Posted on 01/31/2005 4:41:14 PM PST by newsgatherer
"Which is what, exactly? How bad this piece was? Are homosexuals born or trained? Are homosexuals evil, de facto? "
If you wish to assualt the writings and not the wisdom, then so be it. You have no quarrel with me. I am sorry I mistook your words and inserted my own meaning, I really am.
If you have any further discussion about morals and homosexuality, that is where my interest lies. Not in the level of writing the author shows.
As you already understand, I am less experienced (and much less concerned) in noting the skills of writers when compared to the message. (This applies to people with a message, not a story.)
Again though, if you have any discussion points on the morality of homosxuality, then I'm up for talking. If it's only about how the piece was carried out, I should have kept my nose out and will remove it promptly.
I'm not particularly concerned with the morality of homosexuality; I don't really care who others choose to "congregate" with---that's their business, not mine. You seem like a fairly nice, well-meaning guy. Let's just leave it at that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.