Skip to comments.
New York Lawmakers Want $1 Billion for Embryonic Stem Cell Research
lifenews.com ^
| January 17, 2005
| by Steven Ertelt
Posted on 01/30/2005 12:00:48 PM PST by underlying
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: underlying
Ping to self for later pingout.
2
posted on
01/30/2005 12:01:48 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Moral Absolutes are what make the world go round.)
To: Mamzelle; onyx; Howlin; MeekOneGOP; underlying
Tag you're it, Mamzelle! What is this the 50th thread by now from the same newbie troll, same writer, same site all posted in less than four hours.
3
posted on
01/30/2005 12:02:45 PM PST
by
bd476
(God Bless those in harm's way and bring peace to those who have lost loved ones today.)
To: bd476
Gotcha. This is getting to be fun.
4
posted on
01/30/2005 12:03:15 PM PST
by
Mamzelle
To: bd476
Argh! You got here first!
5
posted on
01/30/2005 12:03:43 PM PST
by
Mamzelle
To: bd476
Post #32 in ~3 hours... same website, same "author"... this troll must be going for a record.
6
posted on
01/30/2005 12:03:44 PM PST
by
fuquadukie
(If you can't hang with the big dogs, then don't jump off the porch.)
To: bd476
Good gosh; this is out of control.
I thought we weren't suppose to spam and/or try to lure people to our web sites.
7
posted on
01/30/2005 12:04:39 PM PST
by
Howlin
(It's a great day to be an American -- and a Bush Republican!!!!)
To: fuquadukie
Do you suppose this underlying Steve is going to go all the way back to Roe/'73?
8
posted on
01/30/2005 12:06:02 PM PST
by
Mamzelle
To: fuquadukie
Seems so. Sick puppy of a troll.
9
posted on
01/30/2005 12:06:18 PM PST
by
bd476
(God Bless those in harm's way and bring peace to those who have lost loved ones today.)
To: underlying
Whether or not you agree with such research this is getting ridiculous. How many separate and duplicated research projects are going to be funded by politicians eagerly and blindly jumping on the politically expedient bandwagon of Stem Cell Research?
IMO If such research is to be approved and conducted there absolutely needs to be some sort of formal coordination of all of these efforts or, in the alternative, grouping them all under a Federal umbrella.
10
posted on
01/30/2005 12:07:01 PM PST
by
drt1
To: Howlin
It sure is. I've lost count. Is there a possibility that it's a bot or some virus or something?
11
posted on
01/30/2005 12:07:22 PM PST
by
bd476
(God Bless those in harm's way and bring peace to those who have lost loved ones today.)
To: Mamzelle
Do you suppose this underlying Steve is going to go all the way back to Roe/'73? You could be right! I haven't picked up the trend yet whether it is going forward or backward.
12
posted on
01/30/2005 12:09:20 PM PST
by
bjs1779
To: bd476; Mamzelle
Defintely has an "agenda"... sort of an "in your face" agenda. While I'm opposed to abortion, I do not care one bit about the holy-roller "in your face" types. I was sickened one Sunday when a guest speaker was allowed to exhibit such an approach DURING Mass.
13
posted on
01/30/2005 12:09:51 PM PST
by
fuquadukie
(If you can't hang with the big dogs, then don't jump off the porch.)
To: drt1
Hmmm... didn't catch the Troll like aspects of this post. 32 in 3 hours??
14
posted on
01/30/2005 12:10:10 PM PST
by
drt1
To: fuquadukie
Prolifer who is alienating prolifers?
15
posted on
01/30/2005 12:11:17 PM PST
by
Mamzelle
To: fuquadukie
It is an insincere troll who's posting probably from DU. Notice that it has not responded to anyone.
It's a sick troll, very sick, but it is still a troll.
16
posted on
01/30/2005 12:12:36 PM PST
by
bd476
(God Bless those in harm's way and bring peace to those who have lost loved ones today.)
To: Mamzelle
Yes. Some prolifers seem to take the "holier than thou" approach... "You better agree with me! And be vocal about it!"... Some of us are a tad more reserved.
17
posted on
01/30/2005 12:13:16 PM PST
by
fuquadukie
(If you can't hang with the big dogs, then don't jump off the porch.)
To: underlying
Great idea: Let's spend $1 billion, cannibalize human embryos, and then contaminate the cell lines! Yea!!!
To: underlying
This is nothing but a $1 billion advertisement for the "pro-choice" philosophy, and thus should be treated as campaign spending subject to FEC regulations.
To: bd476
Seems as though 'ole underlying is ZOT!
20
posted on
01/30/2005 12:16:42 PM PST
by
fuquadukie
(If you can't hang with the big dogs, then don't jump off the porch.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson