Skip to comments.
House approves electronic ID cards
CNet News ^
| February 10, 2005
| Declan McCullagh
Posted on 02/11/2005 6:40:52 AM PST by yatros from flatwater
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-127 next last
Your 'papers' please.
To: yatros from flatwater
"Your 'papers' please." - Ryder rental agent
"Mohammed, lets get out of here, they wont rent me Ryder truck"
2
posted on
02/11/2005 6:44:37 AM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: yatros from flatwater
I can see both sides of the issue. It's a tough call.
3
posted on
02/11/2005 6:46:09 AM PST
by
Pyro7480
("All my own perception of beauty both in majesty and simplicity is founded upon Our Lady." - Tolkien)
To: yatros from flatwater
or RFID tagCottage industry alert! Tin foil lined Tyvec folder in which to hold your ID card. Only in this case, tin foil makes sense.
4
posted on
02/11/2005 6:48:08 AM PST
by
NonValueAdded
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" HRC 6/28/2004)
To: Pyro7480
There will be a loss of some privacy with this initiative. But if the cards will not be available to illegal immigrants and if it contained information about whether or not the holder was a convicted felon then it will solve the immigrant problem and voter fraud in one fell swoop.
I think it's worth it.
5
posted on
02/11/2005 6:52:08 AM PST
by
BRITinUSA
To: yatros from flatwater
This article, and many like it, are a crock.
NO WHERE in the bill does RFID tags come up, nor does it imply that your license will no become a tracking device.
"a magnetic strip" Oh noooooooooooooooooo........
Guess what folks, if ya live in FL ya already got one of those magnetic strips on the back of your license.
So when cops pull you over all they have to do is swipe your license instead of manually typing in your info.
6
posted on
02/11/2005 6:56:56 AM PST
by
OXENinFLA
To: OXENinFLA
7
posted on
02/11/2005 6:57:32 AM PST
by
OXENinFLA
To: yatros from flatwater
As much as I support uniform standards for durable identification, statements like this one are misleading:
"... that four of the Sept. 11, 2001, hijackers possessed valid state-issued driver's licenses." Yes they did, but some of the cards were issued by a corrupt employee and all we'd be guaranteeing in that case is no one will question their whizzbang new ID card with the fancy chip. Only a two-man rule on card issuance would help in that case and even that isn't foolproof.
A national ID card is inevitable and even desirable (think voter fraud). The real test of any program will be finding the prohibitions on cross-referencing the ID in other government databases.
cite: paragraph 3
8
posted on
02/11/2005 6:57:42 AM PST
by
NonValueAdded
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" HRC 6/28/2004)
To: Pyro7480
With all its drawbacks, I actually favor a national ID card. It would go a long way to reducing voter fraud in the USA. There are any number of ways that a coded card can be verified as a means of positive identification. IMHO, no national ID or certified driver license presented to election officals, and you don't vote. I also believe you should have to present at least two (2) verifiable "photo" IDs when voting in federal elections (Driver's License, Passport, ATM Card photo, etc.). Absentee balloting should be limited to military personnnel only and no provisional ballots under any circumstances. People who cannot vote on Election Day should be be allowed to vote early. All voting must be done in person, with the only exception, being the military folks.
To: yatros from flatwater
The Department of Homeland Security would be charged with drafting the details of the regulation. This part is particularly troubling. It suggests the bill creates open ended powers for Homeland security. Why not work those details into the bill, or at least set limits.
We already have a federal ID of sorts--the Social Security Card--although legal it's not supposed to be used this way.
Besides, when conservatives, gun owners and the ACLU get together on the same side of a piece of legislation, something must be wrong.
To: BRITinUSA
I am "Kerrying" on this issue-I can see both sides of it. It can be a good thing but also could be abused.
Kerrying - the act of switching positions on a political issue, also known as flip-flopping.
11
posted on
02/11/2005 7:01:36 AM PST
by
RockinRight
(It's NOT too early to start talking about 2006...or 2008.)
To: Pyro7480
Sorry guys but I do not like seeing the Federal Government becoming more powerful everyday. I like how it can be use to control the illegal immigration, and the terrorist. However, if the politicians would just enforce the existing laws of illegal immigration, then this would not be needed.
Furthermore, I am concerned that this could be abused too. Maybe not now, but down the road. Perhaps 10 to 20 years from now.
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: NonValueAdded
A national ID card is inevitable and even desirable (think voter fraud). The real test of any program will be finding the prohibitions on cross-referencing the ID in other government databases. I agree. I mean our driver's license or our social security card (take your pick) is already our de facto national id card.
Toss the RFID and the provisions for sharing driving records between states (uh how does that foil terrorism/illegal immigration?) and I would sign that puppy right now.
14
posted on
02/11/2005 7:10:39 AM PST
by
Smogger
To: JLAGRAYFOX
I totally agree with you.
15
posted on
02/11/2005 7:14:06 AM PST
by
TN4Bush
To: Pyro7480
It's not tough at all. It's simple. It's a great idea.
To: yatros from flatwater
measure would force "states to deny driver's licenses to undocumented immigrants" So what's wrong with that?
To: yatros from flatwater
As expected, we're all going to get screwed because the Democrats refuse to run their states responsibly.
18
posted on
02/11/2005 7:25:01 AM PST
by
Bogey78O
(Hillary Clinton + Fertility pills + Scott Peterson + rowboat = Success)
To: JLAGRAYFOX
Absentee balloting should be limited to military personnnel only and no provisional ballots under any circumstances. People who cannot vote on Election Day should be be allowed to vote early. All voting must be done in person, with the only exception, being the military folks.
This would be a poor idea. As of election day this past November, I had been living outside the country for 4 months. Somehow, I don't think that voting 4 months early constitutes an "informed vote," nor is it a good idea to suddenly require all registered voters living overseas to drop a significant chunk of change to return home for a day if they want to be counted.
I could certainly understand setting up the necessity of an absentee ballot IN PERSON during registration, or simply ahead of time IN PERSON with the local election board.
19
posted on
02/11/2005 7:28:44 AM PST
by
NationSoConceived
("Truth bestows no pardon upon error, but wipes it out in the most effectual manner." - M.B.E.)
To: NonValueAdded
A national ID card is inevitable and even desirable (think voter fraud). How will it stop inner city precincts from showing 100% turnout, 99% Dem votes?
20
posted on
02/11/2005 7:30:24 AM PST
by
palmer
("Oh you heartless gloaters")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-127 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson