Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IT'S TIME TO THINK ABOUT CHILDREN (Gay "Marriage", Canada, ACES!)
National Post (Canada) ^ | February 5, 2005 | Barbara Kay

Posted on 02/05/2005 5:06:35 PM PST by GMMAC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Note: as the National Post operates a pay-to-view website, this url only confirms the article's source:
1 posted on 02/05/2005 5:06:36 PM PST by GMMAC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; coteblanche; Ryle; albertabound; mitchbert; ...

Faith & Family Ping


2 posted on 02/05/2005 5:08:30 PM PST by GMMAC (lots of terror cells in Canada - I'll be waving my US flag when the Marines arrive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
It's very sad to see our children used as pawns by selfish homosexuals who HAVE to have children. It's all part of their yearning to be thought NORMAL. It ain't gonna work.

How arrogant and self-centered of them to deny children mothers/fathers. We have enough problems with heterosexuals who are bad parents without ADDING to the problems of our most innocent, vulnerable and precious children.

3 posted on 02/05/2005 5:17:10 PM PST by starfish923
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

If God had wanted homosexuals to have children, I'm sure He had the power to make it so.


4 posted on 02/05/2005 5:18:06 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

It's hard enough to raise a family in the traditional sense. I sacrifice a lot of my personal self for the sake of my family. Would that be the case in the long term for a gay couple like Melissa Etheridge and her ex for instance?


5 posted on 02/05/2005 5:26:11 PM PST by Thebaddog (Dawgs off the coffee table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

My heart goes out to the poor children who will suffer through this abomination.

I tutored a young girl last year who lived with "two mommies". Believe me, she was so ashamed. Here she was, put in the position of hating what her mother was and then feeling guilty about her feelings. I felt very sad for her...and she did not, for one minute, blame society. She blamed her mother.


6 posted on 02/05/2005 5:26:36 PM PST by JudyinCanada (I can't wait, the dream is coming true and I will stand in front of the box to put my heart into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
Nobody has asked children ...

This is the crux of the gay marriage argument - children and legal homosexual access to them.

As with abortion's central concern about the right of women, without a care for the unborn child, nobody speaks for the adoption of children in the gay marriage debate because the matter hasn't arisen yet. But, it will.

7 posted on 02/05/2005 5:26:52 PM PST by Noachian (We're all one judge away from tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC; little jeremiah; scripter; Clint N. Suhks; DirtyHarryY2K; ArGee; nicmarlo; ...

Bump & Ping


8 posted on 02/05/2005 5:35:31 PM PST by EdReform (Free Republic - helping to keep our country a free republic. Thank you for your financial support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
"It's hard enough to raise a family in the traditional sense. I sacrifice a lot of my personal self for the sake of my family. Would that be the case in the long term for a gay couple like Melissa Etheridge and her ex for instance?

Good point - but I haven't heard a peep from the gay-rights crowd about the OBLIGATIONS of family.

It's just "we're entitled to this... we want to have access to that...".

For most gays agitating for marriage, it's another opportunity to GET SOMETHING.

Hey, you can be gay all day long, I really don't care - but who is going to pay for all these freebies you are demanding?

Me, that's who.

So take a leap, twinkletoes. (And I mean that in the nicest way possible.)

9 posted on 02/05/2005 5:42:48 PM PST by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

BTTT


10 posted on 02/05/2005 5:50:47 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real politcal victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

In the USA, the ABA sponsored Model Divorce Code has children as "accessories" to marriage. The ABA (and the left) does not include children in marriage. The ABA envisions marriage as a mere expression of sex between people.

That is their purpose, to convert marriage from a raising children driven institution into a adult activity mere contract.


11 posted on 02/05/2005 5:54:35 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
If God had wanted homosexuals to have children, I'm sure He had the power to make it so.

And if the homosexuals believed in God they would repent.

12 posted on 02/05/2005 5:58:07 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The homosexuals have "a" god. It is their orgasm via fetish.

Homosexuals worship their sex act. It defines everything that they are.


13 posted on 02/05/2005 6:09:20 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
"all children need is love; and love has no gender."

REAL LOVE HAS GENDER
14 posted on 02/05/2005 7:07:01 PM PST by Skylus ("It's not love...it's sinful lust")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Skylus

what KIND of love?

platonic? friendship? paternal? maternal? sexual? erotic? conditional? unconditional?

For homosexuals ALL love is sex acts.


15 posted on 02/05/2005 7:09:22 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
The homosexuals have "a" god. It is their orgasm via fetish.

Homosexuals worship their sex act. It defines everything that they are.


To take it further their "god" is really themselves when you think about it.
16 posted on 02/05/2005 7:12:39 PM PST by Nowhere Man (We have enough youth, how about a Fountain of Smart?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
As McGill bioethicist Margaret Somerville recently noted, Article 16 of the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights says, "Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and found a family (my emphasis)," not "two people of full age" and not "to marry and sanctify their romantic attachment."

With Kofi and Mr Sevans blessings no doubt. How much money did they take from the international gay lobby to sign this into the charter ?
17 posted on 02/05/2005 7:13:40 PM PST by John Lenin (Don't let them fool you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
I asked what his position was on adoption equity for gays.

They really are clever in coming up with new terms to couch deviant sexual behavior as a "civil right". We cannot fight this much longer unless we have 20 years of conservative judges stuffed into robes everywhere. The West is setting itself up for a Muslim takeover.

18 posted on 02/05/2005 7:18:03 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noachian

nobody speaks for the adoption of children in the gay marriage debate because the matter hasn't arisen yet. But, it will. The argument and gay adoption has indeed arisen. Gays adopt all the time. Either one or the other partner adopts, or one partner has children, and the other is a step parent. IE: Rosie ODonnell, adopted kids, and her partner has her own children, they all live with the 2 mommies. Rosie stated in an interview that her son has said he wishes he had a Dad, so there you have it.


19 posted on 02/05/2005 7:25:49 PM PST by gidget7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: montag813

They really are clever in coming up with new terms to couch deviant sexual behavior as a "civil right".



Aren't they though?? Nauseating! Like this one:


"disability" on the procreative front


20 posted on 02/05/2005 7:30:55 PM PST by gidget7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson