered with the government as well (Drivers license, Marriage license, Income taxes, Birth Certificate, etc.) so by your definition your rights can be restricted as well. This idea you are putting forth has been tried before but most of it ended when the Berlin wall fell

Oh, so in your view, a sociatal contract aka a corporation is to stand on the same level as a human being? And while you're cheerleading for this and for your right to move to China, why aren't you pushing for the same in China? Oh that's right, the key core competancy of China is slave labor and by defending your right to send to China you're defending your right to use slave labor or rather have it used on your behave. How nice.

62 posted on 02/13/2005 2:42:20 PM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Once-Ler
2004 was a record year for the sale of cars. Look out your window and count the SUVs

Yes, with zero financing and don't pay for it for 6 months, it's all credit. As for SUVs it's actually been a rather bad year. You're the one basing on hyperbole. Look out the window?

We have had a record in bankruptcies over the past 4 years with only one drop last year (.8% in personnel filings) and have hit the record in consumer debt, much of which will never be paid off. Meanwhile business bankruptcies are up some 4%

Here

Data compiled by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts show that the number of bankruptcy filings (dominated by personal filings) dropped by about 1 percent during the 12 months that ended June 30, 2004, from 1.65 million to 1.63 million. The decline marked the first time since 2000 that there were fewer bankruptcies filed than in the previous 12 months. The total number of non-business bankruptcy filings for the 12-month period ending June 30, 2004 was 1,599,986, down 0.8 percent from the 1,613,097 cases filed during the 12-month period ending June 30, 2003. Business filings during the same period dropped to 35,739, down 3.9 percent form 37, 182 in the previous 12 months. But Chapter 11 (business reorganization) filings rose 4.2 percent, from 10,602 in 2003 to 11,048 as of June 30, 2004. Chapter 7 (liquidation) cases rose .10 percent to 1.16 million. The number of public companies filing for Chapter 11 protection during the same period fell by about half, from 99 to 51. The largest corporate filing in the period was by Mirant Corp., an energy producer and supplier, which listed $19.4 billion in assets. (This was the only company to file bankruptcy during the past year that ranks in the top 50 bankruptcies since 1970). The second-largest public filing was made by insurer Trenwick Group, which listed $5.3 billion in assets. A major accounting and consulting firm, Pricewaterhouse Coopers, predicts that just 110 companies will file for bankruptcy protection in calendar year 2004, which would continue a decline in the bankruptcy rate. In 2003, 133 companies filed, which itself was a decrease of nearly half from 2001, when a record 257 companies filed. This decrease has been attributed to more favorable borrowing rates, continued general economic improvement, and improved corporate governance practices. Pricewaterhouse Coopers also believes that the size of companies involved in bankruptcies will fall in 2004. The major rating agencies have reported that bond default rates this year have been at their lowest since 1999.

One out of every 73 U.S. households filed for bankruptcy in the calendar year 2003, a record high (despite historically low interest rates). This compares with one bankruptcy filing for every 144 households in 1993, according to the American Bankruptcy Institute. For the calendar year 2003, a record 1.6 million bankruptcy cases were filed, up 5.2 percent from calendar year 2002 and nearly doubling the 812,898 filings in 1993. This growth is consistent with the growth in household debt, which reached $8.9 billion last year relative to disposable income. Consumer bankruptcies were filed during 2003 at a rate of 185 per hour, according to the American Bankruptcy Institute. Utah had the distinction of having the highest per-household bankruptcy rate -- one out of every 47 -- followed closely by Tennessee, Georgia, Nevada and Alabama. Alaska had the lowest rate in 2003 -- just one filing for every 189 households, followed by Vermont, North Dakota and New Hampshire.

63 posted on 02/13/2005 2:49:54 PM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jb6
"Oh, so in your view, a sociatal contract aka a corporation is to stand on the same level as a human being?"

A corporation is a group of people organized to do business. If they wish to move to Pango Pango and make popsicles that is their business.

"And while you're cheerleading for this and for your right to move to China, why aren't you pushing for the same in China?"

That would be for the people in China to decide.

"Oh that's right, the key core competancy of China is slave labor and by defending your right to send to China you're defending your right to use slave labor or rather have it used on your behave(sic)."

The term slave labor is an interesting choice, could you define it as used in this context?

64 posted on 02/13/2005 3:33:33 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
"First, lets keep to the rest of my quote: I said in international trade. America, up until post WW2, had very strong protectionist measures and all they accomplished was making the US into an economic power house."

Actually no, we didn't become a true economic powerhouse until World War TWO. Just prior to that in the thirties were had fallen into the deepest Depression to date mainly due to Hoover trying to stop a recession by introducing even harsher protectionist policies. Then along came FDR and he took us deeper into socialism with his Keynesian Policies.

What got us out of the Depression was the war and all the war goods we sold to Europe. Socialism took a heavy toll from the forties till the eighties then Keynesian Policies were thrown over for Hayek's ideas and we have been rolling ever since.

65 posted on 02/13/2005 3:46:25 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Once-Ler
A lot of the SUV purchases have been spurred on by a $25,000 tax break given by the Fed, aka Joe Sixpack and his taxes.
66 posted on 02/13/2005 3:59:30 PM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg; A. Pole; ninenot; neutrino

Not quite, Hoover did very little to actually try to ease the Depression believing the market will correct itself. Further, in 1929 the Great Depression was caused by massive personnel debt (record for the time), run away investement bubbles (similiar to the .com bubble but all industry wide) and several other projects, like over production that drove prices down below the economic cost of production. A perfect storm. The British and French empires were already ruined by free trade at that point. England, the world's premier industrial power started to allow outsourcing in the late 1860s and by the 1910s had to buy ammunition and weapons from us to fight against a nation that didn't even exist in the 1860s.


67 posted on 02/13/2005 4:02:59 PM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: jb6
Data compiled by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts show that the number of bankruptcy filings (dominated by personal filings) dropped by about 1 percent during the 12 months that ended June 30, 2004, from 1.65 million to 1.63 million. The decline marked the first time since 2000 that there were fewer bankruptcies filed than in the previous 12 months. The total number of non-business bankruptcy filings for the 12-month period ending June 30, 2004 was 1,599,986, down 0.8 percent from the 1,613,097 cases filed during the 12-month period ending June 30, 2003. Business filings during the same period dropped to 35,739, down 3.9 percent form 37, 182 in the previous 12 months....

The number of public companies filing for Chapter 11 protection during the same period fell by about half, from 99 to 51. The largest corporate filing in the period was by Mirant Corp., an energy producer and supplier, which listed $19.4 billion in assets. (This was the only company to file bankruptcy during the past year that ranks in the top 50 bankruptcies since 1970). The second-largest public filing was made by insurer Trenwick Group, which listed $5.3 billion in assets. A major accounting and consulting firm, Pricewaterhouse Coopers, predicts that just 110 companies will file for bankruptcy protection in calendar year 2004, which would continue a decline in the bankruptcy rate. In 2003, 133 companies filed, which itself was a decrease of nearly half from 2001, when a record 257 companies filed. This decrease has been attributed to more favorable borrowing rates, continued general economic improvement, and improved corporate governance practices. Pricewaterhouse Coopers also believes that the size of companies involved in bankruptcies will fall in 2004. The major rating agencies have reported that bond default rates this year have been at their lowest since 1999

Because it deserves repeating. That is great news! Thank you so much for pointing it out. Everywhere I look the economy is getting better, after our mild recession and the horrible attack on 9-11. The terrorists hoped they could kill our markets and they failed. Next year the economy will be even better, much to dissatisfaction of the terrorist and the Malkinbots.

68 posted on 02/13/2005 4:07:01 PM PST by Once-Ler (Beating a dead horse for NeoCon America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: jb6
A lot of the SUV purchases have been spurred on by a $25,000 tax break given by the Fed, aka Joe Sixpack and his taxes.

Tax breaks are useless unless you have the money to buy first. Leave it to the isolationist to find fault with tax cuts.

69 posted on 02/13/2005 4:08:55 PM PST by Once-Ler (Beating a dead horse for NeoCon America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: jb6
"Further, in 1929 the Great Depression was caused by massive personnel debt"

No that was the stock market crash which was during the Recession of that period. The Depression came about when government repeatedly tried to fix the recession with tariffs and protectionist policies. Hoover was real big on tariffs and wanted a strengthing of the 1922 Tariff act. In fact it was part of his election platform to get more tarrifs.

70 posted on 02/13/2005 4:23:03 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Once-Ler
That's not a tax cut, that's a tax credit, figure out the difference. That's tax monies given back to a specific group after they are taken from other groups.

And as far as calling us Isolationists that's a typical ad hon-um attack of the free traitors. None of us are isolationists. All of us believe in free trade on a nation by nation basis instead of socialist, leftist, marxist world organizations and across the board deals that destroy national sovereignty by denying a nation the right to control its economics and borders. But I'm sure you knew that and made the attack all the same.

71 posted on 02/13/2005 4:25:59 PM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
Main Causes of the Great Depression

Paul Alexander Gusmorino 3rd : May 13, 1996

The Great Depression was the worst economic slump ever in U.S. history, and one which spread to virtually all of the industrialized world. The depression began in late 1929 and lasted for about a decade. Many factors played a role in bringing about the depression; however, the main cause for the Great Depression was the combination of the greatly unequal distribution of wealth throughout the 1920's, and the extensive stock market speculation that took place during the latter part that same decade. The maldistribution of wealth in the 1920's existed on many levels. Money was distributed disparately between the rich and the middle-class, between industry and agriculture within the United States, and between the U.S. and Europe. This imbalance of wealth created an unstable economy. The excessive speculation in the late 1920's kept the stock market artificially high, but eventually lead to large market crashes. These market crashes, combined with the maldistribution of wealth, caused the American economy to capsize.

72 posted on 02/13/2005 4:35:21 PM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
OR


Causes and Cures


Introduction

It should be noted that all of the cures have been tried and while we seem to be free of Depressions, it's not clear that business cycles have been eliminated.

Causes

The Stock Market Crash
The Stock Market Crash in Octoberof 1929 is often cited as the beginning of the Great Depression, but didit actually cause it?  The answer is no.  First, the stock price for a particular company merely reflects current information about the future income stream of that company.  Thus, it is a change in available information that changes the stock price.  When the Fed began to raise interest rates in early 1929, this began the tumble.

However, a stock market crash could cause people to increase their liquidity preference which might lead them to hoard money.

Hoarding Money
People hoard money because they have a liquidity preference.  I.e., people want to have their assets in a readily convertible form, such as money.  There are several misconceptions about hoarding money.  First hoarding is not the same thing as saving. If I put my money into a savings account, that money is lent out to someone else who then spends it.  Second, hoarding, by itself, cannot cause a recession or depression.  As long as prices and wages drop instantly to reflect the lower amount of money in the economy, then hoarding causes no problems.  Indeed, hoarding can even be seen as beneficial to those who don't hoard, since their money will be able to buy more goods as a result of the lower prices.

If a country has a gold standard, then hoarding money can make the money supply drop dramatically since a gold standard makes the quantity of money difficult for the government to control.

The Gold Standard
At the time of the Great Depression,America had a 100% gold standard for its money.  This meant that allcash was backed by a government promise to redeem it in a specific amount of gold (at the time, one ounce of gold was redeemable for twenty dollars). Because the amount of money circulating in the economy is wholly dependent on the amount of gold available, the money supply is very rigid.  If people start to hoard money (see above) the money supply can drop drastically.  As noted in the previous section on hoarding, this is not a problem as long as prices and wages drop instantly to reflect the lower amount of money circulating.
The Smoot-Hawley Tariff
The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act was passed in June of 1930.  Since this occurred after the onset of the Depression, it's hard to see how it could have caused it.  However, since the real effect of the increased tariffs was to increase prices and increase price rigidity, it is easy to see how the Act could have exacerbated the Depression.  Enacting the tariff was exactly the wrong thing to do and about 1,000 economists signed a petition begging Congress not to pass it.
The Federal Reserve Board
The Fed was ostensibly created to prevent bank panics and Depressions.  Is it possible that the Fedwas actually responsible for the Depression?  The answer is a qualified no.  The Fed took several actions that, in retrospect, were quite bad.  The first thing it did was to inflate the money supply by about 60% during the 1920's.  If the Fed had been a little more careful in expanding the money supply, it might have prevented the artificial Stock market boom and subsequent crash.  Second, there are indications that the economy was starting to cool off on its own in early 1929, thus making the interest rate hike in TBD completely unnecessary and avoiding the subsequentcrash.  The third mistake the Fed made was in early 1931.  The Fed raised interest rates, exactly the wrong thing to do during a contraction. Ironically, the country's gold stock was increasing at this point all on its own, so doing nothing would have increased the money supply and helped the recovery.

But even with all that bungling, it is not clear that we can lay responsibility for the Great Depression at the feet of the Fed.

Malinvestment
"Malinvestment" is a term coined by the Austrian school of economics to sum up their explanation of the causes of business cycles.  According to this theory, all business cycles are caused by government intervention in the market.  Specifically, the central bank (the Fed in the case of the U.S.) artificially lowers the interest rate, flooding the economy with money.  This money is then invested in capital goods that would not be justified at a market level of interest rates.  The low interest rate cannot be sustained forever without an increase in inflation, so the Fed inevitably has to raise interest rates.  When this happens, the investments that were "justified" under a lower interest rate must be liquidated.  Any prevention of this liquidation by further government intervention will simply prolong the re-adjustment and thus exacerbate the recovery.  This view is held by very few economists.
Sticky Prices/Sticky Wages
Prices and wages change in accordance to the scarcity of goods and labor relative to the amount of money that is available to buy them.  For example, if the Federal Reserve Boardincreases the nation's money supply, then prices and wages will tend togo up, reflecting the fact that more money is chasing the same amount of goods and labor.  When the Fed does too much of this, it is called inflation.  But what happens if the money supply goes down relative to the amount of goods and labor?  Eventually, the price of goods and labor will go down as well in the long run.  But in the short run, prices and wages can "stick" at a higher level than the market clearing price or wage.  When this happens, people buy less and employers hire less, thus causing cut backs in production and employment.  There are a number of reasons why prices and wages might stick.  One reason is referred to as "menu costs," meaning that it often costs money to change a price.  A good example is a restaurant that has to print new menus every time the prices change.
Monetary Misperceptions
Under Construction
Federal Farm Bureau
Under Construction
Real Business Cycles Theory
Under Construction
 

Cures

FDR's New Deal
Under Construction
Inflating the money supply
Under Construction
Deficit Spending
Under Construction
Doing Nothing

Amazingly, doing nothing often seems to be the correct response.  The Depressions of 1907 and 1920 were both over within a year, even though the Federal government did virtually nothing in response.
 
 

Conclusion

Under Construction

73 posted on 02/13/2005 4:35:36 PM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
pictures --->

Causes of the Great Depression

Chapter 25: Dust Bowl, Scottsboro boys, Jacob Lawrence, Chicanos, Nisei, Middletown, soap operas, Frank Capra, Popular Front, Southern Tenant Farmers Union, James Agee, "The Ordeal of Herbert Hoover."

1. False Prosperity

2. Speculation

3. Stock Market Crash

4. Banking Crisis

5. Unemployment

6. Trade Collapse

7. Republican Policy

Great Depression links
revised 3/30/02 | Class Page

74 posted on 02/13/2005 4:38:04 PM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: jb6
That's tax monies given back to a specific group after they are taken from other groups.

IOW tax money is given back to the tax payer.

And as far as calling us Isolationists that's a typical ad hon-um attack of the free traitors.

So I'm a free TRAITOR, but the isolationist shoe don't fit you? Get out of my face you LOSER. Does that shoe fit?

All of us believe in free trade on a nation by nation basis instead of socialist, leftist, marxist world organizations and across the board deals that destroy national sovereignty by denying a nation the right to control its economics and borders.

The fact that you think Dubya, me and my fellow freepers want to destroy America reflects your level of intellegence.

75 posted on 02/13/2005 4:39:54 PM PST by Once-Ler (Beating a dead horse for NeoCon America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: jb6
"Not quite, Hoover did very little to actually try to ease the Depression believing the market will correct itself...

In 1930, Congress passed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff. This measure tagged a sixty percent surcharge onto imported goods. Hoover signed the bill. In response to Smoot-Hawley, many countries levied tariffs on American goods. The market tumbled lower. Jobs vanished, and bread lines got longer.

76 posted on 02/13/2005 4:40:13 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

Great Depression

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The Great Depression was a global economic slump that began in 1929 and bottomed in 1933. However, most of the remainder of the 1930s was spent recovering from the contraction, and it would be well after World War II when such indicators as industrial production, share prices and global GDP surpassed their 1929 peaks. The Great Depression can refer to the economic event, but it can also refer to the cultural period, often called simply "The Depression", and to the political response to the economic events.

The "Great Depression" is so named because it is by far the largest sustained decline in industrial production and productivity from the century and a half where economic records have been kept with any regularity, and it reached virtually the entire industrialized world and their trading partners in peripheral nations. It led to massive bank failures, high unemployment, as well as dramatic drops in GDP, industrial production, share prices and virtually every other measure of economic growth.

's Migrant Mother depicts destitute pea pickers in California, centering on , a mother of seven children, age thirty-two, in ,  .
Enlarge
Dorothea Lange's Migrant Mother depicts destitute pea pickers in California, centering on Florence Owens Thompson, a mother of seven children, age thirty-two, in Nipomo, California, March 1936.
Contents

Causes of the Great Depression

Economists, historians, and political scientists have posed several theories for the cause, or causes, of the Great Depression with surprisingly little consensus. It remains one of the most studied events of history to economic historians. Major theories that have been proposed include the stock market crash of 1929, collapse of the gold standard, collapse of international trade, federal reserve policy, and many other influences.

The Stock Market Crash of 1929 as a trigger

In the popular imagination the Great Depression was started by the "Crash of 1929". On October 24, 1929 (the day also known as the Black Thursday), share prices on Wall Street collapsed catastrophically, setting off a chain of bankruptcies and defaults that quickly spread overseas. The events in the United States were the final shock in a worldwide depression, which put hundreds of millions out of work across the capitalist world throughout the 1930s. In truth economic instability had been growing for some time, however, the impact of the Crash of '29 was notable because the Wall Street was where the wealthy of Europe had increasingly banked their gains. The Crash would dramatically reduce the total percentage of wealth held by the very top of the economic scale, and would create financial difficulties for many of them.

The market crash in the U.S. was the final straw for the already shaky world economy. There had been a series of financial crisis points through the 1920's including Germany suffering from hyperinflation, and turbulence associated with Britain attempting to re-establish the gold standard on a pre-war price basis. Many of the Allied victors of World War I were having serious problems paying off huge war debts, which had lead to loan programs from the United States. In the late 1920s, the U.S. economy at first seemed immune to the mounting troubles, running a huge balance of trade surplus, but in 1930, what seemed like a cyclical down turn in the economy turned into a massive economic crisis.

One theory according to contemporary economists such as Peter Temin, as well as observers at the time such as John Maynard Keynes, is that international finance never recovered from the strains of World War I. After the world war there had been a rapid increase in industrialization, as well as sharp cuts in armaments by the major powers, which caused a dramatic increase in productive capacity, particularly outside Europe, without a corresponding increase in sustained demand. Fixed exchange rates and free convertibility gave way to a compromised gold standard that lacked the stability to rebuild world trade. According to this view, the major problem was that the world financial system did not have the ability to increase aggregate demand as fast as supply was increasing. There was an "over investment" in the late 1920's, which lead to a financial bubble that finally came crashing down into a vicious circle of deflation.

In 1929 the world's most prosperous nation was the United States. But despite the confidence in the United States and the apparent economic well-being in other countries, the world economy was in an unhealthy state. One by one, the pillars of the prewar economic system—multilateral trade, the gold standard, and the interchangeability of currencies—began to crumble.

The UK had returned to the gold standard in 1925 but had spent the previous five years managing the gold price down to its pre-war level. This forced a sharp deflation across the economy of the UK and the many other nations that used the Pound Sterling as their national unit of account.

The U.S. economy had been showing some signs of distress for months before October 1929. Commodity prices had been falling worldwide since 1926, reducing the capacity of exporters in the peripheral, undeveloped economies of Latin America, Asia, and Africa to buy products from the core industrial countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom. Business inventories were three times as large as they had been a year before (an indication that the public was not buying products as rapidly as in the past); and other indicators of economic health—freight carloads, industrial production, wholesale prices—were slipping downward.

A maldistribution of purchasing power

Another theory holds that the fundamental maldistribution of purchasing power, the greatly unequal distribution of wealth throughout the 1920s, caused the Great Depression. According to this view wages increased at a rate that was a fraction of the rate at which productivity increased. As production costs fell quickly, wages rose slowly, and prices remained constant, the bulk benefit of the increased productivity went into profits. As industrial and agricultural production increased, the proportion of the profits going to farmers, factory workers, and other potential consumers was far too small to create a market for goods that they were producing. Even in 1929, after nearly a decade of economic growth, more than half the families in America lived on the edge or below the subsistence level—too poor to share in the great consumer boom of the 1920s, too poor to buy the cars and houses and other goods the industrial economy was producing, too poor in many cases to buy even the adequate food and shelter for themselves. As long as corporations had continued to expand their capital facilities (their factories, warehouses, heavy equipment, and other investments), the economy had flourished. Under pressure from the Coolidge administration and the business, the Federal Reserve Board kept the rediscount rate low, encouraging excessive investment. By the end of the 1920s, however, capital investments had created more plant space than could be profitably used, and factories were producing more goods than consumers could purchase.

An increase in margin buying, the act of borrowing money from lenders in order to buy stocks, helped many people invest in the roaring stock market of the 1920s. When the stock market began to decline, the lenders panicked and demanded their money back. This increased the sales of stocks to pay off the loans, but many people remained in debt and the lenders could not get their money back.

The Federal Reserve and the Money Supply

Another theory of the Great Depression, forwarded most notably by economists Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz, involves the quantity theory of money. According to this theory, most of the depression's severity was caused by poor decision-making at the Federal Reserve.

For the first four years of the Depression the Federal Reserve Board contracted the money supply at a time when Friedman says they should have been expanding it. Note Friedman and Schwartz:

"From the cyclical peak in August 1929 to a cyclical trough in March 1933, the stock of money fell by over a third."

The result was what Friedman calls the "Great Contraction" — a period of falling income, prices, and employment caused by the choking effects of a restricted money supply. A corrollary of this theory rejects the Gold Standard theory of the depression. It is a notable development because it implies that the depression's severity was caused by the Federal Reserve's mismangement of the economy, not the absence of management. This theory is popular among the Monetarist school of economics. Many give credence to Friedman's theory because the theory has robustly explained most subsequent U.S. recessions and inflations.

A lack of diversification

Another theory attributes the Depression to a serious lack of diversification in the American economy of the 1920s. Prosperity had been excessively dependent on a few basic industries, notably construction and automobiles; in the late 1920s, those industries began to decline. Between 1926 and 1929, expenditures on construction fell from $11 billion to under $9 billion. Automobile sales began to decline somewhat later, but in the first nine months of 1929 they declined by more than one third. Once these two crucial industries began to weaken, there was not enough strength in the other sectors of the economy to take up the slack. Even while the automotive industry was thriving in the 1920s, some industries, agriculture in particular, were declining steadily. While the Ford Motor Company was reporting record assets, farm prices plummeted, and the price of food fell precipitously.

Postwar deflationary pressures

The Gold Standard theory of the Depression attributes it to postwar deflationary policies. During World War I many European nations abandoned the gold standard, forced by the enormous costs of the war. This resulted in inflation, because it was not matched with rationing and other forms of forced savings. The view of economic orthodoxy at the time was that the quantity of money determined inflation, and therefore the cure to inflation was to reduce the amount of circulating medium. Because of the huge reparations that Germany had to pay France, Germany began a credit fueled period of growth, in order to export, to sell enough abroad to gain gold to pay back reparations. The United States, as the world's gold sink, loaned money to Germany to industrialize, which was then the basis for Germany paying back France, and France paying back loans to the United Kingdom and United States. This arrangement was codified in the Dawes Plan.

This had a number of economic consequences in its own right, however what is of particular relevance is that following the war most nations returned to the gold standard at the pre-war gold price, in part, because those who had loaned in nominal amounts hoped to recovery the same value in gold that they had lent, and in part because the prevailing opinion at the time was that deflation was not a danger, while inflation, and particularly the hyper-inflation experienced by Weimar Germany were unbearable dangers. Monetary policy was in effect put into a deflationary setting that would over the next decade slowly grind away at the health of many European economies. While the Banking Act of 1925 created currency countrols and exchange restrictions, it set the new price of the Pound Sterling at parity with the pre-war price. At the time this was criticized by Keynes and others, who argued that in so doing, they were forcing a revaluation of wages without any tendency to equilibrium. Keynes criticism of Churchill's form of the return to the gold standard implicitly compared it to the consequences of the Versailles treaty.

Deflation's impact is particularly hard on sectors of the economy that are in debt, or that use regular loans to finance activity, such as agriculture. Deflation erodes the price of commodities while increasing the real value of debt.

But the deflationary pressures — the industrialization of the United States, the spread of internal combustion, the return to gold, the rapid expansion of German productive capacity — do not account for the severity of the drop in business after 1930 under most models.

The credit structure

Farmers, already deeply in debt, saw farm prices plummet in the late 1920s, their implicit real interest rates on loans skyrocket; their land was already mortgaged, and crop prices were too low to allow them to pay off what they owed. Small banks, especially those tied to the agricultural economy, were in constant crisis in the 1920s as their customers defaulted on loans due to the sudden rise in real interest rates; there was a steady stream of failures among these smaller banks throughout the decade.

Although most American bankers in this era were staunchly conservative, some of the nation's largest banks were failing to maintain adequate reserves and were investing recklessly in the stock market or making unwise loans. In other words, the banking system was not well prepared to absorb the shock of a major recession. The banking system as a whole, moreover, was only very loosely regulated by the Federal Reserve System at this time.

The breakdown of international trade

Another factor contributing to the Great Depression was America's position in international trade. Protectionist impulses would drive nations to protect domestic production against competition from foreign imports by erecting high tariff walls. The Hawley-Smoot Tariff Act of June 1930 raised U.S. tariffs to unprecedented levels and ignited a worldwide tariff war with other countries adopting retaliatory trade restrictions of their own. Smoot-Hawley practically closed U.S. borders and, with retaliatory tariffs from U.S. trading partners, caused the immediate collapse of the most important export industry, American agriculture.

One theory posits that the Smoot-Hawley tariff's negative effects on agriculture was especially harmful because it caused farmers to default on their loans. This event may have worsened or even caused the ensuing bank runs in the midwest and west that caused the collapse of the banking system.

Prior to the Great Depression, a petition signed by over 1000 economists was presented to the U.S. government warning that the Hawley-Smoot Tariff Act would bring disastrous economic repercussions, however, this did not stop the act from being signed into law.

Beginning late in the 1920s, European demand for U.S. goods began to decline. That was partly because European industry and agriculture were becoming more productive, and partly because some European nations (most notably Weimar Germany) were suffering serious financial crises and could not afford to buy goods overseas. However, the central issue causing the destabilization of the European economy in the late 1920s was the international debt structure that had emerged in the aftermath of World War I.

When the war came to an end in 1918, all European nations that had been allied with the United States owed large sums of money to American banks, sums much too large to be repaid out of their shattered treasuries. This is one reason why the Allies had insisted (to the consternation of the perhaps historically vindicated Woodrow Wilson) on demanding reparation payments from Germany and Austria. Reparations, they believed, would provide them with a way to pay off their own debts. But Germany and Austria were themselves in deep economic trouble after the war; they were no more able to pay the reparations than the Allies were able to pay their debts.

The debtor nations put strong pressure on the United States in the 1920s to forgive the debts, or at least reduce them. The American government refused. Instead, U.S. banks began making large loans to the nations of Europe. Thus debts (and reparations) were being paid only by augmenting old debts and piling up new ones. In the late 1920s, and particularly after the American economy began to weaken after 1929, the European nations found it much more difficult to borrow money from the United States. At the same time, high U.S. tariffs were making it much more difficult for them to sell their goods in U.S. markets. Without any source of revenues from foreign exchange with which to repay their loans, they began to default.

The high tariff walls critically impeded the payment of war debts. As a result of high U.S. tariffs, only a sort of cycle kept the reparations and war-debt payments going. During the 1920s the former allies paid the war-debt installments to the United States chiefly with funds obtained from German reparations payments, and Germany was able to make those payments only because of large private loans from the United States and Britain. Similarly, U.S. investments abroad provided the dollars, which alone made it possible for foreign nations to buy U.S. exports.

By 1931 the world was reeling from the worst depression of all time, and the entire structure of reparations and war debts collapsed.

In the scramble for liquidity that followed the Great Crash, funds flowed back from Europe to America and Europe's fragile economies crumbled.

Responses

This family, the Wares, squatted on , ,  in 1930 because of the Great Depression.
This family, the Wares, squatted on Terminal Island, California, United States in 1930 because of the Great Depression.

The Wall Street crash had ushered in a world-wide financial crisis. In the United States between 1929 and 1933 unemployment soared from approximately 3 percent to 25 percent, while manufacturing output declined by one-third. Governments worldwide sought economic recovery by adopting restrictive autarkic policies (high tariffs, import quotas, and barter agreements) and by experimenting with new plans for their internal economies.

The economic crises due to the depression were a terrible epidemic throughout the United States and many parts of the world. Consumers reduced their purchases of luxury cars, clothes, and many businesses cut production. Big businesses such as General Motors saw their sales drop by 50% in the late 1920s and the early 1930s. This caused businesses to lay off thousands of workers.

When the farm prices fell, small farmers went bankrupt and lost their land. By June of 1932, the American economy had fallen by about 55% of the work force. The Government tried to restore prosperity by spending on welfare and public works.

After the stock market collapse, the New York banks became frightened and called in their loans to Germany and Austria. However, without the American money, Germans had to stop paying reparations to France and Britain. Of course, this was a chain reaction and they could not repay their war loans to America. Therefore, the depression had spread to Europe. All governments were forced to cancel both reparations payments and war loans.

The United States government tried to protect domestic industries from foreign competition by imposing the highest import duty in American history. In retaliation, other countries raised their tariffs on imports of American goods. As a result, global industrial production declined by 36% between 1929 and 1932, while world trade dropped by a breathtaking 62%.

In 1932, the United States had elected President Franklin D. Roosevelt. He proposed the "New Deal", a platform of government programs to stimulate and revitalize the economy. The British and French governments also intervened in their economies and escaped the worst of the depression. Moreover, the Soviet Union put in the five-year plans.

Observers throughout the world saw in the massive program of economic planning and state ownership of the Soviet Union what appeared to be a depression-proof economic system and a solution to the crisis in capitalism.

In Germany unemployment increased drastically, fueling widespread disillusionment and anger. The institutions of the Weimar Republic, which had already been standing on shaky ground, started cracking in the years from 1930 to 1932, while Chancellor and finance expert Heinrich Brüning was trying to fix the economy by drastically cutting state spending. At the time, the NSDAP gained much popularity, winning the two general elections in 1932, which eventually led to the appointment of Adolf Hitler as Chancellor on January 30, 1933. (See Weimar Republic for details.) In Nazi Germany economic recovery was pursued through rearmament, conscription, and public works programs. In Mussolini's Italy the economic controls of his corporate state were tightened.

In the United Kingdom, the Labour government of Ramsay MacDonald, and later the Conservative-dominated "National Government" responded to the depression by imposing tariffs on all imports except those of the British Empire (which arguably worsened the global situation), by cutting public spending, and by abandoning the Gold Standard which reduced the cost of British exports. (see Great Depression in the United Kingdom).

In the United States, President Herbert Hoover made efforts to control the situation. However, hindsight shows that at first, he gravely underestimated the severity of the crisis, (even announcing to U.S. Congress on December 3, 1929 that the worst effects of the recent stock market crash were behind them and that the U.S. public had regained faith in the economy). Having realized his mistake, Hoover went before Congress again on December 2, 1930 to ask for a $150 million public works program to help generate jobs. However, one of the major problems was that with deflation, the currency that you kept in your pocket could buy more goods as prices went down. The other was that there had been no federal oversight of the stock market or other investment markets, and with the collapse, many stock and investment schemes were found to be either insolvent, or outright frauds. Unfortunately, many banks had invested in these schemes, and this may have precipitated a collapse of the banking system in 1932; Milton Friedman's monetary theories suggest that the inexperience of the newly-created Federal Reserve in managing the money supply exacerbated the problem. With the banking system in shambles, and people holding on to whatever currency that they had, there was minimal cash available for any activities that would cause positive change.

The response of the Hoover administration helped little; instead of increasing the money supply, the Hoover administration did the exact opposite and raised interest rates, falsely believing that inflation was the real danger. Many in the Hoover administration believed that as wages fell, the cost of production would drop, and as a result, production would pick up again, and the depression would be self-correcting. Nobody at that time understood the effects of a calamitous drop in the money supply. For this reason, they saw no need for the government to intervene in the economy, a policy which proved disastrous.

Like their counterparts abroad, many Americans were disillusioned with their system of government, believing that Hoover's policies had driven the country to ruin. (Shantytowns populated by unemployed people at the time were often dubbed Hoovervilles to highlight the President's fading popularity). During this period, several alternative and fringe political movements saw a considerable increase in membership. In particular, a number of high-profile figures embraced the ideals of Communism, although this would subsequently be used against them during the Red Scare of the 1950s. Radio speakers such as Father Charles Coughlin saw their listening audiences swell into the millions, as they sought for (and often found) easy scapegoats to blame the country's woes upon.

Upon accepting Democratic nomination for president (July 2, 1932), Roosevelt promised "a new deal for the American people", a phrase that has endured as a label for his administration and its many domestic achievements.

Effects of Great Depression on Asia

Asia was also hit by the Great Depression due to its dependence on trade of rubber and tin with the West. Being the biggest buyers of rubber and tin (for the automobile industry), trade sharply fell for Asia after America and Europe bought less of these goods. Companies in Asia had much less profit than before and had to dismiss some workers.

Many workers were dismissed so as to keep the company going and the rest had their pay reduced. Many people had to depend on the aid of their friends or relatives to find a job.

Life during the Depression

In the so-called Dust Bowl, a massive area of the great plains consisting mainly of Kansas, Oklahoma, and parts of Texas, people found themselves unable to make a living. On top of the economic crisis, the earth withered and blew away in a series of massive dust storms. For a farming people this was disastrous, and these migrants were led westward by advertisements for work put out by agribusiness in western states such as California. The migrants came to be called Okies, Arkies, and other derogatory names as they flooded the labor supply of the agricultural fields, driving down wages and increasing competition for jobs in a place that couldn't afford it. This story was dramatized in the famous novels The Grapes of Wrath and Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck.

International

Many other nations, although not all, experienced a similar decline, though the severity and timing differed from country to country. For example, Britain hit its trough in the third quarter of 1932, while France did not reach its low point until April of 1937.

End of the Great Depression

For details, see the main New Deal article.

It was not until the U.S. entered World War II that Roosevelt's ideas for massive public expenditures and deficit spending truly began to bear fruit. Roosevelt's administration, of course, had little choice but to increase expenditures, given the war effort. Even given the special circumstances of war mobilization, New Deal policies seemed to work exactly as predicted, winning over many Republicans, who had been the New Deal's greatest opponents. When the Great Depression was brought to an end by the Second World War, it was obvious that the turnaround had been caused primarily by the reinforcement of business through government expenditure.

New Deal programs sought to stimulate demand and provide work and relief for the impoverished through increased government spending: the theories behind the New Deal were backed up later by the writings of British economist John Maynard Keynes. In 1929 federal expenditures constituted only 3 percent of the GDP. Between 1933 and 1939, federal expenditure tripled, and Roosevelt's critics accused him of turning America into a socialist state, or even Stalinist state. The primary purpose of the New Deal was to prevent the economy and banking system from going into free fall, to provide effective relief until larger economic forces would end the slump, and to prevent those factors which had exacerbated the slump. The New Deal was both a program of national recovery and of reform. An interesting insight into what motivated Roosevelt came from the transition from the Hoover administration — both men agreed that it was a global maladjustment of prices, debts and production that was causing the slump. The disagreement came over whether the US government should act first to try and negotiate an end to the root causes internationally, which was Hoover's view, or act for domestic recovery and reform until the international situation could be resolved, which was FDR's view.

The New Deal was rooted in new ideas, but also in economic orthodoxy of balanced budgets, and restraint of federal power, it was bigger and broader government than ever before, but it was not as big as government would later become: spending on the New Deal was far smaller than on the war effort. In short, federal expenditures went from 3 percent of the GDP in 1929 to about a third in 1945. The big surprise was just how productive America became: spending financially cured the depression. Between 1939 and 1944 (the peak of wartime production), the nation's output more than doubled. Consequently, unemployment plummeted—from 19.0 percent in 1938 to 1.2 percent in 1944 as the labor force grew by ten million. The war economy was not so much a triumph of free enterprise as the result of government/business sectionalism, of the Federal government bankrolling business. It was World War II which finally provided the United States Federal Government with the ability to inject enough demand stimulus to end the Depresion, and resolve the global monetary crisis by the imposition of the Bretton Woods system.

The Great Depression was not the longest depression on record, that title being held by the Long Depression of the late nineteenth century, nor was it the sharpest contraction, the one after the First World War being a deeper drop. It has commonly been described as the "deepest" depression in history because it represented the greatest fall from the general trendline of growth.

Films

See also

External links




77 posted on 02/13/2005 4:41:01 PM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Once-Ler
Get out of my face you LOSER. Does that shoe fit?

No it fits your mindset that's obvious. Try debating on the issue of fair trade, I'm waiting. Your bunch launches into we've got a right to do anything we want, no you don't, corporations are an agreement between a group of people and the government. They don't just appear.

The fact that you think Dubya, me and my fellow freepers want to destroy America reflects your level of intellegence.

Don't drag Dubya into this, you guys with the open borders insanity have been at it for a long time.

78 posted on 02/13/2005 4:48:34 PM PST by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah

You think Chins can afford to go to war with its biggest customer?


79 posted on 02/13/2005 4:51:29 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jb6

The Great Depression
An International Disaster of Perverse Economic Policies

Thomas E. Hall and J. David Ferguson

A comprehensive economic and historical explanation of the events pertaining to the Depression, this book begins by describing the economic setting in the major industrialized countries during the 1920s and the gold standard that linked theory economies together. It then discusses the triggering event that started the economic decline--the Federal Reserve's credit tightening in reaction to perceived overspeculation in the U.S. stock market. The policy bungling that transformed the recession into the Great Depression is detailed: Smoot Hawley, the Federal Reserve's disastrous adherence to the real bills doctrine, and Hoover's 1932 tax hike. This is followed by a detailed description of the New Deal's shortcomings in trying to end the Depression, along with a discussion of the National Socialist economic programs in Germany. Finally, the factors that ended the Depression are examined.


80 posted on 02/13/2005 4:55:21 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson