Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9/11 hijacker used bypass code to obtain California license
Bakersfield Californian ^ | 2/5/05 | Don Thompson - AP

Posted on 02/05/2005 8:59:51 PM PST by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: Doohickey
California was one of the first states to require that Social Security numbers be verified
41 posted on 02/06/2005 9:22:52 AM PST by lewislynn (The meaning of life can be described in one word...Grandchildren)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
What's wrong with this picture?...


42 posted on 02/06/2005 10:57:57 AM PST by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
Is there ANYTHING that our chief executive can do wrong?

Admit it. This article isn't about our chief executive doing wrong in this case. He didn't do wrong in this case.

Shall I diagram it for you?

43 posted on 02/06/2005 11:07:32 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

Of course this has nothing to do with President Bush but you just can't pass up an oppritunity to take a potshot at him.


44 posted on 02/06/2005 11:19:36 AM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wita

I don't blame you! Only time I like it is when it is pouring rain or sleeting. Otherwise, I put the nozzle in myself and wait for the idiots to push the button.


45 posted on 02/06/2005 11:54:12 AM PST by Danae (Thank you G.W. Bush! You make me PROUD to be an American!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
"his globalist policies to create "unions" within the "americas" "

Do you have a source for such a statement that President Bush ever made to that effect?

Or are you just repeating the old Buchanan lies from 2000.

Bush defeated Buchanan long ago, get over it.

46 posted on 02/06/2005 12:32:36 PM PST by bayourod (Unless we get over 40% of the Hispanic vote in 2008, President Hillary will take all your guns away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
Do your own research. Google Bush +FTAA.

And as usual, you can't help but try to pigeonhole someone. I didn't support Buchanan then and don't now, and I voted for Bush twice. So shove your insults.

47 posted on 02/06/2005 4:44:38 PM PST by A Navy Vet (Do any US representives compare their copious rhetoric to their Constitutional oath?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
I did your suggested search and didn't see anything close to Bush saying that he wanted to create "'unions' within the 'americas'"If you don't have any source for that, I'll dismiss it as the product of your imagination.
48 posted on 02/06/2005 5:38:16 PM PST by bayourod (Unless we get over 40% of the Hispanic vote in 2008, President Hillary will take all your guns away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Thanks, Howlin.

It really amazes me that Pres. Bush did not stop this process in the first 5 minutes of his term beginning!

Yes, that was extreme sarcasm.


49 posted on 02/06/2005 6:55:30 PM PST by cspackler (There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet; janetgreen; All

On the Homeland Security front...

After 9/11, President Bush authorized 2,000 new border-patrol agents per year for five years. Unfortunately, the figure now stands at 200, due to budget constraints (budget constraints that, sadly, have not applied to other agencies, such as DoEd, DoT, and PBS). Strangely, $74 million has been substituted for surveillance and aerial technology, in the hopes that this will make up for the lack of manpower on the ground. But if there was any message in the 9/11 report, it was that technological intelligence is no substitute for human intelligence.

This is not simply about Mexican illegals looking to work on a farm. Al-Qa'ida already has a foothold in countries like Venezuela, where it is suspected that the Chavez government had (has?) been protecting them with false-identity papers and passports. Former Taliban mullahs also fled there in 2000. If these cutthroats try to enter the U.S., it won't be through Nova Scotia.

The Federalist Patriot (FederalistPatriot.US)
http://FederalistPatriot.US/current2004a.asp
Feb. 4, 2005
_________


50 posted on 02/06/2005 7:19:28 PM PST by JustAnotherSavage ("We are all sinners. But jerks revel in their sins." PJ O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherSavage
This is not simply about Mexican illegals looking to work on a farm. Al-Qa'ida already has a foothold in countries like Venezuela, where it is suspected that the Chavez government had (has?) been protecting them with false-identity papers and passports. Former Taliban mullahs also fled there in 2000. If these cutthroats try to enter the U.S., it won't be through Nova Scotia.

Many on this board don't think this is a problem. I do think it's a big problem that could become a huge problem if there's another terrorist attack with terrorists entering via Mexico. America will not take kindly to the free-for-all via Mexico that has been going on before and after 9/11/01. A nation without borders will fall.

51 posted on 02/06/2005 7:31:19 PM PST by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen

Good night, janetgreen, I'm going to go harass my family for a while.


52 posted on 02/06/2005 7:41:25 PM PST by JustAnotherSavage ("We are all sinners. But jerks revel in their sins." PJ O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherSavage

'Night, JAS. I think I'll do the same!


53 posted on 02/06/2005 8:14:49 PM PST by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
Uuuh, just for the sake of supporting a political party, is a stretch beyond belief.

Why not compare the principles of the two parties in question? Are you a John Kerry supporter, or did you want Howard Dean as president? You take the good with the bad, no President is perfect, but after the criminal bill clinton, I would think you could cut our present President some slack. What the h e double q do you want? Perfection is not one of the choices.

Personally, I don't particularly like the immigration policies or the suspected policies or the direction the policies are going, but it is C O N G R E S S that makes those decisions, so take it up with your congress persons, and give the President some respect for having information a brain and advisors, with far more information related to the immigration subject than you or I ever thought of having.

54 posted on 02/07/2005 5:47:14 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wita
" Why not compare the principles of the two parties in question? Are you a John Kerry supporter, or did you want Howard Dean as president? You take the good with the bad, no President is perfect, but after the criminal bill clinton, I would think you could cut our present President some slack. What the h e double q do you want? Perfection is not one of the choices. Personally, I don't particularly like the immigration policies or the suspected policies or the direction the policies are going, but it is C O N G R E S S that makes those decisions, so take it up with your congress persons, and give the President some respect for having information a brain and advisors, with far more information related to the immigration subject than you or I ever thought of having."

1. The "two parties" are so closely aligned now on so many issues that it's sometimes hard to tell the difference;
2. I pulled the lever twice for President Bush and have respect for him as a person of decency and intergrity, and I've given him plenty of slack on his exorbitant spending and other matters.
3. As the chief law enforcement officer of the country, it is his duty to ensure the laws of the land are enforced by directing the resources he has available, which are plentiful;
3. I doubt Bush has experienced 2 or 5 or 8 illegals traipsing through his back yard, scaring his children and breaking his side gate and leaving trash and crap on his Texas ranch. I lived a mile from "Smugglers Gulch" on a curve that caused the illegals to take a short cut through our modest little home. I've seen sections and even entire towns in Southern California turn into barrios. I've experienced this invasion first hand in many ways for many years, so don't lecture me about his informed position;
4. President Bush is just plain wrong on this issue and I have the right and duty to criticize my representatives.

55 posted on 02/08/2005 9:51:41 AM PST by A Navy Vet (Do any US representives compare their copious rhetoric to their Constitutional oath?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson